Problems with measurement
The scientific quality of the SciTS is measured in the traditional scientific ways with an emphasis on conceptual validity, study design, methodological rigor, measurement of outcomes, and protection against biases (Boaz& Ashby, 2003; Lohr, 2004; Shavelson & Towne, 2002). However, the SciTS has additional criteria to measure including the quality and scope of the cross disciplinary integration as evidenced by new conceptual models and innovative methodological strategies (Stokols et al., 2006). In addition, team science requires assessment and measurement as to what impact the team science had on scientific discovery, clinical application, and policy perspectives (Stokols et al., 2006). Thus, the SciTS is focused not only on the scientific quality of the research, but i focuses on how the research was carried out as well.
In past years, the SciTS field has used retrospective and prospective case comparison studies to evaluate research teams (Stokols et al., 2008). Recently, the NCI has been implementing longitudinal bibliometirc and social network analyses to assess differences in productivity between single investigators and those working on trans-disciplinary teams (Vogel et al, 2013.; Stokols et al., 2008).
Although some have reported that trans-disciplinary collaboration is discouraged by the academic frameworks of the university tenure system (Burroughs Welcome Fund, 2013; Fiore, 2008; Schunn et al., 2006), UNC School of Nursing abides by the UNC Task Force Report on Future Promotion and Tenure Policies and Practices (2009), and encourages collaboration across disciplinary lines, not only in research, but service and education as well.
Relevance and importance of team science for patient safet...
... middle of paper ...
... Change, University of Technology.
Odell, M. (2005). Blackwell’s Nursing dictionary. Nursing in Critical Care (10)3: 157.
Ovretveit, J. (2011) Understanding the conditions for improvement: Research to discover which context influences affect improvement success, BMJ Quality and Safety 20(1), 18–23. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045955
Pellmar , T.C., & Eisenberg, L., eds. (2000). Bridging disciplines in the brain, behavioral, and clinical sciences. Washington DC: IOM/The National Academies Press.
Puga, F. Stevens, K.R., & Patel, D.I. (2013). Adopting best practices from team science in a healthcare improvement research network: The impact on dissemination and implementation Nursing Research and Practice 20(13), 1-7. doi:10.1155/2013/814360
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. RWJF active living research program.
Retieved from www.rwjf.org/applications/solicited/npo.jsp?FUND_ID
Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Psychology. (2nd ed., p. 600). New York: Worth Pub.
My team consists of four other people besides myself, Lauren Chojnaki, Alexa-Louise Patnode, and Jacobe Loewen, and Ryan Tyriver. Together, we are tasked with the mission to complete a stakeholder analysis regarding a specific organization and their structure. For this project to be completed successfully, it is important that all team members are able to cooperate with one another and are able to use their different strengths to create the best end product.
Kaplan, H. I., Sadock, B. J., & Grebb, J. A. (1994). Synopsis of psychiatry: behavioral sciences,
Recognition of the gap that exist between research finding and their application to practice is growing, DNP must be able to translate newly discovered relevant scientific knowledge into their provision of health care and navigate in the health care system to improve patient outcome. both educational pathway are completing one another, from research to practise , collaboration is an essential skill for all researcher and practitioner in the 21th century health care.
Passer, M., Smith, R., Holt, N., Bremner, A., Sutherland, E., & Vliek, M. (2009). Psychology; Science of Mind and Behaviour. (European Edition). New York.
Gall, S. B., Beins, B., & Feldman, A. (2001). The gale encyclopedia of psychology. (2nd ed.). Detroit, MI: Gale Group.
Ruff, R. (2003) A friendly critique of neuropsychology: facing the challenges of our future, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 18( 8), 847-864.
Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivry R.B., & Mangun, G.R. Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. W. W. Norton & Company (1998).
Gall, S. B., Beins, B., & Feldman, A. (2001). The gale encyclopedia of psychology. (2nd ed., pp. 271-273). Detroit, MI: Gale Group.
The development of knowledge requires a number of processes in order to establish credible data to ensure the validity and appropriateness of how it can be used in the future. For the healthcare industry, this has provided the ability to create and form new types of interventions in order to give adequate care across a of number of fields within the system. Research then, has been an essential part in providing definitive data, either by disproving previous beliefs or confirming newly found data and methods. Moreover, research in itself contains its own process with a methodological approach. Of the notable methods, quantitative research is often used for its systemic approach (Polit & Beck, 2006). Thus, the use of the scientific method is used, which also utilizes the use of numerical data (Polit & Beck). Here, researches make use of creating surveys, scales, or placing a numerical value on it subjects (Polit & Beck). In the end the resulting data is neutral and statistical. However, like all things its approach is not perfect, yet, it has the ability to yield valuable data.
Stuss and colleagues (2002) argue that clinical neuropsychology at its simplest is “the understanding of brain-behaviour links and their applications to clinical situations”. In their review of the history of clinical neuropsychology, they speak of three fields that have contributed to our current understanding of brain behaviour links including 1) behavioural neurology, 2) neuropsychiatry and 3) clinical neuropsychology. Within these disciplines, a range of techniques are used to investigate loca...
Quality improvement (QI) involves the regular and constant actions that enable measurable improvement in health care. QI results in enhanced health services, organizational efficiency, quality and safe care to patients, and desired health outcomes for individuals and patient populations (U. S. Department of Health and Human Service, 2011). A successful quality improvement program is patient-centered, a collaboration of teams, and uses data in systems. QI helps to develop a culture of excellence in nursing, identify and prioritize areas of improvement, promote communication and collaboration, collect and analyze data, and encourage continuous evaluation of systems and processes (American Academy
Boyd, D., Wood, E.G., Wood, S.E. (2014, 2011, 2008). Mastering the world of psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 128-129, 329-330, 335-340. Print.
Modern health care system is much more complex and this complexity has produced that we need the team-based delivery health system to provide the best possible care (Mitchell, Wynia, Golden, McNellis, Okun, Webb, Rohrbach, & Kohorn. 2012). I am certainly working in the team-based nursing environment which challenges me every day because I am still learning and training myself
When we think of the word team, individually many different ideas may come to mind about what a team really is. Some may think of an NFL team (Tennessee Titans), an NBA team (Sacramento Kings), or a NASA astronaut team with such pioneers as Edwin Aldrin, Jr. and Neil Armstrong as members. You might even think of the U.S. Navy, Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, or Marines as teams. In fact they all are, and they have a great deal in common as teams. However, for the purposes of this paper I will examine the characteristics of work teams, as they apply to organizations and I will supply answers to the following questions: What is a team? Where did the team concept come from? What are the types of teams? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having teams in organizations? What does it take to make a team effective?