Special Education Executive Summary

1019 Words3 Pages

In June 2014, the Office of Special Education announced changes in the monitoring and enforcement of special education for students with disabilities. Prior to this, OSEP focused on compliance driven requirements of the law in the monitoring and enforcing of special education regulations. Balancing between compliance and improved results for children and youth with disabilities and their families is the new focus. The basis of this decision was on concern with the current achievement rates and graduation rates for students with disabilities. Secretary Arne Duncan said in a press release regarding results driven accountability, “We have to expect the very best from our students- and tell the truth about student performance- so that we can …show more content…

Anderson (2006) defined command as involving hierarchic relationships among superordinate and subordinates. In order to improve outcomes for students with disabilities, Secretary Duncan used this type of decision making to hold states more accountable for educating students with disabilities largely because educational outcomes for students with disabilities have not improved as expected. However, members of Congress expressed concern regarding secretary Duncan’s actions. Duncan, a member of the executive branch unilaterally made changes to federal regulations and bypassed the legislative process for amending federal laws. Senator Hatch in collaboration with other senators sent a detailed correspondence to secretary Duncan. In this letter, the senators requested revoking the results driven accountability system in monitoring special education . In an attempt to improve outcomes for students with disabilities, OSEP placed new requirements on states focusing on results and not simply compliance with …show more content…

Need to cite this

To meet the requirements set on June 24, 2014 by the United States Department of Education, the VDOE revised its monitoring of special education into a system of “results-driven accountability (RDA) that provides greater supports to local education agencies in improving results for children and youth with disabilities, and their families. Until now, the emphasis for monitoring was on procedural compliance of special education regulations and not on the performance outcomes of students with disabilities.

Beginning with the 2014-15 school year, the VDOE no longer conduct the monitoring visits based on a cyclical process. The verification and monitoring visits used to ensure submitted data from each school division is accurate will continue. However, the weeklong federal review process from years past has changed because of the shift to a results driven accountability system. The revised monitoring system will utilize the federal review and technical assistance upon targeted need as determined by data analysis of the state’s Special Education Annual Performance Report

Open Document