Have you ever been in a position where you had to waver your chances of survival, not knowing if you’d make it out alive or not? Countless times people are found in these types of situations on their own accord, or by accident, but who would be to blame? Many may feel like people who are in life or death situations should not be responsible for their actions, but to what extent do they become accountable for the situation.
When people are found in these types of situations are there for a reason- whether it was on purpose or on accident. They should know exactly what they’re getting themselves into, therefore, they should pay the price and be held accountable. In “The Value of Sherpa Life” the author states that “ Himalayan climbing is understood to be
…show more content…
Not many people would really put them in danger and have the intentions of doing harm. In the article “ Survival is Your Own Responsibility” it states that “ Most accidents are caused by bad judgement compounded by weather and remoteness. Many accidents are a result of people making bad decisions because of a lack of knowledge or complacency, An examination of climbing accidents in Alaska show a great number of rescues involve people who have misjudged the consequences of their decisions and underestimated the power of it’s weather.” The people may have the knowledge of what they are doing, but still decided to take the risk, not predicting what may happen. Many people are understood when they could not have known that the actions they have made would lead to injury, or harmful situations. So what extent could someone really be held responsible for being in certain situations? It would be morally wrong to blame someone for being in a life or death situation if outside forces, including nature were the cause of the event, not even the result of their
In the end, of course, there is no one person or agency responsible for the accident. The accident is just that -- an accident, one of those frighteningly random events that occasionally disrupt the even flow of daily life, underscoring the innate precariousness of life, our susceptibility to grief and loss and hurt.
In an emergency situation where the only the bystander is present, the bystander might fear for their safety but all of the pressure to intervene is focused on the bystander increasing the chances of intervention. In a similar situation but there are several observers present, the pressure to intervene is shared among all the observers. None of the witnesses feels solely responsible and this results in no action from the witnesses. In terms of blame, individual behavior is driven on consequences and this influences a bystander to act. In a group, blame cannot be assigned to a single individual resulting in inaction. In a case where observes are known to be present but their behavior cannot be observed, a bystander can assume the observers have intervened so the bystander’s intervention is unnecessary. The researchers began their experiment with the hypothesis that the more bystanders present at an emergency; the less likely any one bystander will
The survivor takes the responsibility for the death of their loved one is caused by survivor's guilt. “The Seventh Man” by Haruki Murakami is a short story about a boy losing his best friend during a storm and he goes through a tragic time. The text states “ I stayed away from my home town for over forty years.”(Murakami pg.141) This shows that he had to stay away for many years to get over his guilt. This proves survivors should not feel survivor's guilt.
Jeannette Walls had a horrific childhood that truly brought out the survivor in her. Jeannette had troubles with her family, friends and siblings but she was not hindered by the difficult situations and the choices that she had to make. In order to survive she to had be resourceful and use what she had to her advantage and also learn to adapt to any situation. Through it all she had the drive and purpose of a true survivor. Her survival tools of Ingenuity, Adaptability and Purpose helped her to grow into the person she is today.
For every year, there will be six mountain climbers who will succumb to the harsh climb of Everest, and that’s about seventeen times the rate of death caused by skiing and snowboarding accidents together all around the world. Mountain climbing, skiing, and snowboarding are all adventurous and hard-to-participate sports. But why are there so many deaths created by mountain climbing? And in all of those deaths there are about fifteen guides, and mountain rangers, most of them died to help the injured climbers. However, there are more than four thousands successful climbs made by varieties of people from young to old. So should people have the right to rescue services when they put themselves at risk? To me, people absolutely do have the right to rescue services when they put themselves at risk because that is what rescue services are for, to help people when they need it. And it also depends on their current situation, which may affect their abilities to make a decision.
It was stated that whether or not people help depends on a series of interconnected events and decisions. They must first notice what’s happening, understand that it is an emergency and accept personal responsibility. When this fails to happen that is called the bystander effect (Carpenter & Huffman, 2008, p. 422).
Social immobility has been a problem for many people, whether they are citizens of United States of America or immigrants from another country, this is something people confront from time to time in their lives. Janie from Under the Feet of Jesus by Zora Neale Hurston, and Estrella from Their Eyes were Watching God by Helena Maria Viramontes are both examples of characters restricted by the intersectionalism of their gender or social and racial class. Through the two class texts mentioned above, social immobility will be further expounded in the context of characters such as Estella and Janie, and it will also be explored as a force that leads to the restriction and/or the loss of innocence for the characters.
Several years ago, I was getting out of my vehicle in the busy parking lot where I worked. I slipped on ice, my legs went in opposite directions and I fell hard on my right kneecap. While I was laying on the ice, a man walked up and asked “Are you okay? Do you need help?’ Through my tears, I said yes that I needed help and he just walked away. I eventually found my phone in my purse and called a co-worker who I knew was already inside. Luckily, I worked across the street from the hospital and a member of the rescue squad saw me laying in the parking lot and ran over to help. I was eventually transported to the hospital across the street and found out that I had broken my kneecap. “LaTane and Darley (1970) developed a five-step tree that describes how people decide whether to intervene in an emergency.” (Aronson, Wilson, Akert & Sommers, 2016). The five steps include: (1) Notice the event, (2) Interpret the event as an emergency, (3) Assume responsibility, (4) know appropriate form of assistance, (5) and Implement decision. (Aronson et al., 2016). It was obvious that the first man that asked if I needed assistance noticed me laying on the ground and interpreted the event as an emergency, but is appears that he did not want to assume responsibility. Even though he asked if I was okay and needed help, it seems that he never actually called
According to the American Psychological Association, resilience is the process of adjusting enough in the presence of adversity, trauma, tragedy, threats or major sources of stress such as financial and workplace problems, family/ relationship problems, and severe health problems or workplace and financial stressors (American Psychological Association, 2013).
Personal responsibility is the idea that people have full control over their actions. Things like basic health and hygiene can be seen as personal responsibility because they are actions that are carried out independently. In my life, I don’t have to shoulder responsibilities all by myself because my sister helps me balance things out. Although I am still solely responsible for the outcome of my decisions, it is easier for me to act reasonable with help by my side. Personal responsibility to me is the act of taking care of yourself while owning up to any mistakes you made.
What makes a crime a crime would some ones responsibility level be different if there mental state isn’t stable? In most cases the person committing a crime intended to do something that the state legislature or Congress has stated that it is wrong."mens rea" is a concept is based on a belief that people should be punished only when they have acted in a way that makes them morally blameworthy. In the legal system people who purposely take part in the behavior that is prohibited by a law are responsible. "Ordinary" negligence is not a crime. For example, careless drivers are not usually unlawfully prosecuted if they cause an accident, they may have to pay civil costs to those harmed by their reach less behavior.
Darley, J.M., Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8 (4), 377-383.
This research is guided by two major theories. First, Transactional Theory, which is a widely accepted theory of coping developed by Richard Lazarus and Susan Folkman. Second, the Control Theory developed by Charles Carver and Michael Scheier.
...Some ensues naturally, while some are man-made. It is impossible to control every outcome, but little education and pre-planning can help any human being in becoming more confident and skilled in coping with the situation. Yearly, the Red Cross teaches millions of people, ranging from youth to professional rescuers.
I have a very fulfilling feeling about what I have been able to accomplish in my life so far. I want the absolute best for myself and those close to me. I often go above and beyond to help those around me succeed and be the best version of themselves that they can possibly be.