Stage 5 Evaluation Plan Paper

1223 Words3 Pages

Evaluation Plan
The evaluation plan should fit nicely into the model outlined above by Kent-Walsh and McNaughton (2005). The pretest in Stage 1 should provide the baseline for the targeted strategy. As referenced in a study by Light et al. (1992), this baseline should be based upon behaviors that are occurring within a natural environment. Then in Stage 7, the posttest should provide the post-intervention probe. Finally, the generalization occurring in Stage 8 provides follow-up assessments that can gauge the overall effectiveness of the intervention. The reason for this evaluation process is tri-fold. The first component is to see what needs have and have not been met (Beukelman, Mirenda, & Ball, 2013). Secondly, it is to determine the effectiveness …show more content…

For this evaluation process, the clinicians observed the timing occurring in between turn-taking and recorded the amount of time and then found the average. If there were any discrepancies between the recorded length of pauses between the different clinicians, the AAC team should agree upon a consensus before continuing with the gathering of data. It is also important to define the utterances that are being separated by pauses worth recording. For a study by Senner and Baud (2016), they defined utterances as “sentence or shorter units of language that were separated from other utterances by a pause” (p. 5). Thus, the clinicians would record the sessions and would then re-listen to them and record the length of the delay in seconds between turns (See Appendix A). The sessions could vary on the amount of turns that are taken, but that should not affect the averages of the pauses between turns. Thus, the recorded average of seconds should show an increase from the original baseline of the pretest to the posttest and any other follow-ups of the generalization phase. According to the results, there appears to be a clear improvement from the pretest stage to the posttest stage and to the generalization stage as well (See Appendix …show more content…

Kazdin (1977) defines social validation as referring to “assessing the social acceptability of intervention programs” (p. 430). While a somewhat broad definition, it does assist the AAC team in framing this portion of the evaluation. There are many components of social validation that need to be measured. Beukelman and Mirenda (2013) consider the consumer satisfaction, an aspect of social validation, as a key portion of the outcome data. Another aspect is the quality of life. If the individual has mastered skills but cannot apply them into his daily life, then the intervention has been drastically limited. The generalization of these skills should be outside of the classroom or the clinic

Open Document