Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The fall of the lehman brothers
The fall of the lehman brothers
The fall of the lehman brothers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The fall of the lehman brothers
September 18th, 2008, was a very important date in economic policy history.This date legislators from the house and the senate met to discuss with the federal reserves, a 700 million dollar plan to stop the credit freeze of the financial market. This controversial decision impacted the financial market greatly and has changed economics from that point on. This situation stemmed from Wall Street gambling heavily on the risky housing market. When the housing market crashed it had an domino affect on the financial markets.
Bear Stearns was a global investment bank. A rumor arose stating that they were running out of money. It quickly came to the light that Stearns bought huge amounts of mortgages and then turned them into securities. This term is called toxic assets.
Tim Geithner head of Federal Reserve, initially thought to just let Bear Stearns go bankrupt, but quickly learned that doing that would not be a wise option. The feds learned that Bears had a lot of deals incorporating credit default swaps. Credit default swaps are insurances on bonds, for if they go bad the insurer would pay the own of the insurance. Bear Stearns failure to repay their debt would have directly affected all of Wall-Street, and all around the world. Systemic risk as some would say. The idea that the risk to the financial system as a whole would be too great if Bear Stearns would be allowed to go bankrupt. Unfortunately the Federal Reserve was unable to directly give money to Bear Stearn. So they thought up a plan to give the money to JP Morgan, the bank that backed Bear, and then they would pass it on to Bear Stearns.
Former Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson got involved. Paulson believe that the market was doomed to fail if an actual fix w...
... middle of paper ...
...acticing this. Pragmatism not ideology should govern policy. Pragmatism according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary is a logical way of doing things or of thinking about problems that is based on dealing with specific situations instead of on ideas and theories. While ideology is a set of ideas and beliefs of a group or political party. The struggle between these two is that one states that there is a united one way to think and do something, pragmatism. While ideology is based over time. For example Republicans pressured Paulson to let the various financial players go down, they insisted that the government has no role in the market. This thinking especially in the situation in which all else has failed already is very ideological. While the pragmatic approach would be to realize that something needs to be down within the market, especially if it cannot fix itself.
Consequently, the provisions to separate commercial banking from securities and investment firms were regarded as a way to diminish the risk associated with providing such deposit insurance. Although some historians argue that the depression itself is what caused the collapse of the banking system, in 1933 the general consensus was that banks had provoked the failure by engaging in shady and abusive practices with depositor’s money. Congressional hearings conducted in early 1933 seemed to indicate that bankers and brokers were guilty of “disreputable and seemingly dishonest dealings, and gross misuses of the public's trust” (“Understanding How”, 1998). The Glass Steagall act was the main legislative response of President Roosevelt’s administration to the unprecedented financial turmoil that was facing the nation in the middle of a deep depression. It was intended to regulate and stabilize the banking industry, reduce risk, and provide consumers with confidence in the financial
-1. How could the Federal Reserve prevent and solve financial crisis? – The function of Federal Reserve.
Two major car companies, General Motors (GM) and Chrysler, went bankrupt during the Great Recession. The Government had to make a choice; to get involved with helping them, which would help the economy, or let them fight for themselves. Both choices would leave some American citizens mad at the government. The Government decided to help them by establishing the Auto Bailout along with other programs like TARP. Although some think the Auto Bailout didn’t help small supplier companies, it was the right move for the government to take because it helped stop our economy from going further into a depression.
House of Cards describes in particular the complicated series of events that led to the downfall of Bear Sterns in March 2008. Its actual appeal, however, deduces from its complete and careful analysis of the history of the firm since its origination as an upstart brokerage firm in 1923 and a gripping account of the demise of Bear Sterns in 2007. This failure prognosticated a lot of issues that would eventually stultify the firm, and the author puts forward that its deviation from various historical operating practices led to its ultimate sale to JPMorgan Chase at $10 per share, down from over $170 just a year earlier.
...o turn their securities back into AIG and demand billions of dollars. AIG was faced with a problem and they had to start asking subsidiary insurance companies to liquidate their pension and insurance holdings so they could cover their losses. If this happened those customers would have received a fraction of the money due to them and would ensure a global crisis. Of all the people complaining about AIG, Goldman-Sachs was doing it the most frequently and the loudest. An audit of AIG showed that they had no liquidity to pay off the bulk of what they owed so the Federal government issued a bail out of $80 billion which later elevated to $200 billion. Goldman-Sachs received the largest percentage of that $200 billion and would have torched the entire country in order to get that money that felt they deserved; and the housing-market bubble was just at the beginning of it.
The shares values had fallen and this left people panicking. Many businesses closed and several of the banks did not last because of the businesses collapsing. Many people lost their jobs because of this factor. Congress passed Roosevelt’s Emergency Banking Act, which helped reorganize the banks and closed the ones that were insolvent. Then three days later he urged Americans to put their savings back in their banks and by the end of the month basically three quarters of them reopened. Many people refer to the Banking Act as the Glass Steagall Act that ended up prohibiting commercial banks from engaging in the investment business and created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The purpose of this was to get rid of the speculations in securities making banking safer than before. The demand for goods were declining, so the value of the money was
Many people today would consider the 2008, United States financial crisis a simple “malfunction” or “mistake”, but it was nothing close to that. Contrary to what many believe, renowned economists and financial advisors regarded the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008 to be the most devastating crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930’s. To make matters worse, the decline in the economy expanded nationwide, resulting in the recession of 2007 to 2009 (Brue). David Einhorn, CEO of GreenHorn Capital, even goes as far as to say "What strikes me the most about the recent credit market crisis is how fast the world is trying to go back to business as usual. In my view, the crisis wasn't an accident. We didn't get unlucky. The crisis came because there have been a lot of bad practices and a lot of bad ideas". The 2007 financial crisis was composed of the fall of many major financial institutions, an unknown increase in mortgage loan defaults, and the derived freezing up of credit availability (Brue). It was the result from risky mortgage loans and falling estate values (Brue) . Additionally, the financial crisis of 2007 was the result of underestimation of risk by faulty insurance securities made to protect holders of mortgage-back securities from risk of default and holders of mortgage-backed securities (Brue). Even to present day, America stills suffers from the aftermaths of the financial crisis.
Not only were millions of Americans been put out of work due to these manager’s actions, the American financial markets themselves were pushed to the brink of collapse. Despite the fact that the global financial markets, in reality, are not perfectly efficient, there is a corrective mechanism built into the day-to-day trading in the market. When prices are driven down by large sells, either by large investors or a movement in a stock, there are usually new buyers for these stocks at the cheaper price. Managers of...
This was the rich got richer and the poorer got poorer effect. Then there was the investors ' speculation, where they were buying stocks with the belief that they could always be sold at a profit, they were counting their chickens before they hatched, I believe that this was the “rock that sunk the barrel” and caused the crash of wall street, and which is still being done today, and then the lack of action by the Federal Reserve System, who could have had some control of the crash, and by not deciding to raise interest rates but to merely warn banks to reduce the amount of money they were loaning, even though they were warned by others more aware of the danger, to raise the interest rate, but they didn’t listen, this with an unsound banking system, that made loans easy to get, and lending money to everyone for business activities, real estate, and investments in stocks and bonds. Banks just assumed the economic boom would go on forever, but after “the crash of the New York Stock Exchange on October 29, 1929”, many banks had to close their
Banks all around, especially the large ones, sought to support the market before it could crash down. As the stock prices crashed, banks struggled to keep their doors open (“Economic Causes and Impacts”). Unfortunately, some banks were unsuccessful. Customers wanted their money out from their savings account before it was gone and out of reach, leaving banks insolvent (“Stock Market Crash of 1929”).
The "subprime crises" was one of the most significant financial events since the Great Depression and definitely left a mark upon the country as we remain upon a steady path towards recovering fully. The financial crisis of 2008, became a defining moment within the infrastructure of the US financial system and its need for restructuring. One of the main moments that alerted the global economy of our declining state was the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on Sunday, September 14, 2008 and after this the economy began spreading as companies and individuals were struggling to find a way around this crisis. (Murphy, 2008) The US banking sector was first hit with a crisis amongst liquidity and declining world stock markets as well. The subprime mortgage crisis was characterized by a decrease within the housing market due to excessive individuals and corporate debt along with risky lending and borrowing practices. Over time, the market apparently began displaying more weaknesses as the global financial system was being affected. With this being said, this brings into question about who is actually to assume blame for this financial fiasco. It is extremely hard to just assign blame to one individual party as there were many different factors at work here. This paper will analyze how the stakeholders created a financial disaster and did nothing to prevent it as the credit rating agencies created an amount of turmoil due to their unethical decisions and costly mistakes.
The term ideological is defined as "a more or less consistent set of views as to the policies government ought to pursue." (Wilson, 116) I believe that I am ideological in my political thinking. I stand really strong on what I believe in and will always try to persuade people that my thinking is right. My opinion on spending more money on national security rather than welfare is strongly felt because I have been a victim where I suffered because the government spent too much money on welfare rather than national defense.
The history of Lehman Brothers (LBs) is dated back to 1844 when Henry Lehman and his two brothers established a small shop in Alabama (United States) to sell groceries and other commodities (Geisst, 2001). In the early 1900’s, they formed to a greater business company trading on the New York exchange market and the Cotton Exchange, which successfully promoted the family business to the retail giants with a partnership with Goldman and Sachs (Geisst, 2001; Wechsberg, 1966). Subsequently, the further opportunity raised in collaboration with some firms in the railway industry such as the Baltimore and Ohio railways, Chicago railways and others (Harward Business School, 2012). In 1975, the company achieved its success when it became the 4th largest investment bank in the US by merging with Kuhn, Loeb and Company, which boosted their financial activities in the financial market (Sloane, 1977). In the new line of business by diversifying their operations from a small shop via investments in the industry sectors, eventually they transformed to the company operating in the banking and brokerage (Geisst, 2001). Although LBs experienced remarkable successes and achievements, the housing market bubble in USA led to their collapse causing that in September 2008 the company filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions that triggered a negative flow of consequences (Caplan et al., 2010).
During the 1920s, approximately 20 million Americans took advantage of post-war prosperity by purchasing shares of stock in various securities exchanges. When the stock market crashed in 1929, the fortunes of many investors were lost. In addition, banks lost great sums of money in the Crash because they had invested heavily in the markets. When people feared their banks might not be able to pay back the money that depositors had in their accounts, a “run” on the banking system caused many bank failures. After the crash, public confidence in the market and the economy fell sharply. In response, Congress held hearings to identify the problems and look for solutions; the answer was found in the new SEC. The Commission was established in 1934 to enforce new securities laws that were passed with the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The two new laws stated that “Companies publicly offering securities must tell the public the truth about their businesses, the securities they are selling and the risks involved in the investing.” Secondly, “People who sell and trade securities must treat investors fairly and honestly, putting investors’ interests first.”2
The banks wanted their money from the brokers. The brokers wanted their money from the customers. The only way most customers could get the money was to sell the stock, and selling the stock depressed the market even more, increasing pressure all along the line. (Judith S. Baughman, Victor Bondi, Richard Layman, Tandy McConnell, and Vincent Tompkins)