The Book Of Sand Literary Analysis

1657 Words4 Pages

Humanity’s knowledge of many things are limited, and while we know that some things are infinite, our mind cannot comprehend infinity itself. There is so much in this universe that is unknown, so many things that cannot be explained, for example, Stonehenge, Gate of the Sun, and The Great Pyramid of Giza, amongst others. There is no way for us to pinpoint the beginning or the end, space and time are perceived as infinite which means that anything that can happen will happen or has already happened. Time is something that is relative, no one experiences it the same way, just as no one experiences color and taste the same way. In our planet time exists in one form, it flows forward, but because of our limited knowledge of things outside of our solar system there is no way to know how time works outside of it. In The Book of Sand by Jorge Luis Borges the narrator is sold a book that is said to be infinite, at first he is skeptical of the book, but as the time passes he becomes consumed, attempting to find the end or the beginning, but like sand, the book doesn’t seem to have a …show more content…

There is no proof that Papito is an actual man, and not just a figment of Julio’s imagination. Papito could also be seen as Julio’s conscience, something that helped him deal with the isolation, but nevertheless, his existence is questionable. “Forgettable Papito little-nothing was a rag tossed on the floor” (Valenzuela 15). Papito is such an easy person to forget because he was never there at all, he is a mere illusion, someone Julio thought up to keep him company. The readers are lead to believe that Papito is someone that was real, someone that lived next door to the main character, but the lack of interaction between the two characters leaves many questions. Julio could have not proven Papito’s existence because there is not a way to prove that something outside of your mind is actually

Open Document