Socrates And The Sophists Essay

798 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Contrast between the sophists and Socrates is detailed

Socrates is known as a great Greek philosopher. The Sophists happen to be Socrates contemporary philosophers. Socrates as a philosopher is always seen distinguishing himself from the Sophists. As a general definition, a philosopher is a lover of wisdom and a sophist is the person who is wise himself. Philosophy is the pursuit of true knowledge and sophistry is the art of rhetorically manipulating the known facts. Here starts the distinctive point between Socrates and the Sophists. But this distinction is very complicated and confusing to find out. Although Socrates and the Sophists seem to have set the similar goals, the difference lies in the way and purpose of approaching those goals.
Both the Sophists and Socrates belong to the same line of profession which is teaching but the main difference is that the Sophists charge a good fee for the learning they provide. The sophists have a vanity that they turn people wiser. But Socrates does not take money for his efforts. He never claims to distribute wisdom among people. He is a travelling preacher of truth while the sophists are professionals who are paid by aristocratic young men in particular for their teaching efforts (Chrome)
Bothe Socrates and the sophists surely belong to Greece but we see that the sophists are prone to travel from city to city to practice their philosophy and to increase their followers but this is not the case with Socrates because he is never found going from one city to another to do his teaching. He seems to be very loyal to Athens while the sophists do not stick just to Athens. It shows that the pursuit of the philosophical goals of the sophists and Socrates has different directions.
A philosopher has to have belief in some ideals. In this regard,...

... middle of paper ...

...wise people who already know everything. Socrates has never pretended to know the truth, he just believes in seeking the ultimate truth. For the sophists, knowledge is power, and those who know a lot must be the rulers. This fact is another main cause of distinction between Socrates and the sophists.
It is true that both Socrates and the sophists belong to the similar field and set a more or less a prominent and similar goal which is knowledge and truth, but their ways to reach their destinations are not similar. The basic purposes behind attaining knowledge are very much different from each other. The fact of the matter is that we cannot ignore or give less importance either to Socrates or the sophists because Socrates is the legend of the world of philosophy and we owe a lot to the sophists for their rhetoric art of persuasion which is still practiced till today.

Show More
Related

  • Who Is Pericles Wise

    813 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Athens, there were two wise men named Socrates and Pericles. In the short story "Plato's Apology", Socrates is on trial, and is speaking before his peers so that he may be judged. In "Pericles's Funeral Oration", Pericles himself is giving a speech at a funeral on behalf of the fallen soldiers of Athens. In both speeches, Socrates and Pericles believe it will be hard to talk about the subject because the people listening might not believe what they say to be the truth or the whole truth. Both men were considered wise, but Socrates believed men were not virtuos, and Pericles believed that man does strive to become virtous. I believe that Socrates's arguments are a rebuttal to Pericles's Funeral Oration, and although they are both wise, only Socrates has true wisdom.

    Read More

  • The Apology: A Philosophical Way Of Life

    1001 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Pierre Hadot, “Thus philosophy was a way of life, both in its exercise and effort to achieve wisdom, and its goal, wisdom itself. For real wisdom does not merely cause us to know: it makes us “be” in a different way” ( Pierre 265) This explanation of a philosophical way of life is in all ways the definition of Socrates’ life. Socrates made his way through his entire life living in this way, seeking out wisdom, seeking out answers and never once got in trouble with the court until the age of seventy years old. He believed that by telling people about ignorance and wisdom, that he was only doing so for the good of the people. Socrates even goes as far as saying, “I am that Gadfly which God has attached to the state, and all day long and in all places am always fastening upon you, arousing and persuading and reproaching you”(Plato 9). Socrates believes that he was sent from God to show people a different way of life, a life of questioning and reason to which he should teach to all people. When asked if he was ashamed of a course of life of which would likely bring him to an untimely end Socrates says, “you are mistaken: a man who is good for anything ought not to calculate the chance of living or dying; he ought only to consider whether in doing anything he is doing right or wrong” (Plato 7).

    Read More

  • The Apology and Crito

    345 Words  | 1 Pages

    Socrates was wise men, who question everything, he was found to be the wise man in Athens by the oracle. Although he was consider of being the wises man alive in those days, Socrates never consider himself wise, therefore he question everything in order to learned more. Socrates lived a poor life, he used to go to the markets and preach in Athens he never harm anyone, or disobey any of the laws in Athens, yet he was found guilty of all charges and sentence to die.

    Read More

  • Socrates Quote Analysis

    439 Words  | 1 Pages

    Socrates was philosophizing in order to make people recognize this. Maybe they did not want to be challenged, but Socrates persisted and this persistence caused him to become beloved to some, yet hated by others. His contribution to Athens was to evoke thought, and although he did this well, it would become his poison, quite literally. Regardless, the story of the Euthyphro is one of the classic examples of how Socrates was making his name and awakening people’s minds to the thoughts that they did not think to have. Euthyphro’s conversation with Socrates was only one of many and I believe it is safe to say that the frustration on the subject’s behalf was not an isolated

    Read More

  • Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates

    1245 Words  | 3 Pages

    I totally agree that Socrates found it important to research about life’s morality and not just think the same way others do. That is a way of proving the knowledge of men. Ones sitting quiet in the corner usually have more knowledge than others that talk so much about what they know. Many men with a high position in life do not always have the most knowledge.

    Read More

  • Deciphering Socrates: A Study Through Plato’s Lens

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gregory Vlastos commented in his book Socrates: The Ironist and Moral Philosopher, “Such is his strangeness that you will search and search among those living now and among men of the past, and never come close to what he is himself and to the things he says.” (Vlastos). Gregory makes an important point; although studying Plato gives us a glimpse of Socrates, it only gives a glimpse of him through Plato’s eyes. We can study this text and others and never understand exactly who this man is. Even if we had writings of Socrates’s own hands it would be difficult to understand this complicated man. On the other hand the writings we do have, including the

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Euthyphro And Socrates

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “The Apology” and “Euthyphro”, Plato creates a picture of the principles Socrates has on philosophy and wisdom. Since there are know direct pieces of literature written by Socrates, all of the information about him are composed by other Philosophers who encountered him. So when I refer to Socrates, it means the character depicted by Plato. I will argue that some important characteristics of philosophy and being a philosopher is evident by comparing Socrates with Euthyphro because of how he sees knowledge is obtained combined with the impact with which religion has on society.

    Read More

  • Philosophy Of Socrates

    975 Words  | 2 Pages

    His teachings toward to people were that "virtue is knowledge", that a good man should care for his soul by making himself as wise as possible. To become wise was to achieve knowledge. According to Socrates, virtue is same as knowledge and the wrongdoing is ignorance and it is always involuntary. Socrates arguments about the wrongdoing being involuntary, I think he means that when people do evil things, it is to gain goods for himself in use of evil. Socrates only questions himself for what people believed to be the truth where he created discussion called the Socratic Method. It could be classified as truth only if something passed that method, otherwise, it's not the truth. He would ask many questions and whenever he receives answers, he would ask the question again according to the answer and if the person's being asked doesn't give a good answer to the question, he was to admit he didn't know the answer to the very first question. Socrates didn't know answers to many questions but he kept on questioning over and over again until he found logical answers within the questions being discussed. Socrates knew that people didn't know the answers so he decided to make it open to discussion for everyone. He believed that actual knowledge came from the whole as

    Read More

  • Socrates was a Wise and Harmless Man

    1122 Words  | 3 Pages

    Socrates was a traveling teacher and talked and challenged everyone he met. Socrates taught the art of persuasive speaking. He did not charge people money like most of the other Sophists did, but he did have similar beliefs as the Sophists. Sophists thought that our minds are cut off from reality and that we are stuck in our own opinions of what the world was like. Socrates believed that reason or nature could not tell us why the world is the way it appears. The Sophists' point of view is best summed up as this: we can never step out of the way things appear.

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Protagoras And Socrates

    806 Words  | 2 Pages

    You are in an argument with your friend, would you rather be the one who is winning or the one who actually takes something away from the argument? This was the case for Protagoras and Socrates throughout the text Protagoras. Protagoras represented sophists, while Socrates represented philosophers. A sophist is a teacher of virtue, they twist what is being said to make it positive. They make others into skillful speakers. Philosophers are those who want to know what is true and want to be wise. Both had different points within the argument which is what made them different. While Protagoras wants to win the argument, Socrates wants to learn something from it, that is what exactly virtue is. There is a clear difference between philosophers and sophists, and I think it is better to be a philosophist.

    Read More

  • Philosophy Of Education: Socrates, Plato, And Aristotle

    350 Words  | 1 Pages

    Socrates, which is synonymous with wisdom and the philosophical life, was a teacher without a school. His goal was to help others find the truths that lie within their own minds. He helped his students reach deeper, clearer ideas by questioning, disproving, and testing the thoughts of his pupils. His teachings offended many of the powerful people of his time. They believed he was corrupting the youth in Athens. Since he believed and taught in this way, he was executed.

    Read More

  • The Teachings of the Sophists

    1487 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... the sophists are significant. They educated many Athenians, providing the country with greater numbers of intelligent, literate persuaders. They impacted the ways that laws were brought about because they were some of the leading thinkers of the time. The sophists also questioned many of the traditionally accepted schools of thought, which planted the seed that eventually grew into the skeptic movement. The skeptics were a group of people who examined the limitations of human knowledge.

    Read More

  • Socrates and the Sophists

    675 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates was a philosopher who set out to prove, to the gods, that he wasn't the wisest man. Since he could not afford a "good" Sophist teacher, surely a student of one had to be smarter than he. He decides to converse with the youth of Athens, but concludes that he actually is wiser than everyone he speaks with. He then realizes that their lack of intelligence is the fault of their teachers. Socrates understands that the practice of "sophism" leads to a lack of self-knowledge and moral values. Socrates was later accused of corrupting the youth of Athens and put on trial. In The Apology of Socrates he sta...

    Read More

  • History Of Philosophy

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates was among the first philosophers who wasn't a sophist, meaning that he never felt that he was

    Read More

  • Socrates' Pursuit of Wisdom

    1155 Words  | 3 Pages

    Philosophy can be defined as the pursuit of wisdom or the love of knowledge. Socrates, as one of the most well-known of the early philosophers, epitomizes the idea of a pursuer of wisdom as he travels about Athens searching for the true meaning of the word. Throughout Plato’s early writings, he and Socrates search for meanings of previously undefined concepts, such as truth, wisdom, and beauty. As Socrates is often used as a mouthpiece for Plato’s ideas about the world, one cannot be sure that they had the same agenda, but it seems as though they would both agree that dialogue was the best way to go about obtaining the definitions they sought. If two people begin on common ground in a conversation, as Socrates often tries to do, they are far more likely to be able to civilly come to a conclusion about a particular topic, or at least further their original concept.

    Read More

More about Socrates And The Sophists Essay

Open Document