Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of WW 1 on Russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Bolshevik Consolidation of Power 1918-21
The Bolsheviks under Lenin, when they came into power in October 1917,
faced immense problems in trying to consolidate their hold over the
ex-tsarist empire. Firstly, how were the Bolsheviks, in view of their
military resources, to extend their hold over the nation at large? The
second, was how could they achieve a speedy end to the war and effect
a rapid withdrawal of the German army, which was currently occupying
the western part of Russia. Thirdly, how quickly would they be able to
stage an economic recovery?
Beset by internal and external enemies, the Bolsheviks were engaged in
a desperate struggle for survival. Pre-1917, they had been spent in
preparing plans for the revolution, and less attention was given to
the details of how affairs would be organised once this had been
achieved. Trotsky had expressed this simple faith at his time of
appointment as commissar for foreign affairs, when h e said that all
that was required to be done was 'to issue a few decrees, then shut up
shop and go home'.
An internal threat occurred in 1918, in the form of a civil war,
fought between 1918 and 1920, in which the Bolsheviks (the Reds) were
confronted by a loose combination of anti-Bolshevik forces (the
whites); the external threat came from abroad in 1918-19, with a
series of military interventions by a number of foreign powers,
including Britain, France, the USA and Japan.
1 The Dissolution of A Constituent Assembly
For Lenin, true democracy was the rule of the Bolshevik Party, the
voice of the revolutionary masses. This particular interpretation of
democracy, often referred to ...
... middle of paper ...
...a committee and demanded new elections, freedom of
speech and press, assembly, trade unions, more political parties, the
release of left-wing prisoners, the end of food rations, the removal
of commissars from factories, and the allowance of food transfers.
They wanted collective human rights. The fact that the people who were
revolting against communism were the very people who founded it, meant
that Trotsky had to sit up and take note. Trotsky ordered 60,000 red
troops to storm the base, where ruthless fighting took place, and the
workers and soldiers eventually surrendered; this marked the height of
the political unrest.
The leaders of the demonstration were said to be Whites (whether this
was true or not is unclear), and they were executed. Lenin decided
that it was time to be more lenient of war communism ideals.
The beginning of the document is worded in such a way that it has an almost patronizing tone as the emperor praises the king’s humility. However, as the document progresses it becomes much firmer and in the final lines the tone becomes very harsh as the emperor warns the king to never act on his denied demands.
they declared their desire to become vassals of your Majesty, and to form an alliance with me”(Second Letter, 38–39).
It suddenly became possible to speak of matters which were forbidden in an ordinary way.” Also “hatred of. neighbours would now be openly expressed, and vengeance taken.” “Old. scores would be settled,” and all this under the umbrella of morality. and self righteousness of the self.
...s undeniable to many who had simply been living in compliance with the established codes, never questioning or investigating them. It was one factor in the many following movements for freedom of speech, contributing to the separation of church and state of today.
rights reserved to the states, crush civil liberties, and restore monarchy. He saw the confederacy was the
The Transformation of Bolshevik Position Between February and October 1917 Most historians think that the Bolshevik’s position went from playing almost no role in February 1917; they had only 150 members in the Pultilov Works which had 20,000 workers, to taking control of the country in October by a combination of luck and skill. It was said of the Bolshevik party in early 1917 that “The Communist Party existed solely in the leaders.” Many historians think Lenin’s leadership was the joint main reason for making the party into the leading revolutionary group in Russia, along with the luck the Bolsheviks had in the circumstances under the Provisional Government. A few historians claim Germany played a major role in the Bolshevik’s road to power. The Germans helped many previously exiled revolutionaries to get back to Russia when the Tsar abdicated and the Provisional Government came to power from March onwards, in the hope that they would end the war.
“Having first stirred up the people with such words as these (and he had a very loud voice, and was most vigorous in his speaking), he introduced two laws, one providing that if the people had deprived any magistrate of his office, such magistrate should not be allowed to hold office a second time; and another providing that if any magistrate had banished a citizen without trial, such magistrate should be liable to public prosecution.” (Plutarch, Caius Gracchus 4.1)
How significant was Lenin’s leadership in the Bolshevik Consolidation of power in 1924? Lenin's leadership was a crucial factor in consolidating Bolshevik power up until his death in 1924. His pragmatic leadership helped gain some initial support as well as giving him unquestioned authority within the party. Furthermore, his push for the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk to help save the revolution from foreign invasion was crucial and his practicality was further exemplified through War Communism and the introduction of the New Economic Policy (NEP). The use of terror under Lenin's rule was also highly effective in removing political dissidents and exerting Bolshevik authority through coercive measures like the Cheka and the Red Terror.
Dio Cassius implies that this happened one step early in the year. “I lay down my office in its entirety and return to you all authority absolute – authority over the army, the laws and the provinces – not only those territories which you entrusted to me, but those which I later secured for you.” (Roman History, Address made by Augusts to the Senate, from Dio Cassius’ ‘one-step’ account) It is known that from as early as 36 BC Octavian insisted that his speeches were to be recorded.... ...
In the late 19th century Russia had been notably behind Europe economically, they weren’t in possession of the modern farming technologies that could efficiently provide for a large country. As a result 90% of the Russian population were peasants (Massey, 4). The serfs lived in deep poverty; they didn’t have the appropriate apparatus to produce enough crops and most of their landlords had unbelievably high demands. In an effort to reform the economy’s recession tsar Alexander II liberated the serfs. However this created more bad for both the serfs and the nobles. In the beginning the serfs saw this is a great victory and another reason to be thankful for their tsar. But as timed pass by the peasants saw this life of liberty and freedom to be increasingly difficult. The government directly compensated the nobles, while the less desirable land was sold to the peasants at a much higher price. They monthly rent they paid the nobles was replaced with paying the state (Massey, 5). And while the population nearly doubled between 1861-1917 poverty increased not only with the peasants but with the nobles as well. Nobles found it hard to assimilate them to a new life style where they would have to trade their lavish goods with farming tools and as result many of them acquired a large amount of debt. This period signifies a time where the people of Russia opened their eyes to the deep poverty and lives of oppression they were living. This is the point where the feelings of peasants who previously worshiped the tsar turned bitter. After consistent resistance to industrialization the tsar had finally given in, aggressive approaches were put in place and railroads grew more than 15,500 miles in 1880 (Massey,6). As the Industrial production con...
On March 3, 1918 Russia lost 1/3 of its fertile farm lands, 1/3 of its
... reconciliation between the King and parliament proved futile. The relationship of the King and the parliament had reached its breaking point. With both parties refusing to yield, civil war was imminent.
idea of murdering the king was put forth I know you were hesitant on acting, but
The Similarities of Tsarist and Communist Rule in Russia Both forms of government did depend on high degree of central control. However, some Tsars and Stalin exerted more central controls than others. Stalin’s stronger use of central control created differences between the two forms of government. The Tsars used different levels of central control.
to the king, and provide the king with his services. This all came to a gradual