The Bracero Program Analysis

436 Words1 Page

If you build a treehouse in a rotting tree, then spend years trying to fix the house without realizing the problem is within the tree itself, you will never have a treehouse that can be reliable. The Bracero Program of 1943 was much like this proverbial treehouse. It was the promise of a better life for the Mexican laborer that turned into a bitter disappointment due to corruption from both the U.S. agricultural industry and both governments involved. The memory of this program has been buried and the focus has been shifted to a broad “immigration issue” largely due to the corruption that honoring these Mexican laborers would reveal. Society has gone so far in its smoke-and-mirror routine to alter our memory, as to devote entire arguments over the semantics of whether to call the Mexican laborer an “illegal alien” or an “undocumented worker”. It could be argued that the larger issue is what to call a government who exploits the foreign laborer who has no legal rights in that country to demand better living conditions or higher wages.
The Bracero Program was a set …show more content…

wanted this agreement was because of a worker shortage due to men going to World War II. Mexico saw this as an income opportunity, as well as an educational opportunity. They hoped the men would learn new farming techniques and come home better educated. The agreement negotiated that ten percent of the workers’ salary would be held in a savings fund for them to retrieve upon their return to Mexico.

The Mexican Revolution from 1910-1920 left Mexican rural areas less populated as the poor moved to larger cities to find work. Many of these families left Mexico and migrated to the U.S. as widespread poverty of Mexico could not sustain them. At the same time, the United States was going through a depression and could not afford to provide welfare for these families. Mexico couldn’t afford to repatriate them so they were left alone and they found work in the farms of the United

Open Document