Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Political views on same sex marriages in the u.s
ADVANTAGE OF same-sex marriage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Political views on same sex marriages in the u.s
Same-sex marriage has marital advantages. There are in excess of one thousand elected laws in which marriage status is a component. These laws present rights, assurances, and profits to wedded couples – from Social Security survivor profits to elected tax breaks to elected representative health and retirement profits. One example of the Social Security benefits wedded homosexuals can have is the lump-sum death benefit where a surviving spouse gets $255 from the federal government to help pay for funeral arrangements. In addition to the Social Security benefits, married gay and lesbian couples also take the upper hand of federal tax benefits like creating a family partnership and life estate trusts. One example is the Home Tax "Portability" where married couples can consolidate their particular domain charge absolutions. This implies that the second life partner die can surrender property worth over to $10 million free from elected bequest charge. Unmarried couples do not get the "compactness," with the goal that the second accomplice seeing someone burn out can leave just $5 million charge free. These benefits provide reasons why couples of the same sex is more likely to share equal inputs from everyday tasks as ordinary as household chores to tasks more complicated like raising a child.
Same-sex marriage has health benefits. Recognized homosexual couples are less prone to drug and alcohol abuse, mood disorders, and generalized anxiety disorders (Levine 9). 12 months after the legalization of same-sex marriages in Massachusetts, a psychologist at Colombia University found out that “there was a 13% reduction in health care visits and a 14% reduction in health care costs among gay and bisexual persons. A look at the diagnostic code...
... middle of paper ...
...t. 2013. http://go.galegroup.com.
Madrid, Jessica, and Stephen Rice. "Examining Cynicism in Regards to Reasons for Gay Marriage." Review of European Studies 5.1 (2013): 45-51. Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Oct. 2013. http://web.ebscohost.com.
Reno, R.R. "The future of marriage." First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life 229 (2013): 3+. Academic OneFile. Web. 18 Oct. 2013. http://go.galegroup.com.
Seastrand, Paul J. "According to the Gospel." Currents in Theology and Mission 39.5 (2012): 352+. Academic OneFile. Web. 23 Oct. 2013. http://go.galegroup.com.
Wight, Richard G., Allen J. LeBlanc, and M. V. Lee Badgett. "Same-Sex Legal Marriage and Psychological Well-Being: Findings from the California Health Interview Survey." American Journal of Public Health 103.2 (2013): 339-346. Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Oct. 2013. http://web.ebscohost.com.
Throughout the recent history of America, gay marriage has always been an issue. With the different views and morals everyone has on the subject, it makes it hard for individual states to determine what side they should be on. In 1983 a Harvard Law School student, Evan Wolfson, wrote a thesis stating the rule of marriage equality. Justices concluded that gay couples were entitled to the legal benefits of civil marriage; and most crucially in the Supreme Judicial Court in Massachusetts, whose favorable ruling, in a suit by lawyer Mary Bonauto and the Boston-based Gay and Lesbian Advocated and Defenders, led to the nation’s first bona fide same-sex marriages…” (“Gay Marriage turns 10 and Credit Should Be Spread around- The Boston Globe). On May 17, 2004 Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriages. In June of 2013, California legalized gay marriages, which helped their large LGBT (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered) community. (“History and Timeline of the Freedom…”). When this finally happened, it was seen as a great achievement by Karmala Harris, a California Attorney. “This is a profound day in our country, and its just the right thing: ‘Justice is finally being served’” (“Court Gives OK for California Gay Marriages”).
Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 19(1), 69-84. Heim, D. (1996). The 'Standard'. Phil Jackson, Seeker in Sneakers. Christian Century, 133(20), 654-656.
History has showed us that marriage helped stabilize heterosexual couple’s along with same-sex couple’s relationships and that same-sex couples can provide just as loving and protecting of a household for a child as would a heterosexual couple would. Many heterosexual parents raise their children with the same amount of love and care as any heterosexual couple
When heterosexual couples get married they get certain benefits such as employee, medical, and estate. Meaning they can leave work in case of an emergency with their spouse and also get insurance for themselves and their spouse. Married couples also get the benefit of bigger tax returns and also money transferred to their account if their spouse dies. Homosexual couples do not get the privilege of being married therefore they do not get the benefits that come along with marriage.
AFTER GAY MARRIAGE, what will become of marriage itself? Will same-sex matrimony extend marriage's stabilizing effects to homosexuals? Will gay marriage undermine family life? A lot is riding on the answers to these questions. But the media's reflexive labeling of doubts about gay marriage as homophobia has made it almost impossible to debate the social effects of this reform. Now with the Supreme Court's ringing affirmation of sexual liberty in Lawrence v. Texas, that debate is unavoidable.
Newton, D. E. (2010). Same-sex Marriage : A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishing Group.
“Being gay is much more profound than simply a sexual relationship; being gay is part of that person’s core identity, and goes right to the very center of his being. It’s like being black in s society of whites, or a blonde European in a nation of black Asians” (Tamara L. Roleff). Although marriage, cohabitation and parenting styles of homosexual families pose no threats to the heterosexual society; many still believe same-sex marriage goes against its true purpose. “At the national level, American public opinion on the issue remains split (44 percent support legalizing same-sex marriage; 53 percent oppose same-sex marriage in a May 2010 Gallup Poll) even as opposition toward legalizing same-sex marriage is at its lowest point in decades (Jones, 2010)” (Amy B. Becker). Also to one’s surprise, among the vast amount of psychological disorders, homosexuality is not one. Homosexuals are just as capable of sustaining stable and successful relationships and families just as heterosexuals.
Wolf, Richard. “Timeline: Same-Sex marriage through the years.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 26 June 2015,
Gay and lesbian couples deserve for their commitment to each other to be viewed with equality on a legal and social level. There are numerous rights withheld from same-sex couples when they are denied the liberty to marry. For example, same-sex couples are usually not considered next-of-kin. In medical situations this means that they are unable to visit their partner in the hospital, or have a say in life-or-death medical decisions (Wolfson). Recently, two reporters from the New York Times calculated that same-sex couples can lose as much as $500,000 over their lifetime, because they are unable to receive employers' spousal health insurance, as well as other disadvantages (Badgett, 2013). On top of the legal issues faced by homosexual couples, they also face discrimination daily. Social acceptance of gay marriage cannot be mandated, but with legalization, gay marriage will eventually become a social ...
Conversely, recent empirical evidence has illustrated the harmful psychological effect of policies restricting marriage rights for same-sex couples. Additionally, children raised by same-sex couples have been shown to be on par with the children of opposite-sex couples in their psychological adjustment, cognitive abilities and social functioning.
Waite, J. Linda. “Social Science Finds: ‘Marriage Matters.’” Read, Reason, Write. By Dorothy U. Seyler. Ed. Emily Barrosse. 8th ed. New York: McGraw, 2008. 566-57. Print.
We live in a very controversial time when it comes to same sex marriages. This issue is one of the most widely discussed controversies along with what rights they deserve and what rights they should be denied. Straight people have very opposing beliefs on this topic, some believe gays are given far too few rights and should be granted ultimate freedom while others believe gays already have enough rights and the debate should end now. This is why our nation is so at war with this issue. The research found explains if marital and family status influence same sex marriages, gay rights, laws on marriage, the strength of gay marriage, and how the government is working to expand gay marriage rights.
Noller, Patricia; Feeney, Judith; Understanding Marriage, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2002, Chapter 6. Popenoe, David. The. “The Social Health of Marriage in America” The National Marriage Project. 2004.
Marriage naturally creates families; it provides the conditions for a healthy environment that is beneficial to the upbringing of children. Opponents of same-sex marriage often ground their arguments on parental and religious concerns. Many argue that sa...
Same sex marriage is a very controversial topic in today’s society. We live in a society filled with ignorance. The ignorance that poisons the minds of people that oppose same sex marriage blinds them from the reality of the “problem”. People argue that same sex marriage should be illegal for reasons that will have no negative impact on their lives. The reality of this topic is that legalizing same sex marriage promotes the increase of adoption, human rights and equality, as well as the separation of the church and state.