Such Stuff As Dreams, By Keith Oatley

1119 Words3 Pages

Reading creates empathetic and emotionally intelligent members of society. Fiction provides the reader with a variety of experiences, often quite different from their own life. University of Toronto psychology professor and author of Such Stuff as Dreams:The Psychology of Fiction, Keith Oatley, comments on the highly immersive nature of a story by observing how readers possess the ability to “become other people and enter their social worlds” as well as “meet others whom we would never meet in our day to day life”; accordingly, to those who enter the life of a particular character, the character often becomes a better-known companion to the reader than some friends in real life. This exercise in stepping into the shoes of another increases …show more content…

This experience allows them to humanize the person and understand the reality of day to day life coping with an impediment. The interviewer can “focus less on individual symptoms and more on fears, struggles, emotions, and successes.” Many students value the opportunity, because it opens their eyes and creates a complex picture of a person rather than a simple, black and white textbook understanding of the illness or disorder (Rouse). Reading increases both intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligence by giving individuals the tools necessary to articulate their own feelings and understand those of others. A novel’s value often lies in that left unsaid, so active reading and thorough reflection, encompassing skills such as making inferences and reading between the lines, remains vital to a complete understanding of the text. A comprehensive reading of the classics requires the readers to draw individual conclusions, take away their own moralities and lessons, and connect the book to other works of literature, real world events, and the thoughts buried deep inside themselves. Through this intensive process, readers emerge with a tool kit of critical thinking skills and an increased empathetic capacity …show more content…

Philosophy builds a versatile foundation for an array of diverse and constantly evolving possibilities. President of Harvard University, Drew Faust, proposes philosophy supplies students with a toolkit filled with a collection of vital basic thinking skills that carry over across the disciplines to “help [students] get ready for their sixth job, not their first job” (qtd. in Zakaria 79). The general stereotypes of philosophical study portray the discipline as useless, lacking in practical applications, and inferior to a more marketable degree in the sciences; conversely, philosophy opens doors to a variety of professional paths, as students use the degree as a springboard to excel in careers such as politics, law, journalism, counseling, research, and education. Many head directly to postgraduate studies due to an intense love of learning for learning’s sake (Boyd). Angus Brook, associate dean of the School of Philosophy and Theology at Sydney’s University of Notre Dame Australia, hypothesizes the great success of philosophy majors lies in the “foundation in reasoning and logic, critical thinking, analysis, and understanding of abstract topics” (qtd. in Boyd). While many students glean intrinsic rewards from their studies, such as intellectual stimulation or an outlet for their insatiable curiosity and interest in the big

Open Document