Susan B Anthony Women's Right To The Suffrage Analysis

632 Words2 Pages

“... I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizens rights.” (Anthony). Susan B. Anthony’s speech, “Women’s Right to the Suffrage,” was the most compelling speech because she informed her readers of how she didn’t break the law by casting a vote. She proves this by explaining how women are human beings whom deserve their rights, the men oppressing her are in fact the people who broke the law, and the white men have become a hate group. The central idea of her speech is that she didn’t violate a law, rather, the law violates her rights. The most important main idea is that any citizen should have their rights and to be a citizen is to be a human being living (legally) in the US, found in paragraphs six and seven. Also, she communicates that women are in fact people, thus more citizens of the United States who are just as deserving of their rights just as much as any man. “Being persons, then, women are citizens…” (Anthony). Under the classification of inalienable rights is the right to vote which is what she was incriminated for. “Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States,” (Anthony). Additionally, the rhetorical devices she used are rhetorical question and sentence structure, these give off ethos …show more content…

“... a hateful oligarchy of sex…” (Anthony). This develops the central idea by explaining how the women were treated poorly -- beyond poorly, actually. “Which ordains all men sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord and rebellion into every home of the nation,” (Anthony). She used pace and vocabulary as rhetorical devices, she uses large and powerful vocabulary and the pace she used nails it in your brain. “Which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household…”

Open Document