.Summarize the arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising in India. After reading the case the main arguments in favor of the tobacco advertisement ban are the following: Regarding the legal aspect, the government has international precedents that support his decision of banning the tobacco advertisement: courts of Belgium and France have endorsed the decision of banning the advertisements saying that the ban wasn 't unconstitutional and it was looking for the protection of the citizens ' health. Regarding the ethical arguments, the text explains that the World Health Organization estimates that in 2020 there will be up to 8.4 million deaths related to the tobacco consumption and in 2030 this number will increase up to 10 million. …show more content…
According to the text, the Canada Supreme Court says that paternalism in unacceptable in a democratic society. Regarding the responsibility of advertisements in inducing people to begin smoking, the tobacco companies assure that their advertisements are not focused to gain new clients but attract to their brand to the already existing smokers. This statement is supported by a 1998 study made by the Indian Market Research Bureau that revealed that none of the smokers asked said that they began smoking due to advertising. There are also other studies in European countries that show that smoking among young people years after a ban of advertisement didn 't …show more content…
Even so, studies seem to indicate that this increase in unemployment in this sector is compensated by the increase of employment in other sectors that would benefit from the increase in available cash. 4.Give your opinion on what governments should do in regards to tobacco advertising In my opinion, and from an ethical point of view, the Indian Government should ban tobacco ads. Studies say that there would be a decrease in tobacco consumption in the following years. This would have several beneficial effects as an increase of live expectancy and quality of life of the population, would have an economic benefit derived from the decline of illness related to tobacco consumption, would improve productivity in enterprises since smoking breaks would diminish... In relation to the increase of unemployment in the tobacco industry, in particular with regard to the farmers and the rollers, the Government should increase the tax on cigarettes sold and then allocate that revenue growth for recycling those unemployed people and help them to have a second chance. I am not in favor that the State should seek to influence the private life of citizens, but in this case the benefits that can been obtained are much greater than that little loss of
positive and healthful image. This is where beautiful men and women would be seen socializing
The tobacco industry seems like a beneficial addition to our economy. It has basically been a socially acceptable business in the past because it brings jobs to our people and tax money to the government to redistribute; but consider the cost of tobacco related treatment, mortality and disability- it exceeds the benefit to the producer by two hundred billion dollars US. (4) Tobacco is a very profitable industry determined to grow despite government loss or public health. Its history has demonstrated how money can blind morals like an addiction that is never satisfied. Past lawsuits were mostly unsuccessful because the juries blamed the smoker even though the definition of criminal negligence fits the industry’s acts perfectly. Some may argue for the industry in the name of free enterprise but since they have had such a clear understanding of the dangers of their product it changes the understanding of their business tactics and motives. The success of the industry has merely been a reflection of its immoral practices. These practices have been observed through its use of the media in regards to children, the tests that used underage smokers, the use of revenue to avoid the law, the use of nicotine manipulation and the suppression of research.
Sloan Wilson did not publish The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit, a classic on 1950's middle-class conformity, until 1955. But, by July 1953, PALL MALL cigarette advertisers appear aware that "society seemed to reward those who lacked rough edges and eschewed eccentricity" (Blum 794). This conclusion seems justified by a TIME magazine advertisement. Here, these promoters apply this conformity principle and other advertising techniques to a specific socioeconomic group. They seek to lure the expanding male, middle-class audience by presenting indecorous fun, an enticing social situation, and smooth smoking delight all stemming from their product.
Smoking Kills. This is no longer a myth, it’s a fact. According to the British Medical Journal, every time a person smoke a cigarette, he or she will lose about eleven minutes of life here on earth and subject yourself to cancer. In the advertisement below, you can easily tell from just looking at the picture that this ad is against smoking. The ad portrays the message that smoking is deadly, and is able to be comprehended by people of all ages in the hopes that the viewers do not get into a fatal habit such as abusing cigarettes. Essentially, smoking cigarettes is a long term form of suicide. A man is holding a lit cigarette in his hand with his middle and pointer finger, and his thumb held up. As shown in the
After reading both articles, “Paternalism” by Dworkin and “On Liberty” by Mill, I believe that Dworkin is correct in explaining that some intervention is necessary under certain circumstances. I have come to this conclusion based on the fact that there do exist circumstances in which an individual is incapable of making a rational decision considering not only the well being of himself, but also the well being of other members of society. Also, the argument that the protection of the individual committing the action in question is not reason enough to interfere with the action is ludicrous in that one of our governments main reasons for existence is to protect the members of our society. This protection includes protection from ourselves at times when we are unable to rationally decide what is in our best interests. This essay will consist of an examination of this controversy as well as an application of my proposed conclusion.
...ess should only be limited by that of the choices that the individual makes and the opportunities that said individual may or may not take advantage of, not by the choices and opportunities that others may or may not make for them. In these aspects of equality and self-reliance, it is my belief that only government is powerful enough to ensure or attempt to ensure this pursuit.
"Smoking Bans and the Tobacco Industry." Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 1 July 2013. Web. 4 Dec. 2013. .
There is clearly no way tobacco will never be outlawed but I believe there should be tighter restrictions on age limits throughout the world, and restrictions on the materials that are used in cigarette processing. Who is just letting cigarette companies continue to poison people and cause cancer risk? Throughout my essay I will analyze the affects of cigarette use on the society of the world and the elaborate corruption that keeps cigarette companies in business.
When observing this Lucky Strike Cigarette Ad, it was prominent that important people were smoking this brand to increase the hype of the product. While young children are extremely impressionable, older population who idealized these famous people most likely joined the fad because of these images. Therefore, the popularized idea of smoking altogether started with a target at fan groups. Thus, banning this advertisement style of tobacco products is a significant reason for reducing cigarette smoking in the U.S. as the population had less direct forms of famous sponsors. Whereas, sponsors are the strength behind crazes as they are capable of spreading the word and exposing the product in a popular light. The impressions along with the popularity
Although it is beneficial for the economy for the production of tobacco products it is extremely risky to use the product. According to researchers second-hand smoke is terrible for everyone in the world who walk by someone who is exhaling. In the article by Robert Proctor “Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition” he states that cigarettes are the “most deadl...
Cigarette advertisements give the feeling that smokers are "bursting at the seams with joy" and that smoking is useful to you. Shockingly, nothing could be further from reality. The U.S. government has marked cigarettes as an unsafe medication that causes lung malignancy, coronary illness, and numerous different genuine sicknesses and conditions. Numerous individuals everywhere throughout the nation are discussing whether tobacco organizations ought to be permitted to publicize cigarettes or even to make cigarettes in today 's general public ("Analyzing Assorted Tobacco Advertisements").
“Many of the restrictions on tobacco advertising are designed to prevent young from being exposed to it” (Smoking). Above I already mentions that smoke affects all over the body organs; some body organs are too sensitive. “Tobacco contains more than four thousand chemicals, some of which are known to be poisonous or cancer causing” (smoking). Therefore, chemical found in tobacco cause lung cancer and other types of cancer. In the articles “Tobacco and smoking 2004”, it’s written that lung cancer kills more American than breast and prostate cancer combined, and tobacco accounts for over 30% of all cancer deaths and a comparable fraction of death due to heart and lung diseases(National). Each year, many people start to smoke and day-by-day more risks are increasing. Every year different organizations tries to control the use of tobacco in the United States, but none of them became success. In the United States, the first preventable cause of cancer is tobacco. Therefore, the government should enact a law to make the use of tobacco illegal to prevent people suffering from different types of
...nturies. Mill presents a clear and insightful argument, claiming that the government should not be concerned with the free will of the people unless explicit harm has been done to an individual. However, such ideals do not build a strong and lasting community. It is the role of the government to act in the best interests at all times through the prevention of harm and the encouragement of free thought.
Plessis, Pierre D. "Should Alcohol and Cigarette Ads Be Banned." Living Healthy 360. N.p., 2 July 2008. Web. 08 Dec. 2013.
Big brands like Marlboro spend 70% of their profits on advertisements in 3rd world countries to try and get the people who do not know the consequences of smoking.In total tobacco companies spend over ten billion dollars on advertisement world wide. (who.int) The advertisement that is going on is on the covers are are cartoon animals and images that show if you smoke you will be