preview

Metaphysics: What Is Time? Is Time Travel Possible?

analytical Essay
2024 words
2024 words
bookmark

McGregor, Kadijah
Paper 1: Metaphysics

What is time? Is time travel possible? When nothing is changing does time still exits ? Is that really true? Are you real? Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that is significant to us when questions and other clams bring curiosity about whether things are real or not. Throughout the day we are constantly checking the time, preparing for the upcoming months, and keeping track of the year. Clocks tell us the time we use as a measurement. It’s how we keep track of those important months and events, such as holidays and birthdays. Although there are many investigations and research being done on the nature of time, many unresolved issues remain.
When considering the issue upon the ontological differences …show more content…

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes how mctaggart asserts that there are differences in time, but also that time does not exist, which is inconsistent with the fact that each of those differences reject the statement about time.
  • Argues that mctaggart's argument about a series is mistaken about the sense of time and semantic differences in tenses.
  • Analyzes how mctaggart's argument is a stand-alone argument, where he clams that reality can contain characteristics that appear to be known in the experience of the absolute reality.
  • Cites oaklander, n., and smith, q. (eds), the new theory of time, new haven: yale university press.
  • Explains that metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that is significant when questions and other clams bring curiosity about whether things are real or not.
  • Explains that time is change with direction because the universe is derived from earlier states. the variable "n" represents the best theories of major science.
  • Explains that time is reliant on events existing in all the situations that establishes time. mctaggart's ontology states that the nature of time does not match align with existence.

This is inconsistent with the fact that each of those differences reject the statement about time. He admits to this contradiction defending that any attempt to explain why there are difference in time is strictly due to the fact that we need to detail the order in which those events occurred (past, present, or future). The description of the “different times” raises the purpose of the past, present, or future and in turn will lead to a “vicious infinite regress” (Christensen, 1974). The vicious infinite regress is invoked because in order to explain why the alternative appeal to the differences in time, doesn’t go through that effort again, we must first be able to explain why each apply consecutively and then explain why that sequence appeals to the differences in time, which has no end to clarification. In McTaggart’s The Nature of Existence he explains how he no longer goes against the circulatory doubts, which is arguable in itself because he has come begin to treat the differences in tenses as unpretentious and inexpressible concepts, arguing that the tenses don’t need to be explained at all. McTaggart now claims that despite his inability to describe what the time differences mean, we can now apply them without additional scrutiny. This still leads to

Let Our AI Magic Supercharge Your Grades!

    Get Access