Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why conscription should be banned essay
Good points of conscription
Cons of conscription
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why conscription should be banned essay
The U.S. Military - Should Everyone Serve? The debate over whether military service should be a requirement or not has been raging on for many years. For one, those on the requirement side states “It is your country and your freedoms, so why would you not fight for those rights?” On the other hand, the opposition states “We are all different, and military service isn’t in the best interest of some people.” Although both sides have a decent point, the ladder option seems like the best choice. The main points for why this is are because it is irrational to send a person out to war who is not fit to/does not want to, it will render the military inefficient, and the system would be too difficult to implement (due to the numerous number of dissents …show more content…
They could send out those who don’t want to serve, but rather aid in other jobs, such as curing diseases, engineering the technology of the future, or even furthering war efforts from the labs. According to the article “Serving is not for Everyone” by Jacey Eckhart at Military.com, “...the economic theory called comparative advantage says that it is not very efficient to take on every task you are capable of doing. Instead, you are supposed to specialize in the tasks you are relatively better at compared to other tasks.” What this means is that you can attempt to do everything that you are possibly capable of doing, however it creates inefficiency. The ideal way to carry out tasks is to choose what you are best at and get better at it. Of course, as everyone has different tasks, goals, and specialties, combat may not be one of them. This makes the idea a waste of time for those who do not need the training and have differing paths other than the one paved by the concept of requiring military service. On the other hand, the other side claims that freedoms are a privilege, not a right and that we need to fight for the privileges and opportunities presented to us. This is certainly not true, as all the people in this country contribute for the privileges given in their own unique ways, and do not have to involve military …show more content…
Some are not cut out for the strict orders, the positions in the military, or the difficult and harsh training involved for each position. The quantity of soldiers available may increase, but the quality certainly will decrease. You are only as strong as your weakest link, so the fact that it can cost an unnecessary life or even a war in times of crisis makes it a bad idea. According to “10 Meaningful Pros and Cons of Mandatory Military Service” on connectusfund.org, it states that mandatory military service “...could lead to high casualty rate among soldiers drafted under compulsory military service.” This makes the major risk that comes along with mandatory military service not worth the minimal reward. Of course, there is always the point that it increases availability of soldiers. However, quality does not always equate to quality, and it could actually hold the entire team down due to the extra unnecessary
"A young man who does not have what it takes to perform military service is not likely to have what it takes to make a living." When joining the military you must perform your best to protect our country. Tons of men and women around the world fight for the country and make a career out of it. There are three major branches and many different jobs to go with each one. Each have many specific tasks. (Robbie Hughes Interview)
“First, conscription doesn’t save much cash. It costs money to manage and enforce a draft- history demonstrates that not every inductee would go quietly. Conscripts serve shorter terms and reenlist less frequently, increasing turnover, which is expensive. And unless the government instituted a Czarist lifetime draft, everyone beyond the first ranks would continue to expect to be paid” (Forbes). Even though “The military not only provides training in a range of specialties; it also offers educational benefits for veterans-- including many from underprivileged back grounds-- that might not be available under a mandatory
Over forty years has passed since the United States inducted the last draftee through the Selective Service System. The Selective Service System is an independent agency of the United States, which gives the President the right or power to conscript men for military service. There have been different Acts passed by congress since 1917 that require men of various ages to register for service. Although, the name of each Act and the age requirements of the registries changed, the Acts were all similar in nature. They all gave the President the right to call men to war when he deemed necessary. In January 1973, Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird announced the creation of the all-volunteer service, retracting the need for the draft (GAO.gov). Under current law, all men between the ages of 18-25 must register within 30 days of their 18th birthday, however this information is used mostly for recruitment purposes and in case of any future crisis. There has been much controversy over this matter since the Vietnam War, when people started to realize the draft was unfair due to loopholes and draft exemptions making the draft unfair for working men. At one point in time the military draft may have been necessary, but today’s all-volunteer military has eliminated the need for a draft.
The protection of our country is not overlooked for recruits; they are awarded many personal benefits as well. Tuition assistance, job training, and many benefits that help prepare recruits for occupations while enlisted. Not only are students getting great benefits, but they are also in a small group of professional workers. High School students should be allowed to join the military, because it is a way to pay for college expenses. College is expensive.
People who support the military draft will say that it is the obligation of every citizen of the United States, and every other person residing in the United States, who is between the ages of 18 and 42, to perform a period of national service. Aren?t there many other ways--less deadly ways--to contribute to the country?s well being? Should we, as citizens, be allowed to evade this ultimate obligation by turning it over to the poorer members of society, those who can't find good-paying jobs or training except in the military? In "A War for Us, Fought by Them," William Broyles, a Vietnam war veteran and the father of a young man who is a soldier in the Marines, argues that the military draft should be brought back, and this time it should be done right: everybody should be drafted, not just ?the profoundly patriotic or the economically needy" (Broyles 695).
Ever since the first war involving America started, there have been countless discussions on who should fight for our country. There are talks of age, gender, and if the service should be voluntary or not. In America, serving is voluntary, although, in other countries, it is not. The service should stay voluntary in America because if not, it would go against freedom and it would be a source of newfound problems within our country. Also, if youth took off two years of their lives to serve, they would not gain experience to work in the fields that need more work force.
There is a Time and a place for everything, for instance there were times when a militarized force wasn’t nearly large enough for an impending war as necessary to stand even that of a fighting chance towards victory. Our nation’s solution to this problem was creating the military draft, which most recently was used during the Vietnam War. The military draft, or Selective Service System, is Conscription, or in other words “forced labor demanded by some established authority” (Worddiq). “From 1948 until 1973, during both peacetime and periods of conflict, men were drafted to fill vacancies in the armed forces which could not be filled through voluntary means.” (Landscaper) 2/3 of the American troops entered in that war were volunteers, while the other third were all draftees by lottery by birth. (Roush) Some might say "hey that’s only one third of our military, that’s not too many draftees." The only problems with that statement would be that the war itself didn't move towards our favor even with the draft. The draftees went through a rushed training session and entered a battlefield with nearly no experience what-so-ever, on or off the battlefield.
...itary conscription in the name of freedom is an illegitimate, criminal organization. A government that is willing to enslave people cannot be trusted to protect your liberty. A government that forces people to fight for its goals, its protection, and its benefit has created a morally perverse situation where there is no free society left to defend” (Boldin). Another thing we must look at is without an overflow of troops; “unpopular wars are very difficult to fight. The ability to use conscription actually encourages politicians to wage even more wars;the massive resources are a temptation that is hard for the war-lover to resist. When the draft was finally undermined in the 1970′s, for example, the Vietnam War ended” (Boldin).
Conscription, also known as drafting, is a practice that requires mandatory enlisting into any of the branches of the armed forces. This practice has been adopted by the United States at the very least two times before and from what I can remember during World War II and the Civil War conscription was being practiced. Nowadays conscription is not practiced in the United States because there isn’t a need for it. Now, if you want to join the army you can do so by volunteering. However, there are people who believe conscription should be brought back. Some people believe that the drafting of younger people might help these young people develop useful skills and cultivate a sense of unity and national pride. Although all of these are valid reasons,
Why put people together who do not want to be there? If you have a group project that consist of five unwilling people and another five who volunteer to do it, which is going to do a better job on the project? The people who want to do it. Forced People cannot perform a task to the highest level that is achievable. If the government reinstates the draft, and there are 200 soldiers and half of them are not willing can rebel against the others; more of a conflict starts. A better army consists of more willing and capable volunteers. They all share the same army values because they all share the same ideas, Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage, everything a soldier should live by. (Duty, serve and protect the United States of America by all means). Selfless Service, put a person on the line for the protection of others. Most important; unwilling soldiers would not want to do something would want to put them in that situation. As well if they only deploy recruits they need to score a certain grade on the ASVAB, Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. A test to see exactly what type of job people qualify for, or their MOS, Military Occupation Specialty, better score gets a better job. “Additionally, Brighter Soldiers could handle the technical materials in the advanced individual training courses, which enabled the Army to upgrade its entry-level training” (Oi
Teaching young men how to survive in horrible conditions while America is at peace is a necessity in order to successfully overwhelm and capture a country. If America stays the way it is now and another country such as Russia tries to invade the US, there won’t be enough experienced soldiers and most American citizens wouldn’t even know what to do. That’s why America needs to reinforce conscription in order to be prepared for these worst case scenarios. This also would boost the economy by creating more job opportunities, because people would work and invest in the private sector of the armed forces. Entrepreneurs would heavily focus on the arms market as well as supplementary training camps. As everyone knows a nation can have a strong and large army available, but if your economy is too fragile and can collapse easily then the soldiers could wave the white flag right ahead just like what basically happened to Germany in the Second World War.
Going into the military isn’t all bad because you can learn all the stuff that American soldiers go through to protect America. We could learn not to take what they do lightly or for granted. Being in the military could be helpful if another country ever decided to try to invade America. No other country would want to invade a country where every man or woman that is there is trained for almost any situation. Not that many people would worry about break-ins or someone mugging them in an alley if everyone had discipline. There's no reason as to why able men and woman shouldn't be obliged to serve their country in times of warfare crisis and/or be prepared for hypothetical wartime. Not only that, but it provides a great amount of benefits, such as: physical conditioning, mental toughening and a chance to help promote equality between young men and women. There are so many immature, feeble-minded, snobbish people in the US nowadays who need to be taught a lesson or two
Military is an establishment of a country and nation. There are a few different motivation behind why one may join the Military. Recently, Ive asked a few secondary school understudies for what good reason they anticipate inlisting in the military. Majority of their responses were cash for school , training and traveling. Those are suitable reasons yet many are undecided wheather to join the military after college or before college. With All things considered , it is by all means more valuable and beneficial to join the military before school instead of joining after school. One key defense would be that joining the military before school will help pay for ones
Most people have, at one point or another, considered what they were going to do with their lives. Whether a person would like to become an activist, an artisan or a business professional, the military has something for everyone. Finding a path in life is often filled with uncertainty and procrastination. The United States military is a path in itself, should one wish to retire from it; however, should a person wish to make their own path, there are benefits for that as well that can remove all doubt and curb procrastination. Due to these many benefits, I believe that it should be mandatory for all adults to enlist for a minimum of twenty-four months.
Mandatory military service is a course to make a fit and capable citizen. First of all, military service can help one's character . More specifically it gives good tools so that people can work well in a team, be more organized in everyday event and good discipline. Secondly, it can offer education to people in need. Furthermore it will help people in bad neighbourhoods or is living trough a thought time and give those without the means to be in a home and have a job. Thirdly but not least mandatory military service could be looked at as a dept owed to one's country, loved ones who are protected if ever needed and most important to our right to democracy.