Thank You For Not Smoking Clifford N. Lazarus Analysis

539 Words2 Pages

“Thank you for not smoking” is an article written by Clifford N Lazarus. Lazarus according to psychology today is a licensed psychologist and an institute director. In his article, he compared smoking laws to alcohol and gun control laws. He also tried to respond to those who thinks smoking is part of their constitutional right. Lazarus went in depth in explaining how smoking affects the people around the smoker, focusing on families. He talked in his article about third hand smoke, where he mentioned studies that show how harmful it can be. H defined poisonous smoke particles that cling to a smoker's clothes and hair. He used logic backed up by statistics to prove his point of view. His use of logos was apparent when he was comparing smoking laws to alcohol laws. Lazarus said that you cannot simply walk …show more content…

When comparing that data he gave, he said that smoking yearly kills four times as many people as alcohol and guns combined. He used logic to prove that laws against smokers are not strong enough, and government should take more actions to restrict smoking. Lazarus focused on economy too. He thinks that governments spend too much trying to clean the mess cigarettes done. Here, he is not mentioning littering, he said that CDC data shows that government spend around $96 billion in smoking-related health care costs. In addition to $97 billion loss of productivity due to premature death. As been mentioned, his use of logos was backed up by numbers to prove his point. Throughout his article, Lazarus appeals to the emotion of the reader many times. One obvious use of pathos was the part where he tried explain how smoking affect those who do not smoke. He talked about smoker’s families and the risk they are in. He thinks that by smoking, smokers violate other people rights of living in a clean environment. He said that smoking cannot be granted as a right because it harms

Open Document