Taxation Law in Australia Case 1: Hilary is a famous mountain climber, this is the reason why the Daily Terror Newspaper gain the interest to offer her $10,000 dollars to write her life story, but if she prefer to write in on her own without any help from a writer, she gains all the copyrights to claim the $10,000 dollars coming from the Daily Terror when the story is published. She also decided to sell the manuscript to the Mitchell Library for $5000 dollars and later she also receives $2000 dollars for selling several mountains climbing photographs. Based on the decision of Hilary to write the manuscript by herself, even if this is the first she has written a manuscript and based on the process of selling it to the Mitchell Library and receiving …show more content…
It is only that her son promises to pay for five years with the amount of $50,000 dollars. However, the son paid his mother for only two years with an added 5% of the borrowed money and with only a single cheque presented is a clear indication that the quality of expenditure and credit is not a recurring income, nor intended for profit making on the part of the parent. The mother even told her son that no interest is required. In the case of Brent v FC of T 71 ATC 4195, is also based on the rewards received based on the services provided, therefore it is an income from personal exertion. Just like the case of Hilary, when the wife of the great train robber, allows a media company the rights to publish her story, and she allows them for an interview. She was promised to receive $65,250, but during 1970, she only received $10,000, the High Court of Australia only charged her with the same amount she received as the assessable income (CCH New Zealand Ltd.,
Maria had spoken with Eva over the phone concerning the correct total amount of $60,000 for rendering decorating services provided by Eva. Maria had sent a letter of the telephone conversation stating that Eva agreed to take $60,000 in full satisfaction obligation under the contract. Although Eva, changed her mind when depositing the check in the bank, she legally entered a mutual agreement over the telephone where it resulted in a unliquidated debt, payment is lower than actual.
Australian Legal Case: The Mabo Case The Mabo case commenced in the late 70's about an Aborigine Eddie Mabo who fought for his land on Murray Island, part of the Torres Strait. The issue that started the court case was when Mr Mabo appealed for a permit from the Queensland Government to visit the island. His proposal was declineed so he was unable to return home to visit his homeland.
Clinton's main idea of the book is to in light the confusion on a category of American women in the nineteenth-century. Her significant benefaction of the work lies perhaps
A Constitution is a set of rules put in place to govern a country, by which the parliament, executive and judiciary must abide by in law making and administering justice. In many countries, these laws are easily changed, while in Australia, a referendum process must take place to alter the wording of the Constitution (Commonwealth of Australia, date unknown, South Australian Schools Constitutional Convention Committee 2001). Since the introduction of the Australian Constitution in January 1901, there have been sufficient proposals to alter and insert sections within the body to reflect the societal values of the day, ensuring the Constitution remains relevant to the Australian people. Although Constitutional reform can be made on a arrangement of matters, the latest protests on Indigenous recognition and racial references within the body of the Constitution has called into question the validity of racial inclusion, and whether amendments should be made to allow for recognition. This essay will focus on the necessity of these amendments and evaluate the likelihood of change through the process of referenda.
This essay will examine key aspects of the recent implementation of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) 2011, which is the largest overhaul in Consumer Law in Australia in the past twenty five years. The ACL replaces 20 existing State and Territory laws into one national law , the legislation was enacted in two main parts as Schedule 2 of the renamed Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (TPA) - Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) . Aforementioned this essay it will outline the key benefits of the implementation of the act. Furthermore it will critique the Act, whilst exploring the objectives of the legislation.
The merits of both the adversarial and inquisitorial system will be explored throughout this paper. The Australian rule of law best describes as all law should be applied equally and fairly. The five vital operations of the rule of law includes fairness, rationality, predictability, consistency, and impartially. The adversarial system adopts these operations by having a jury decide on the verdict and the judge being an impartial decision maker. In contrast, the inquisitorial system relies heavily on the judge. This can result in abusive power and bias of the judge when hearing evidence and delivering verdicts. The operations of the rule of law determine why the rule of law is best served by the adversarial system in Australia.
The taxation that occurred on the colonies after French and Indian War, the British Monarchy and Parliament came to the conclusion that the colonist where going to be held accountable for this debt to the crown in defending the colonies during the war. Parliament’s response to this position was to pass several acts as their effort to collect money in which they believed to be their justified right to collect. The long and expensive war that defended the colonies gave the crown the impression of the colonies where now indebted to them, further giving Parliament the belief of having the right place a tax on the colonies under the Parliamentary Acts of 1764. Leading the colonist to berate the acts and cry out “no taxation without representation”
Tax law changes every year. Laws are updated, loopholes are blocked and other modifications are generated. A few of these changes affect essentially each of the wage earners while others could impact primarily small businesses or higher-income taxpayers.
Australian laws change in various ways on a continuous basis. The federal and State legislatures can change laws when enacting legislation. This law could reflect on improvements or/and new social esteems in contemporary society. Legislation that is new or amended can indicate political choices and can be determined by organisations such as the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) or lobby groups.
A writer has only two things to sell: his words and his ideas. If you steal either, it’s as bad as stealing any other peddler’s stock-in-trade. Unlike other peddlers, though, the writer gives you permission to use his stock-in-trade at your will as long as you point out that the stuff originally belonged to him.
is yet to be passed by the Senate which means that the GST may not even
1. What is the difference between a. and a. The chosen book titled “Seneca Falls and the Origins of the Women’s Rights Movement” was written by Sally McMillen in 2008. It is a primary source, as long as its author for the first time opens the secrets of the revolutionary movement, which started in 1848 from the convention held by Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Stanton. It is not a secondary source, as long as information from the book appears for the first time.
shown by the way when she wrote as a narrator and the way she wrote as
had written the novel in hope it would be read by people of her day