- Managers focus on doing things right, whereas, leaders focus on doing the right things o Project managers deal with delivery and implementation, ensuring things are done correctly. o Leaders place a strong emphasis on the team’s vision. Commonalities between leadership and project management: Successful project managers develop skills through knowledge and integrate leadership skills with their current capabilities to effectively complete the project. An article emphasizing the leadership skills of a project management states that “The performance of a project manager and the effectiveness of a leader are both measured in terms of the performance of the team.” (Kumar, 2009) For a project manager, leadership can take the form of negotiating, listening, influencing skills, team building and communicating. All of these skills come together and contributes towards improving team performance.
Therefore, the relationships in various leadership concepts such as styles to conflict management are assessed. According to (Northhouse 2009, p.2), leadership is the way by which a person influences others; in order to meet certain predetermined goals. The author also points out that, leadership involves control of an entity in a cohesive as well as coherent manner. As discussed in (Michel, Kotrba, Mitchelson, Clark and Bate 2011, p.689-725), good leadership facilitates operation stability in organizations, and make interactions among employees hospitable. Further, (Greenhalgh 2001, p.20-35) contends that, leadership represents the current manifestation of management’s commitment to employee performance.
Leaders should have the capability of developing future visions, and to drive the organizational members to want to attain the visions. This paper states my points in which I duly believe, justifies the importance of an outstanding leader in any organization. First and foremost, leaders help to motivate and develop employees in a workplace. There is a popular quote that states, “a manager
It will furthermore identify the commonly known traits of a successful leader and importance of emotional intelligence. Lastly, this essay will explain ‘contingency theory’ in order to gain an understanding on other factors, besides personal traits and characteristics, that can influence the effectiveness within a leader. Defining leadership All organisations require management and management in turn, require a certain level of leadership abilities. The long-term success of an organisation depends on its ability to take advantage of the competences and knowledge of its employees. In an increasingly competitive environment, organisations must motivate its employees and encourage initiative within the organisation.
Northouse (2012) defines leadership as “a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal.”. Leadership is a crucial element in teamwork; some argue a team essentially relies on motivation and guidance from their leader. Managers generally adopt a leadership style and implement it in their work and within their team. Examples of leadership styles are: authoritarian, democratic, laissez faire, transactional and transformational. This essay will discuss authoritarian and democratic leadership, considering the influence and impact they have on a team to evaluate different elements of teamwork and how conflict is managed and resolved within a team.
Leadership is a communication process of a leader and individuals in which the leaders behavior or attitude directs individuals towards any goal effectively. It is widely believed that leadership creates the vital link between organizational effectiveness and people’s performance at an organizational level (Avolio, 1999; McGrath and MacMillan, 2000). The effectiveness of an organization depends upon the leader having an effective leadership style in order to effectively reach the goal of the organization; with it being one of the key driving forces for improving a firm’s performance. Scholars suggest that effective leadership behaviors can facilitate the improvement of performance when organizations face problems (McGrath and MacMillan, 2000). To effectively achieve leadership of individuals and organizational outcomes, four theories can be used; Fiedler’s Contingency Model, Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Model, Vroom & Yetton Participative Leadership Model, and House & Dessler Path-Goal Theory.
Situational theory of Leadership The situational theory of leadership focuses on the projected outcomes and the development of the group. The basic premise of this leadership model is that different situations demand different kinds of leadership. Leadership is composed of both directive and supportive elements, and a leader must evaluate how committed and competent his or her followers are for a given task.(Roberts). A leader will choose the appropriate behaviours given the goals and the development/abilities of the group(Roberts), which can either be: Directive behaviour which focuses on the task at hand and the product, including establishing goals, giving directions, defining roles, evaluation, setting time lines and showing how goals
Leadership is defined as the action of guiding an individual or group of people. Effective leaders shape the behavior and thought process of the individuals around them. As a result, the success of an organization is often impacted by the leadership style and approach of its leaders. Even when engaging with multiple people, impactful leaders maintain their own style of leadership but occasionally change their approach based on the motivational needs of each individual. However, regardless of the style, leadership within an organization is designed to drive the performance of their employees and it is done through proficient communication.
This includes the direction in which it lead by, how it is controlled, and how the culture is exerted through the actions of the company. Leadership in an organisation is extremely influential, and thus, is a key driver to the performance of a company. A leader becomes a pioneer of the way a culture is developed and evidently, creates the values and beliefs of this culture as a reflection of the organisation’s image. A culture is developed through intricate relationships and shared experiences of members, but guided by a leader who enforces these beliefs and values (Schien, 2010). Therefore, a strong culture will improve performance if the values and beliefs of the leader are tied with that of the organisation, thus both facets will be working in sync.
Whether your style is task related or relationship oriented, the task of motivating employees is the most important part of your job. First, let’s identify what most leadership styles are based on. They are based on a person’s views, values, past leadership experiences, learning abilities, and cultural environment. However, in order to achieve the goals of the organization and motivate the employees the leader must remember some key factors in motivating: 7.1 Motivating Approaches Develop approaches to motivate your employees and communicate the task. Employees can see when you are passionate and when your passion comes across in explaining the assignment they will understand the purpose.