The Botany Of Desire Summary

1179 Words3 Pages

Analysis of The Botany of Desire

Michael Pollan’s book The Botany of Desire delves deep into the issues of nature’s

interaction with genetically modified potatoes, but also focuses on all of genetic engineering in

relation to natural organisms. Pollan outsets his chapter with his background of his own position,

that he is a gardener. (However, this fact does not make him a true authority over the examination

of genetic engineering.) He further develops his chapter through the cross examination of different

points in geographical space and historical periods of time where the potato has changed a people

or the people have changed the potato. Pollan mentions how the Irish, English, and Incas interacted

with and altered our perception …show more content…

Pollan analyzes the way in which the agriculture of the potato changed cultures of

the people. Underlying this is also the economic and political implication the potato had. In the

case of the Irish in 1588 (198), the potato rose as the miracle source of sustenance while boosting

their economic status and fell as monoculture practices doomed the potato in Ireland. Similarly,

Pollan provides a background of how people saw the potato and those who cultivated it. In

England in 1794 (202) the potato represented a lack of culture due to its association with coming

from the dirt and not requiring any refinement, as wheat did. Pollan's historical descriptions

substantiate his information. This information directly supplements his NewLeaf experiment and

Pollan's approach to the subject of the NewLeaf potato is presented fairly and seems to …show more content…

But Forsyth explicitly states how no farmer “'would use them if we had any choice,'.” (218) To be

fair in his chapter Pollan includes the opposite side's view, that of Steve Young. Pollan visits Steve

Young who is the model “of a man in complete control.” (220) Young has a fully automated farm

and relies heavily on the use of chemicals in his farming, even owning a share in the local

chemical distributor. Pollan maintains a fair representation of both sides in his chapter through

presenting these two sides on the NewLeaf as well as Monsanto's chemicals.

Instead of outright saying that farming chemicals are awful and should not be used, Pollan uses

Forsyth's account. In reference to the chemical Monitor, which is one of countless other pesticides

and insecticides, Forsyth puts in perspective how lethal it is: he would rather loose his entire crop

“than expose himself or an employee to this poison.” (219) However, as aforementioned, Forsyth

has no alternative. To ensure fairness here, Pollan presents Mike Heath's organic farming style not

using chemicals and relying on diversified non­monoculture farming. Pollan also notes

Open Document