The Adventures Of The Speckled Band By Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

1953 Words4 Pages

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle utilizes literary elements such as dialogue, tone, vocabulary, a different format of narration and perspective, metafictional techniques, along with chronology to construct the adventures of the famous fictional British detective Sherlock Holmes and his partner, John Watson. The creative use of dialogue assists in telling the story fluently and vividly. Following the dialogue, incorporating such a suspenseful and occasionally humorous tone upon the mysteries maintains interest from case to case. Long winded description and complex vocabulary are infused into Doyle’s writing to accentuate Holmes’s great intelligence. Lastly, these features are accompanied by both Holmes and Watson’s different perspectives alongside each …show more content…

One of the most important literary features of Doyle’s works is the use of dialogue and conversations held between characters, whether it be Holmes, Watson, a victim, and so forth. It seems that the stories are dialogue-heavy, because the purpose of Sherlock Holmes is to interact with people seeking help and solve an enigmatic case full of risks and danger. Using such generous portions of dialogue, however, is not necessarily an unprofessional way of executing the story. In fact, it would be the opposite, in which these lengthy explanations and conversations can allow readers to visualize each scene as if it were happening in front of them like a movie. For instance, in The Adventure of the Speckled Band of The Adventures of the Speckled Band and Other Stories of Sherlock Holmes, Holmes speaks to Watson through questions, such as, “…Did you ever see a bed fastened like that before?”. “I cannot say I have.” is Watson’s only response. Holmes then elaborates, “The lady could not move her bed. It must always be in the same relative position…” and Watson exclaims, “Holmes, I cried, I seem to see dimly what you are hinting at. …show more content…

The most fascinating feature of Doyle’s chronology upon personal analyzation is that everything is organized in a way that easily expresses a true mystery, but still has much more to it than a typical mystery story. Clearly, because Sherlock Holmes is a detective, clues and evidence of the crime are required prior to any action, for detectives to solve or at least get an idea of who was responsible for the crime as well as their motive. So, Doyle frequently inserts blurbs of past occurrences and crimes to develop the mystery and imply anything Holmes may be onto. The most generic format seems to appear after the criminal is discovered and captured, amidst the lengthy explanation Holmes will usually give to Watson to tie the case all together. To illustrate this style is an excerpt of The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle, as Holmes exposes the criminal James Ryder, exclaiming, “You knew that the man Horner, the plumber, had been concerned in some such matter before, and that suspicion would rest the more readily upon him. What did you do, then? You made some small job in my lady’s room-you and your confederate Cusack-and you managed that he should be the man sent for.” In this way, Holmes is presented as a seemingly all-knowing man, which does much to describe Holmes without calling the detective a genius outright. By limiting the clarity of the evidence presented at the very beginning and following

Open Document