Stop And Frisk

1521 Words4 Pages

Stop and Frisk
Introduction
Most African Americans and Hispanics in certain part of the United States have been subject to some form of stop and frisk. Some stop and frisks are racially related and other are legit. For the ones that are not legit it seems that there is a particular ethic group that is the main focus of these stop and frisks, and they tend to be the African Americans. When we are stopped the term used with some LEOs and even non LEOs (regular citizens) is driving while black, especially if they are stopped on the highway (e.g., Lundman and Kaufman 2003 and Weitzer, 2000, Harris, 2002). Within this discussion, we will focus on stop and frisk, the distinction between the stop and the frisk, Terry v. Ohio, one or two examples where a stop and frisk would be justified, the length of time of the detention, could the subject be handcuffed during this stop, and the level of force that could be used to enforce the stop and frisk.
What is stop and frisk?
Most of us know what stop and frisk means, but for argument sake, lets us summarize what it means. Well, it when a LEO has briefly hinder an individual and pat them down, this type of search must only be done to the persons outer apparel when there no “specific articulable facts leading a reasonable police officer to believe a person is armed and dangerous” (“Stop and Frisk, n.d., para. 1). …show more content…

Ohio case clashed with the Fourth Amendment and the protection from harassing intrusive or conduct by LEO when there is no criminal act being committed, and the obligation of an LEO is to ‘investigate suspicious behavior and prevent crime” (Terry v. Ohio, 1968, para. 2). According to the Terry v. Ohio (1968) case had cooperating lawyers by the name of Louis Stokes and Jack G. Day who represented Mr. Terry, and Berkman of the ACLU of Ohio, with Wulf and Levine of the national ACLU, filed an amicus brief urging

Open Document