preview

The Articles of Confederation

analytical Essay
544 words
544 words
bookmark

The Articles of Confederation When confronted with the task of constructing a new nation, the founders of the United States had recently emerged from centuries of religious and political oppression by an overly strong central government. After winning their independence, one of the most pressing issues on their minds was the assurance that their new government would have limitations, disallowing it to molest their posterity. The patriarchs wanted a government that balanced between abuse and inefficiency. The first attempt to satiate this dream was the Articles of Confederation. In the period directly following Cornwallis’s surrender, the fresh nation discovered a new task, governing their now-sovereign territories. A meeting of the minds, of the upper echelon of society, was convened to draft a document that would lay out the blueprints for the inaugural government. The resulting document was the Articles of Confederation. The Articles turned out to be a horrible system in practice. In theory they prevented central abuse of power by not allocating relevant power to the government and disallowing a head of state, a president. States squabbled with one another and resembled something of an early day United Nations. The Federal government could do nothing to settle inter-state disputes, nor could they levy taxes, hold a military, or enforce laws. Needless to say the government projected a national and international front that was poor, weak, and inefficient. The very founders who sought a limited government new that vast change was needed, and scrapping the Articles altogether was not out of the question. The winds of frustration with the government swept through the states. The public was tired of the unreliable continental dollar, the inability to repay soldiers for war service, and the overall insufficiencies of the government. Angry, emblazoned citizens voiced their feelings through uprisings, like Bacon and Shay’s rebellions. Shockwaves of perturbed feelings resonated strongly in the minds of the leaders of the states and national government. It was time for the well bred, well fed, well wed, well read, and well read, to go back to the drawing board and supply the nation with a democratic, republic that worked. The Constitutional Convention that is so widely renowned throughout history, (and rightly so), was summoned to meet in Philadelphia, behind closed doors, to re-work the framework of our land. The drafting of the Constitution was held in a city building in Philadelphia, with the windows battened, and hay spread against the foundation to muffle voices.

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the founders of the united states had recently emerged from centuries of religious and political oppression by an overly strong central government. they wanted a government that balanced between abuse and inefficiency.
  • Analyzes how the articles of confederation prevented central abuse of power by not allocating relevant power to the government and disallowing a head of state.
  • Argues that the constitutional convention was summoned to philadelphia to re-work the framework of our land.
  • Explains that the constitution was drafted in philadelphia, with the windows battened, and hay spread against the foundation to muffle voices. the convention was to be bi-partisan and uninfluenced by the complaints of the people.
  • Opines that the constitution that provides basis for the governing of our society is magnificent in its simplicity, and ornate in it relative conciseness.
Get Access