Sustainable design has steadily become the architecture catch phrase of the day, being thrown around to make us aware that everything we “design” has an environmental burden. Many designers, architects and builders have installed the “idea of green” into their buildings to demonstrate a potential to improve performance and reduce costs through sustainable strategies. One of the main methods of creating sustainability in buildings is with passive design. It has been applied by architects and engineers to achieve highly thermally insulated structures with low energy use. With rising prices and political pressures energy economy has become a key feature in a lot of contemporary buildings. Green star is Australia’s primary “green” large building rating system, evaluating many different aspects of a building and its construction. It sets out to judge a building on its environmental merits and to see if it performs to world class standards of passive design, giving them a number to reflect its viability to be called green, with 6 being the top number. It is important for our learning environments to help us push contemporary ideas and expose its students to relevant topics, so the University of Adelaide set about to take these principles of passive and sustainable design and create Australia's first 6 star, Green star rated education building, Innova21.
Depictive criticism
static
Innova21 is located within the University of Adelaide's grounds, directly opposite the eastern side of the Barr Smith Library. As you enter the university grounds from north terrace you are surrounded by a plethora of old classical buildings that funnel you deeper into the campus. You start to see that these buildings act as a face or facade of the campus,...
... middle of paper ...
...t the chimneys with the use of strong vertical lines and obvious energy saving properties.
Innova21 is a simple well designed building, not bold in form, but bold in statement. It puts the university and Adelaide in the forefront of sustainable educational buildings in Adelaide. Its simple facade makes sure it does not detract from the message that it gives, but enhances the ideas and concepts which are littered throughout this building. The smart use of program and circulation has made it a very functional building for students and at the same time creating a structure that minimises energy use. Now that this building has made a clear statement maybe in the future buildings with strong environmental focus could also mix with bold forms, pushing the language that structures like this have formed and bringing us to a new step in Australian “green” architecture.
LEED, or Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design, is a certification program for green buildings with stringent requirements for building energy efficient and environmentally responsible structures. Some requirements of this program include specific building materials, smart grid capable, gray water reclamation systems, green space minimums, high levels of insulation and low thermal transfer glass (US Green Building Council). Green buildings are a must if we are to sustain our current level of growth. Despite the higher initial cost of these buildings, the long term energy savings make these buildings a smarter choice for
When first getting off of the plane at Sydney’s international airport, there was a familiar ambience that seemed to float around the series of rooms and halls to get to the exit. The airport seemed just like any other with the terminal, customs, and baggage claims. It’s when I walked outside that I noticed an unfamiliar, but refreshing, sense of place. I couldn’t quite place my finger on it at first. It might have been the jetlag, or just being tired from the long flight from America, but I definitely knew something was different about the architecture in Australia compared to other places I have studied about in America, such as Chicago.
It is also the result of the belief of the architect that the building should not oppose the environment. By constructing the same material in a more environmentally efficient way, the building is light in appearance but it doesn’t in functionality. The titles of some books on this architect who lead a new Australian domus in the form of a long and narrow, light-weight, roof work, comparable in its sheltering function to the bower of a tree or, in more morphological terms, to the turned up collar of an overcoat that shelters from the wind while subtly opening its front towards the sun, show the stubbornly prudent aesthetics of lightness: Leaves of Iron, Touch this Earth Lightly, Feathers of
Sustainability is an issue that everyone should be concerned about. If the planet Earth is going to exist, as we know it, everyone should wake up and do their part to help achieve a greater level of sustainability. In my English 101 class we learned about the issue of sustainability. Many different topics were discussed and researched throughout the course of the semester. Overall, I think that the sustainability project has been a learning and enlightening experience for everyone in this class. Many more things can be done next semester, since the groundwork has been laid to continue this project for time to come.
The world is developing every day and we continue to discover new and innovative ways to better our quality of life. A trend that everyone seems to be focused on is saving the environment, which is also known as sustainable living. Not only does this apply to our lifestyle and environment, but it also translates into design. Sustainable living is becoming more popular around the world and is a lifestyle using skillful and sensitive design. It eliminates negative environmental impact and requires renewable resources. We each have decided to research different furniture companies to broaden our knowledge of the innovative practices used in each company. Throughout our paper we will introduce each of our companies and the products and practices they use to produce sustainable furniture. Our research will show that sustainable furniture design is beneficial to consumers by allowing them to live a more environmentally friendly lifestyle as their manufacturers develop innovative ways to make renewable furniture.
In 2013, Architect Magazine, ranked MIT’s Architectural program #2 among graduate schools in the USA. As it builds up its prestigious reputation in Architecture, MIT has tried to inspire its students to be creative and fanciful in their projects through the unique buildings that they have on campus. The Stata Center, an academic complex designed by Frank Gehry , originally got a lot of attention, because of its novel appearance. Critics said it was a good act of self-expression, and its complex design was a good representation of the intellectual capacity of the scientists that were going to be working there. Likewise, Simmons Hall -a residence hall designed by Steven Holl- finally got the entire freshman class to live on campus, which was something MIT desperately needed. These buildings, among many others at the MIT campus, are built precisely as inspirations for their architectural students. As Thomas P. Hughes - a professor at MIT- once noted, MIT has celebrated their buildings as “expressing the inventiveness, energy, and excellence of the people within them.” However, it certainly seems as though the buildings were built solely focused on their appearance, as they have turned out to be neither efficient nor cheap. These two buildings have caused so many problems that they have not proven to be a good representation of the innovative minds at MIT. Even though the appearance of the buildings represents forward-thinking architecture, they nevertheless result in extra construction time, cost inefficiencies, and experiential and structural malfunctions.
Moving on from the organizational issues to the financial aspects, an analysis aiming to prove if sustainability is measurable or not will be provided, discussion based on IKEA’s sustainability report of 2015th year.
...ug and Sørensen, 2009).indeed, Moe (2006), exploring the Norwegian construction industry, has noted that there are no established standards for measuring the energy efficiency nor the environmental soundness of buildings. Therefore, developers who want to pursue a sustainable solution are free to choose what criteria they want to apply, resulting in sustainability, including energy efficiency, being shaped by local interpretations, priorities and interest (Moe, 2006). Moe (2006) also highlight that energy technologies are often selected based on how strongly they symbolise energy efficiency, rather than being selected based on actual calculations of their energy performance. An example of that are heat pumps which are selected for their iconic status as sustainable technologies, even though other technologies may have provided greater energy efficiency (Moe, 2006).
Sustainable design seeks to reduce negative impacts on the environment, the health and comfort of building occupants, thereby improving building performance. The basic objects of sustainability are to reduce consumption of non-renewable resources, minimal waste, and create healthy, productive environments (“Sustainable Design”). Focusing primarily on the sustainable design principles, there are five, including: low-impact materials, energy efficiency, quality and durability, design for reuse and recycling, and renewability. As sustainability appears to become the necessary trend in architecture, the question concerning the cost versus outcome of “going green” really an investment or a waste of time and money comes to mind. With our research provided below, we believe the expenses may truly be with the investment in the end.
The perfect green building would protect the environment which surround the project site, and could be used as a building that is going to achieve a purpose. The construction and operation levels of the green building will help to have a healthy environment without disrupting the land, water, energy and resources used inside the building and around the building in the project site; this is the actual definition of the green building.
en designing for the public, architects and engineers must take into consideration the economic, environmental and social impacts of their design. The three categories; people, planet and profit are the fundamental principles of sustainable architecture. Architecture firm Cox Architecture joined an alliance with the architecture firm Architects 61 and engineering firm Arup to perfectly address the three categories of responsible design while also managing to create an entirely new category of bridge.The Helix, is the first of its kind. Located in the heart of Singapore's Mariana Bay, it acts as a cultural figurehead symbolizing the re-urbanization of Singapore's cultural centres. The Helix geometry is inspired by the unique and universally known shape of DNA. The purpose of the pedestrian bridge is to literally and figuratively connect the cultures of the region and provide a common ground which all could appreciate. The design was intended to be unique to the region and has been quickly recognized as a modern architectural-engineering masterpiece. This report will discuss the unique traits of the design that make the bridge architecturally and environmentally innovative. METHOD One of the main purposes of the bridge was to achieve a higher standard in sustainable bridge design. This was appropriately addressed by the efficient selection of materials and geometry. The entire structural system of the design consists of only stainless steel. A stainless steel skeleton was made economically possible due to the maximization of material function. The bridge behaves like two opposing springs, in which the outer helix transports the load to the base supports and the inner helix supports the deck. As each spiral has a...
... architectures would led to a more organic organization beneficial to the people that choose to make their lives in this city. Although this model of a sustainable city is not a perfectly closed loop, it lays the foundation for one that is. Over time, with constantly evolving and improving technology and new methods of design from the scale of products to buildings, the gaps in the loop could be closed, and a “true” sustainable city could be fully realized.
Implementation of green concepts has been significant not only in design engineering but also in construction. Therefore the knowledge about green design has been a very important fact for the sustainable development in civil engineering. Concepts such as green buildings, carbon foot print, ecological foot print and LEED rating system have helped to achieve sustainable development for civil engineering
Yan, J. & Plainiotis, S. (2006): Design for Sustainability. Beijing, China: Architecture and Building Press.
Sustainable fashion is among the developing design viewpoint and movement of sustainability with the main objective of establishing a structure, which can be sustained for the foreseeable future in terms of conservationism and social accountability. This implies that all the products made are developed with much consideration to the environmental and social influence all through its overall lifetime encompassing its carbon imprint. It is revealed that sustainable fashion is not just a short time trend but one, which could endure for a long time (Fletcher 76). Beforehand, conservationism used to represent itself in the fashion world through the contribution of a portion of transactions of products for a charitable reason.