St. Clare's Rule Of Assisi

1624 Words4 Pages

Upon a first read of these two monastic codes of conduct, there doesn’t appear to be any very big differences. After all, Clare had modeled her life and monastic practice following the footsteps of Francis. She like him had been born into wealth, but never showed keen interest in the luxuries afforded by her family. When she had occasion to hear Francis of Assisi preach in the church of San Giorgio in Assisi, she was deeply inspired to take up a life solely dedicated to God. Clare eventually fled her parents and an impending marriage, and was received by Francis who witnessed her vows on March 20, 1212. (St. Clare of Assisi. Catholic Encyclopedia 1) The points of intersection between their two respective Rules will be examined in regards …show more content…

Section 1 in both are titled: In the name of the Lord begins the form of life of the Poor Sisters, and; In the name of the Lord, the life of the lesser brothers begins. The Francis Rule then states: “The Rule and life of the lesser brothers is this: To observe the holy gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, living in obedience without anything of our own, and in chastity” (Rule of St. Francis of Assisi, Ofm.Org 1). The Rule of Clare states: “The form of life of the Order of the Poor Sisters which the Blessed Francis established is this: to observe the holy Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ by living in obedience without anything of one’s own and in chastity” (Oden 129). It is clear that the essence of both Rules is stated up front. The backbone of each is an obedience to the Gospel of Jesus and a conviction in poverty and chastity. The hierarchy of obedience is unwaveringly directed towards the head of each monastery and Abbey, their successors, the Holy Pope and the Roman Church. Interestingly, the key difference is that Clare also swears obedience to Francis and his successors. The question of land and poverty is a provocative one. Both orders required that a prospective mendicant sell all that they own before joining. Both assert that no property or possessions can be owned apart from clothing, but Clare leaves out the specific Franciscan decree that monks shall accept no

Open Document