Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The following is conceptualized to be a component of the authoritarian personality
Authoritarian personality essay
Studies of how political ideologies relate to personality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Authoritarian Spector is a compelling book by the social psychologist Bob Altemeyer, that discusses the different aspects of the authoritarian personality, all based on both his research and the research of others. Altemeyer makes the claim that different behaviors, “trusting Nixon during Watergate, hating homosexuals, opposing abortion” (Altemeyer 45) are all linked through authoritarianism, all the while reminding the reader that there are exceptions to these behaviors. The authoritarian personality falls along a spectrum rather than a cut and paste personality. The author of this book does not delve deeply into why these behaviors are linked to the authoritarianism, unless the reason is itself because they are authoritarian. He does; however, provide an extensive number of personality traits that one can identify, and possess a correlation, strong or otherwise, with the authoritarian personality. …show more content…
In Florida, an anti-abortionist shot and killed a doctor; supporters said he did a good thing (Altemeyer 1). Americans pleaded for stricter gun control after a gunman shot twenty-four people and killed five on a train to Long Island; the NRA opposed any and all new laws (Altemeyer 2). Even after twenty-five years, different, newer versions of these stories have appeared in the news. In the case of the first story there have been many attacks on planned parenthood and even attempts in changing policies when it comes to abortion and whether woman even have the right to this procedure. With the second case, there has been shootings in movie theaters, night clubs, music festivals, churches, and even schools, every year. These stories, both past and present, make me wonder who these people are who are refusing change and why they have the views they
Tragedy after tragedy, people find themselves mourning over the lives lost. And over and over again, they look back to see how they could have prevented it. People continue to argue and constantly debate what actions should be taken, and while doing so, more and more people lose their lives at the hands of gun violence. It’s clear to see that not much has been done to keep these weapons out of the wrongs hands: the shootings at Columbine High School and Virginia Tech have shown that. What would happen if there were to be another devastating shooting to occur? How would people react? Or would they just argue some more, while the wrong people can still easily get a hold of guns? The only way they can ever gain control of anything is by controlling the source of the problem, where people are able to freely purchase guns without restrictions. In order to reduce gun-related crime, unlicensed gun sellers should be required to run background checks on their customers.
In his article “Gun debate? What gun debate?” Mark O 'Mara discuses the controversial issue of gun control. O’Mara takes the tragic school shooting in Oregon as an opportunity to voice his opinion on the debate of guns. He clearly states his position and explains that gun violence has increased enormously because of the lack of command by the government and support from the public to speak out against it. O’Mara claims the issue is no longer a debate because it is so evident that guns have become a significant problem in this country and therefore actions must be taken to control and govern gun laws. In his article he attempts to raise awareness to the severity of the issue and tries to persuade his readers to take a stance against gun violence
In this essay, I will define authoritarianism and discuss the differences and similarities between Adorno et al.’s and Altemeyer’s approaches towards authoritarianism. Authoritarianism refers to the obedience and strict adherence to rules and figures of authority, as well as this, an authoritarian personality can be characterised by hostility towards groups or individuals who differ from what they perceive as normal (The Open University, 2015, p23).
Americans are faced with a huge problem of violence in the streets, these streets have become a place where old people are beaten for their social security checks, where little women are attacked and raped, where teen aged thugs shoot it out for some turf to sell their illegal drugs, and finally where small children everyday are caught in the way of bullets during drive by shootings. We try to ignore the criminals in our society and how they hurt it, but we shouldn’t. We should take actions to stop these acts of crazy people. And people try, but the hard work of some misguided individuals to stop the legal ownership of guns doesn’t really affect the problem at all, and takes the guns from the innocent citizens, who simply want means of self defense.
The gun control enthusiasts state that the open carry of these firearms threaten the safety of not just the customers of Starbucks but also it’s employees. They also argue that supporters of open carried firearms are insensitive to the sentiments of the families affected by the Sandy Hook shooting. However, counter protestors state otherwise. They state that they are simply exercising their right as Americans to bear arms. They also argue that it is the choice of the
In today 's society gun violence is a growing epidemic that is at an alarming rate. This paper will highlight the Brady’s Campaign to End Gun Violence influence, and impact on our government. Also it’s important to understand how our government deals with reform, and change in society 's views as well as the theories that are behind it. Unlike the other two theories of American government views on interest groups in this paper, interest groups fit into the idea of Pluralism the most realistically. In our government it’s relevant that the top 10% of interest groups make an affect on law reform compared to the average voter in America. The easiest way to get your point across is with money, this is seen in an article posted at The Washington Post about NRA’s major money influenced opposing agenda. The National Rifle Association’s PAC’s donations are astronomical compared this campaign, this is shown not only in the figure of money but in the list of politicians that are lobbied by this organization alone which is extensive. Not forgetting its influence and power in the House of Representatives and the Senate that follows as well. Under the idea of Elite theory, interest groups are the face for the economic elite in our government. At the end of the day, with so many interest groups fighting over gun legislation it seems to be at a stand still. That’s where hyperpluralism comes into power, and it’s because of the vast majority of opposing ideologies that slow or simply stop our government from governing efficiently. Furthermore this theory seems to explain our government perfectly as it can be a mix of the other two theories, being how our government runs and the lengthy process a bill must go through to officially become law. If t...
Gun control is a very controversial topic in both the United States and around the world. America in particular has been a battleground for debate on the subject in recent years. The debate is centered around two broad contradicting viewpoints regarding the answer to gun violence. David Kopel, who is an American author, attorney, and current research director of the Independence Institute in Colorado, identifies the pro-gun crowd as critics of gun control who believe that it violates the right to keep and bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and by forty-three States Constitutions (Kopel, “Hold Your Fire” par. 6). The other side of the argument consists of people who Kopel describes as well meaning Americans who believe that the answer to gun crime is gun control (Kopel, “Hold Your Fire” par. 4).
Although my voting patterns have become somewhat more conservative in recent years, I remain in my heart of hearts a 1960s Humphrey Democrat concerned with the plight of those most vulnerable in American society-minorities, the poor, the elderly, and single women-groups whose day-to-day realities are often overlooked in our public policy debates, people whose lives too often go unnoticed by our intellectually timid chattering classes. This is happening in the public debate over the right to bear arms. For the nation’s elites, the Second Amendment has become the Rodney Dangerfield of the Bill of Rights, constantly attacked by editorial writers, police chiefs seeking scapegoats, demagoging politicians, and most recently even by Rosie O’Donnell, no less. It is threatened by opportunistic legislative efforts, even when sponsors acknowledge their proposed legislation would have little impact on crime and violence.
A psychological construct called the authoritarian personality believes that a person’s upbringing can result in intolerance as an adult. The rigid personality type dislikes people who are different. “A child with an authoritarian upbringing obeyed and then later treated others as he or she had been raised (Schaefer 39).
In today’s society, gun control is currently a topic of debate in the United States. It seems as though almost every day the media is reporting the latest shooting or crime committed with a firearm. The acts of gun violence have reached far and wide, attacking even the places considered the safest, such as schools and churches. In the last 20 years, there have been numerous school shootings across the U.S., coupled with other serious acts of gun violence. These tragedies have greatly affected public opinion on gun control and interpretation of the Constitution’s Second Amendment. Recent school shootings, including those at Columbine High School in Colorado and Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, have caused some Americans to adopt a more liberal philosophy in regards to gun control, while some have upheld a more
stop mass shootings, both gun control groups and pro-gun groups backed plans that can be described as unconstitutional people control." The New American 2013: 10. Academic OneFile. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.
Even though authoritarian and permissive parenting may have some minor similarities they are remarkably different from one another in their approach to raising children. One of the most striking differences is that of expected social behaviors. Authoritarian parents expect and require strict adherence to proper manners, often to an extreme! Demonstrating manners in all circumstances is a sign of obedience and respect within this parent-child relationship. This act of obedience may also be expressed in a formal style of communication rather than a casual style both to parents and others. “Yes Sir”, “No Sir”, “Please”, and “Thank You” are words of common...
There will always be controversy in a nation that has a population of over 300 million, but gun control seems to slide into news coverage often. Recently, in Florida, a gunman used an AR-15 to shoot and kill 17 people, 14 of which were students. Prior to that, in Oregon, 10 people were killed in a shooting that took place in Umpqua Community College. It has become apparent that something must change to stop more lives from being lost, but there is a question that the lawmakers of America need to answer first: how can the shootings be stopped while letting the people keep their rights to bear arms? When new laws concerning guns are implemented, fear arises in the American people’s minds that a piece of their freedom
Researches have concluded that “Authoritarian parenting styles generally lead to children who are obedient and proficient, but they rank lower in happiness, social competence and self-esteem” (Cherry)....
Authoritarian-parents who are punitive and focus on gaining a child's obedience to parental demands rather than responding to the demands of the child.Authoritarian parenting styles give little to no options to a child. What the parent says goes. It is a rigid approach to raising children that may have been most effective in times of great famine or toil. It was used most commonly in large, traditional families in which the father was the patriarch, and everyone else was called to follow his command. Times have changed greatly since. Doctors see a problem with this approach in modern times,it creates a distance between parent and child in which the child doubts the parent's love for him. It is based on punishment, which can easily create anger.