Response to Intervention
Response to Intervention (RtI) is a framework based off the problem solving method that integrates assessment, and targeted instruction, within a multi-tiered intervention system. Implementation of RtI in schools is crucial to identify which students need additional intervention that will help increase their literacy skills, and prevent them from falling behind. RtI is based off multi-leveled tiers that are each categorized by the intensity of the intervention that is being used. The RtI framework is also used as a valued tool in monitoring and improving student behavior in the classroom through a model known as Positive Behavioral Intervention Support (PBIS).
RtI was designed to provide early intervention to students that are experiencing difficulties in developing literacy skills. Throughout RtI, assessment data is collected to monitor student progress, and is used to determine if the intervention should be continued or modified (Smetana 2010). A common consensus is that the RtI framework consists of three tiers: Tier I, Tier II, and Tier III. In Tier I, primary interventions are used that differentiate instruction, routines, and accommodations to the students that need little to no interventions. The students in this tier are often times classified with the color green.
In Tier II, secondary interventions are used to help the students that are not making adequate progress towards developing appropriate literacy skills, despite the Tier I interventions (Smetana 2010). These students are classified with the color yellow, and are given more intense interventions that are targeted to their need. These interventions help determine if the student can eventually go back down to green, or if they...
... middle of paper ...
...IS are great models, and I would love the opportunity to use some day in my classroom.
Sandomierski, T., Kincaid, D., & Algozzine, B. (2007, June). Response to intervention and positive behavior support: Brothers from different mothers or sisters with different misters?. Retrieved from http://www.pbis.org/pbis_newsletter/volume_4/issue2.aspx
Shapiro, E.S. (2011). Saving the future: Response to intervention may be on solution that prevents a child’s ailing academic health. Theory to Practice: An Inquisitive Review of Contemporary Education & Health, 3, 14-19.
Smetana, L. (2010). A view from the middle tier: Looking closely at Tier II intervention. The California Reader, 43(4), 15-24.
Wedl, R. J. (2005). An alternative to traditional eligibility criteria for students with disabilities. In Response to Intervention (pp. 1-19). Education Evolving.
These DIBELS screening assessments were developed to help educators identify struggling, at-risk readers, so that appropriate types and levels of support can be implemented within the school system. They were designed to support efforts at the primary grade levels (K-6th) to prevent reading struggles as the learn progress through the school system. Furthermore, this test was to aid in the elimination in remediation lessons inside of the classroom.
In the case study entitled, How Far Should We Go, a fifth grader named Brian currently attends Willow Brook Elementary and transferred from a different district two years ago. In the previous school district, Brian received his instructional needs with special education services in a self-contained classroom after his diagnosis of language learning delays. Yet, when enrolled at Willow Brook, the decision for Brian’s placement resolved a continuous progress classroom as the appropriate educational environment. However, the author recommends further testing to determine the applicable instructional setting to support Brian’s progress with his reading difficulties.
The setup of RTI’s are; to give teachers effective instruction, monitor progress, if child is not responding get more instruction, monitor progress again, and if student is still not responding qualify as special education. School psychologist looked at RTI’s as a problem solving model and labeled the model along with the early intervention program described in 4 steps. Step 1 was compromise the problem and identify, this is when teachers and...
A. Before we used to use DIBLES to identify students but we just recently switched to AIMSWEB. AIMSWEB is a universal screening, progress monitoring and data management system that supports Response to Intervention and tiered instruction. AIMSWEB allows us to look at all the students and see the ones who are most at risk and the ones who are least at risk and provides us with benchmark scores for each child. After we test a student we then put their scores into our computer system and it generates a main score for us, which is very nice because then we do not have to do the math ourselves. Then after we get the students score, we then decided if the student is in either Tier 1, 2, or 3. Before we had five reading specialists in the building so every 30 minutes we would pull out students and test them. With our primary kids we worked on letters and sounds and for our kids who were in grades third through sixth, we would help them prepare for the PSSA’s. As of last May, we do not do targeted assistance and are now a school wide title. We now help all the students in the whole school and are not just targeting the ones with IEPS. All three of our elementary buildings are going to the Multi-Tier Intervention (MTI). Our Intervention
This is a reading intervention classroom of six 3rd grade students ages 9-10. This intervention group focuses on phonics, fluency, and comprehension. The students were placed in this group based on the results of the DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency assessment. Students in this class lack basic decoding skills.
...h retaining the low literacy achieving students because the majority of the students do achieve grade-level standard in 12-20 weeks. The cost of the placement in special education classes is significantly higher than the cost of the 20-week class. Even though not all 100% of the students achieve the desired results, early intervention helps schools find future support services and lower the cost of the individual tutoring. Finally, the Federal IDEA funding requires the children to receive an early intervening service in order to reduce unnecessary testing cost.
This means the students identified through screening as being at-risk for poor learning outcomes. The targeted interventions and frequent monitoring that are characteristic of this tier still take place in the general education classroom or other general education settings within the school. Interventions involve providing a standard, validated instructional program to students in a group typically consisting of no more than five students. The interventions should be delivered by someone who has received extensive training into the intervention program. This could be a person in the position of general education teacher, paraprofessional, reading specialist, etc. Assessments at this level include progress monitoring and
But what happens next when a student is still not “getting it?” How do we best serve students to see improvement and keep them from being classified special education? In this paper I will share how CIM as a RtI method and outlines the implications for literacy instruction.
I chose to focus reading with a first grade student. This student has missed a lot of school in the past and has moved around frequently. On the FAST assessment, this student scored at the bottom of all first graders. Reading is of high importance and an intervention in this area is in high need.
Informal Reading Inventory(IRI) is a system that measures the skill level of individual students’ reading performance. Nina L. Nilsson, an experienced scholar in the field of literacy education published a journal article about IRIs and the importance they serve.
2009) which was outreach to various ethnic backgrounds. This article takes into consideration cultural differences and how that plays a role in parenting. It gives the suggestion of having multi-level Triple P interventions intact so that different problems can be addressed properly. For example, a child with mild behavioral problems should not receive the same intensive treatment as a child with severe behaviors. Sanders (2010) focuses his attention on how it is imperative to understand the parent child context so that when we utilize Triple P we do so in the most effective manner. With that being stated, the article really lacked in its ability to properly report data. It did however,
These theories, methods, assessments along with the evidence of success in reading at home make it clear that it is extremely important we try our hardest to support literacy in every child. All students can learn. It’s just a matter of making materials interesting and relevant to them, challenging them (but not to hard), and supporting them along the way.
King and Lemons identified areas that administration needs to consider in order to implement effective RTI in the district. King and Lemons suggested areas such as; professional development, tools for implement and progress monitoring, and the needs of not only the students but also the educators who engage in RTI. King and Lemons implies that is crucial that educator be aware of the need to pursue training, tools, and a greater understanding for effective RTI.
Since, RTI follows a case-by-case evaluation, decision making based on struggling students’ response to high-quality research-based interventions functions well in my district. I would like to know more on how other schools respond to the different levels of intervention with their students. How long do schools wait until they move students from one level to the next? Who makes up the team of experts for their children? Also, do teams involve parents with regard to their child’s different tier levels or only if students qualify for an IEP? Currently, we do not make specific phone calls to tell parents how or why their child is moving from one group to the next. That is left for the classroom teacher to do if they so
It is enlightening to know the Specific Learning Disability category isn’t so specific. There are many disabilities within this category that are labeled as a Specific Learning Disability. Furthermore, the law doesn’t provide guidance on how Response to Intervention, RTI, is supposed to be conducted and managed also, the data is being used to diagnose children instead of the data from comprehensive testing. Response to Intervention is a great tool for locating those children who are at risk and then proceeding with a referral for testing, but not the only data for diagnosis (Sattler, 2014).