Summary Of Mexifornia By Victor Hanson

1053 Words3 Pages

In the early twenty-first century, there was a continued concern on immigration in the United States that focused primarily on the immigration of Mexicans across the border into the U.S., especially California. Already many white native Californians began to notice a change in the surrounding culture as more Mexican immigrants entered the country. This change inspired many to express their thoughts on this transition of culture and society, including Victor Hanson, author of “Mexifornia.” Hanson speaks from his own experience as a farmer in Selma, California, dealing with whether Mexican immigrants are a racial group attempting to maintain their own identity within American culture or a people striving to assimilate and blend into American …show more content…

culture. Hanson explains that the complexity of the issue comes from the proximity of Mexico to America, government troubles, race problems and a confused sense of chauvinism for Mexico. Despite the multiple components to the issue addressed by Hanson, the essay does not persuade the reader to believe Mexican assimilation into American culture is the simple solution to the problem of immigration as he claims. Hanson argues that previous immigrant groups have successfully integrated into American culture but the Mexican immigrant resistance to do so has meant this latest wave of immigration is a negative influence on the country. At its heart, this is a racist argument, blaming the inevitable influx of Mexican people into the U.S. due to economic forces on their language and culture and an unwillingness to become …show more content…

All the problems associated with immigration, Hanson argues, can be blamed upon their resistance to adapt to American ideals, culture and the English language; again a compelling argument that leaves America and assimilated Americans blameless. Hanson’s simplistic outline of how those in the past have assimilated is persuasive yet the lack of details and exclusion of other economic factors put into question the validity of his point. His descriptions of other immigrant groups are stereotypical and he uses broad brushstroke descriptions to describe more complicated situations. His perception is that all other immigrants have learned English and improved themselves culturally by assimilating. He consistently looks down upon Mexican immigrant’s attempt to maintain their own culture and language without clearly linking it to the poverty and crime he complains

Open Document