1933 Banking Act Pros And Cons

1747 Words4 Pages

The 1933 Banking Act, also known as the Glass-Steagall Act in reference to the legislation’s sponsors Carter Glass and Henry B. Steagall, was a statue enacted by the 73rd United States Congress which created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and separated investment banking from commercial banking. The act established clear delimitations between commercial and investment banks, and made it illegal for them to operate in conjunction. Federal Reserve member banks were banned from dealing in non-governmental securities for customers, underwriting or distributing non-governmental securities, investing in non-investment grade securities for themselves, and affiliating with companies involved in such activities. Concurrently, investment banks were prohibited from accepting deposits. …show more content…

Consequently, the provisions to separate commercial banking from securities and investment firms were regarded as a way to diminish the risk associated with providing such deposit insurance. Although some historians argue that the depression itself is what caused the collapse of the banking system, in 1933 the general consensus was that banks had provoked the failure by engaging in shady and abusive practices with depositor’s money. Congressional hearings conducted in early 1933 seemed to indicate that bankers and brokers were guilty of “disreputable and seemingly dishonest dealings, and gross misuses of the public's trust” (“Understanding How”, 1998). The Glass Steagall act was the main legislative response of President Roosevelt’s administration to the unprecedented financial turmoil that was facing the nation in the middle of a deep depression. It was intended to regulate and stabilize the banking industry, reduce risk, and provide consumers with confidence in the financial

Open Document