Sin, Death and Life, and Dominion in Romans 6:1-14

1660 Words4 Pages

“What then are we to say?” entreats Paul in Romans 6:1. “Should we continue in sin in order that grace may abound?” Paul answers his own query in the section that follows, leading up to the conclusions that Christians are “under grace” (v. 14). For Paul the transition of the person from sin to grace relates to the person’s identity and belonging. Sin, in Romans 6:1-14, means less a person’s actions specifically and more the claims to which a person belongs. With sin comes death and dominion that, apart from Christ, define who persons are in themselves and in their allegiances. Christ, however, redefines the person’s status—replacing the person’s identity of death with that of new life and releasing the person from the dominion of sin. In Romans 6:1-14, Paul rejects continuing in sin on the grounds that doing so denies the proper identity and belonging that Christians have in Christ’s death and life. Moreover, Paul asserts that belonging to Christ’s life means rejecting identity with sin’s dominion. Before assessing Paul’s ground for rejecting continuation in sin, we must ask what Paul means by sin. For Paul in Romans 6:1-14, sin refers not to wrongful human actions per se but rather to a power to which Christians should not belong. The word Paul uses in this passage for sin is the noun ἁμαρτία. While the word may refer to “a departure from either human or divine standards of uprightness,” it may also mean “a state of being sinful” or “a destructive evil power” that Paul renders “in almost personal terms…as a ruling power that invades the world.” Sin appears exclusively as a noun in Romans 6:1-14—a fact that further hints toward Paul’s primary concern here with sin as a state of being or power. Romans 6:1-14 support... ... middle of paper ... ...righteousness in parallel with that of the Christian believer (4:3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23, 24). NRSV translates it as “reckon.” The effect is similar in Romans 4 and in this verse: Abraham’s righteousness as well as the Christian’s relates to externally reckoned belonging rather than inherent identity. Within Romans 6:1-14, the metaphor is a largely negative one—dominion is bad, freedom is good—though in Romans 7 Paul will turn it to positive ends, paralleling the bond of marriage (7:1-3) to the status of being “slaves…in the new life of the Spirit” (7:6). The term translated as “freed” is δεδικαίωται or “have been rendered righteous,” a concept to which verse 13 returns. The term in question for “dominion” is the same as that in verse 14 (discussed in footnote 4) and carries the same implications of belonging under lordship. Danker (2000)

More about Sin, Death and Life, and Dominion in Romans 6:1-14

Open Document