Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership style
Leadership styles and their application
Leadership styles and their application
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leadership style
Leadership is defined as the action of guiding an individual or group of people. Effective leaders shape the behavior and thought process of the individuals around them. As a result, the success of an organization is often impacted by the leadership style and approach of its leaders. Even when engaging with multiple people, impactful leaders maintain their own style of leadership but occasionally change their approach based on the motivational needs of each individual. However, regardless of the style, leadership within an organization is designed to drive the performance of their employees and it is done through proficient communication. This guidance influences the culture of an organization, which subsequently, helps to shape its leaders. …show more content…
According to the Tannenbaum-Schmidt leadership continuum, this would categorize Sue’s leadership style is less about the influence of her authority and more about creating an environment that cultivates the autonomy of our team members. However, this leadership approach is developed through trust and dependency. Without the foundation and relationship building with her team, Sue is much less trusting. For example, when a new member is hired to join our team, we notice a shift the autonomy she allows to all members. As referenced by Tannenbaum and Schmidt, the situation can be a significant determining factor in Sue’s decision to seek team member participation (Lumpé, …show more content…
Dependent on the individual or situation, an effective leader must be able to adapt their leadership approach (MindTools, 2013). Hersey and Blanchard made a distinction in the levels of maturity that can be engaged in situational leadership; telling, selling, participating, and delegating (MindTools, 2013). Sue validates this understanding with the shift mentioned previously. A new team member still has considerable amount to learn when starting. In this case, Sue shifts between the telling and selling style to be able to provide beneficial instruction and monitor their work. Having the appropriate amount of support and guidance helps to leads to the shift between participating and delegating, which depends on the task that Sue assigns to the team
The situational leadership theory states that leaders use different styles and strategies depending on the situation. There are two models that support this theory. The Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness states that an “effective leadership occurs only when there is an ideal match between the leader’s style and the group’s work situation” (pg
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B., (2007). The leadership challenge, (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
believes group members are not as ready as they should be. Here leadership style focuses on helping these team members develop confidence and trust in their own abilities.
The research evidence supports the theory that leadership helps shape culture; culture in turn shapes leadership and they both drive performance. Schein (2010) asserts that cultures begin with leaders who impose their own values and assumptions on a group. If that group is successful and the assumptions come to be taken for granted, we then have a culture that will define for later generations of members what kinds of leadership are acceptable. The culture now defines leadership. But as the group runs into adaptive difficulties, as its environment changes to the point where some of its assumptions are no longer valid, leadership comes into play once more. The leadership is now the ability to step outside the culture that created the leader
An organizations is comprised of multiple components that must work together harmoniously for that organization to become, and remain, productive and successful. Two of these components are the organization’s culture and leadership. The culture of an organization is defined as the set of beliefs, norms and values that shape how members of that organization interact with each with one another and those outside of the organization (Jones, 2012, p. 179). This culture is shaped by the traditions celebrated by the organization, the accepted behaviors, and both the written and unwritten values. Leadership within an organization is charged with managing and directing both the organization and its workforce towards organizational objectives.
Leadership is defined by Armstrong (2012) as a process of inspiring people to do their best in order to achieve the desired result, this involves developing and communicating a vision for the future, motivating people and securing their engagement. So, the efficiency in resources mobilization, allocation, utilization and enhancement of organizational performance depends to a large extent on leadership styles, among other factors (Obiwuru et al., 2011). A leadership style refers to a specific manners applied by a leader to motivate his or her subordinates to accomplish the objectives of the organization. Okumbe (1998) founding on leadership conducted at the University of Iowa USA in 1993 investigated the impact of the three common leadership
A few styles that fall under situational leaders are supportive, participative and achievement oriented. The supportive role is best used when a person is unsatisfied and needs affiliation (Northouse, 2016). This is where the coaching approach will work the best. Participative
This week we learned one of the most vital thing in leadership management. That is, a leader must change his/her leadership styles depending on the situation. For example, the role theory suggests that a leader’s behavior depends on his/her perceptions of the situation. It also suggests that people usually define the roles for themselves and others based on social learning. They then form expectation about the roles and will subtly encourage others to act within the role expectations they have for them. So, in most situations, it would make sense to give followers task autonomy. By allowing an individual some control over what he/she does, he/she might be more motivated to participate and give input in the work place. However, if the job does require interdependence, it would be best to encourage team work instead. This might lead to higher creativity and better cohesiveness in the work place.
When leadership style in the team is analysed from the perspective of the connection to the power that the leader exerts over his followers, three main leadership styles emerge: autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire. (Barr & Dowding, 2012) In the democratic style, the leader encourages followers to interact and contribute to the decision making process; on the other hand, in an autocratic style, the leader exercises ultimate power in decision making, controlling rewards and punishments. (Barr & Dowding, 2012)
Leadership has been defined in different ways, a definitaion of leadership that would be most commonly accepted would be “the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organization…”(House et al., 1999, p. 184 as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 19). After a comprehensive review of different leadership literature, Stogdill (1974, p. 259, as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 18) concluded that “There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept." Leadership can be viewed from two different angles one is shared influence process and other as a specialized role. Researcher who view leadership as a specialized role consider attributes as a factor in selecting a designated leader. On the contrast, theorist who emphasises on influence process considers “Leadership” as a social process or a pattern of relationship.
Leadership, as defined by Organizational Behaviour: Understanding and Managing Life at Work, is “the influence that particular individuals exert on the goal achievement of others in an organizational context” . Leadership is commonly held as a key component of any organization, be it in the private or public sector, and is often seen as the reason for successes achieved by an organization. Despite this however, it is also possible for an argument to be made that the presence of leadership can lead to a declination in company effectiveness, and ultimately lead to widespread failure in an organization. The main cause that allows for both these statements to be considered true is the fact that leadership stems from the ability of the leader to
Although the concept of leadership and culture for a company has been around since the early 18th century, the ways that companies structure their leadership and culture can vary based on the business. Companies have to use different techniques to ensure that the leadership and culture are aligned. The evolution of leadership and culture entering companies has allowed employees structure around leadership exceptions and the climate in which the exceptions will need to be met. There are different industries in which business is conducted. For this reason employers will need to be aware of the leadership style and business culture to find ways keep their companies operating in a cohesive manner.
Organizational effectiveness is directly related to the leaders within the organization, who have the innate ability to achieve the vision, mission, and values through developing high performance and influence of the employees. Research suggests that effective leadership can impel the process improvement of performance, maintain a viable gain and is a powerful foundation of organization development (Jing, & Avery, 2016). The heart of leadership begins with the personal qualities, beliefs, and influence of the leader. Effective leaders create strong relationships with their employees which increases their influence to develop successful organizations (Aleksic, 2016). Throughout the years, there has been and continues to be extensive research
Many people associate leadership with a specific job title or form of power within an organization. However, through personal experience, I have concluded that leadership can come in many forms and position as well as from multiple sources of roles and job titles both with and without power. Based on the definition of leadership, anyone can be considered a leader as long as they have the ability to influence people to achieve a particular result or goal which benefits the organization or group as a whole. Individuals with a secure sense of self and understanding, acceptance of diversity within an organization tend to be the strongest leaders that not only make others want to follow, but they also encourage other leaders to gravitate to their