Statutory Blindness

361 Words1 Page

Primary diagnosis: statutory blindness. Secondary diagnosis: none established. The claimant was an 18-year-old man. Alleged disability: vision issues that cannot be corrected/blindness, and epilepsy. The claimant’s mother stated that he had a seizure disorder; he had “really bad headaches,” body aches, and slept after each episode of convulsions. He had visual issues from birth. He had some difficulty with his personal hygiene and activities of daily living, and needed help organizing his medications. He was unable to handle money; he had difficulty counting change, but was able to see numbers on checkbooks. He wore special eyeglasses to see large print. He reported that he had difficulty walking, climbing, reaching, following …show more content…

The primary diagnosis was statutory blindness. The secondary diagnosis was none established. Per medical records (2015), the claimant had a history of developmental delay, limited vision, and a seizure disorder. He could see, but was unable to focus. He had atrophy of the optic nerve (optic chiasm) and involuntary eye movements (bilateral nystagmus). His mother reported that the seizures were worsening; he had “a cluster of 3 seizures this week.” Per ophthalmological consultative examination (CE) (10/19/2015), the claimant’s medical history and diagnoses were as above. He appeared “somewhat depressed from his condition.” His visual acuity bilaterally was 20/200 (normal vision is 20/20). He was at a high risk for glaucoma. The claimant met disability listing 2.02 (Loss of central visual acuity). 20/20 vision is a term used to express normal visual acuity (the clarity or sharpness of vision) measured at a distance of 20 feet. If you have 20/20 vision, you can see clearly at 20 feet what should normally be seen at that distance. If you have 20/100 vision, it means that you must be as close as 20 feet to see what a person with normal vision can see at 100

More about Statutory Blindness

Open Document