Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The death of socrates analysis
Death of Socrates contemporary analysis
Euthyphro's dilemma essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The death of socrates analysis
In Plato’s The Trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates, a well –known man of Athens is judged by trial for two impious acts, corrupting the youth and introducing new gods. While in court he is rejoined by an old friend Euthyphro, he asks him about his case and finds Euthyphro is prosecuting his own father. Socrates finds that to him this does not seem like a pious act and he asks Euthyphro to teach his what piety is to help his own trial. As Euthyphro attempts to define piety, Socrates rejects his definition and asks him to redefine piety. Eventually, after four attempts to define piety Euthyphro gives up and Socrates is left unsatisfied on the debate of what piety really is. These four attempts to define piety are because they represent major fallacies in writing/speaking where one tends to weaken their argument by failing to address the point.
In Euthyphro’s first attempt to define piety he uses examples of pious and impious actions. In his first example, Euthyphro states that the prosecution of his father is in fact a pious action. He says “what I am doing now, to prosecute the wrongdoer “is pious and “not to prosecute is impious” (5d-e). Euthyphro says this because his father is a murderer and regardless of his relation to him it would be impious not to punish a wrongful act. In his example he regards that whether it is “murder or temple robbery” (5d) the “law is so” (5e). Here Euthyphro explains that there is law for a reason and that regardless of who is committing the crime they should be punished for not following the law. In a furtherance of this explanation, Euthyphro compares himself to the Greek god Zeus, “Zeus...bound his father because he unjustly swallowed his sons…and that he in turn castrated his father” (5e-6a). B...
... middle of paper ...
...this kind of care as servitude to the gods. Which poses Socrates to raise the question of “what…excellent aim that the gods achieve, using us as their servants?” (14e). He responds by saying that the gods achieve many things including prayer and sacrifice. However, Socrates is able to come to a conclusion that since people are not gods that they are not able to know that god necessarily benefit from these gifts they receive. Here Socrates is faced with the problem of circularity because “pious is…pleasing to the gods, but not beneficial or dear to them” (15b) where he is still unsure of the true definition of piety.
These four attempts made by Euthyphro and rejections by Socrates help readers understand logical fallacies and help improve their ability to develop an argument that doesn’t rely on examples, circular or confusing metaphors, or ambiguous relationships.
In the Euthyphro, Plato describes the proceedings of a largely circular argument between Socrates and Euthyphro, a self-declared prophet and pious man, over the nature of piety and even of the gods themselves. The issues raised in this dialogue have been reinterpreted and extended to remain relevant even with a modern theological framework, so much so that the central issue is now known simply as ?the Euthyphro dilemma.? This is based on Socrates? two-way choice which he offers in the dialogue:
Many people have gone through their lives conforming their beliefs and practices for the sake of fitting in or for the happiness of others, but Socrates was not one of these people. In “The Apology” Plato shows Socrates unwillingness to conform through a speech given by Socrates while on trial for supposedly corrupting the youth of Athens and believing in false gods. Although the title of the dialogue was labeled “The Apology,” Socrates’ speech was anything but that, it was a defense of himself and his content along his philosophical journey. At no time during the trial was Socrates willing to change his ways in order to avoid punishment, two reasons being his loyalty to his God and his philosophical way of life.
Euthyphro’s second definition of piety is “the pious is what the gods love”. Socrates takes this idea and
I am going to attempt to show that although the argument that Socrates makes in The Republic by Plato is valid, it is not sound. I am going to explain his argument and challenge a premise that he has made to support his argument.
During the dialogue, Euthyphro defines, “Piety means prosecuting the unjust individual who has committed murder or sacrilege, or any other such crime, as I am doing now, whether he is your father or mother or whoever he is.” Given this Euthyphro overarching principles can be summarized as divine law requires to prosecute the offender no matter who she or he is. Also, the ideology should be what befits humans as well. Socrates is fine with how Euthyphro accounts the factual evidence of his father’s misguided acts. What Socrates takes problem is how Euthyphro uses greek mythology to highlight that taking action against your parents is the correct direction of action. Due to the fact that mythology isn’t confirmed to be true in any sense, socrates feels as though this is extremely inappropriate. Euthyphro actions should be based on divine law with results in him being impious. Socrates ultimate principles can be summarized as respect for parents should be the ultimate law combined with whatever does not befit the gods shouldn’t befit everyone else. Insert another
In the Euthyphro, Socrates is making his way into the courthouse; however, prior to entering he had a discussion with a young priest of Athens, Euthyphro. This dialogue relates religion and justice to one another and the manner in which they correlate. Euthyphro feels as though justice necessitates religion and Socrates feels the opposite, religion necessitates justice. Euthyphro claims that religion is everything, justice, habits, traditions, customs, cultures, etc. all are derived from religion. Socrates went on to question what exactly would be the definition of pious. Euthyphro offered Socrates three definitions of pious and in all three Socrates was able to successfully find fault...
There are times in every mans life where our actions and beliefs collide—these collisions are known as contradictions. There are endless instances in which we are so determined to make a point that we resort to using absurd overstatements, demeaning language, and false accusations in our arguments. This tendency to contradict ourselves often questions our character and morals. Similarly, in The Trial of Socrates (Plato’s Apology), Meletus’ fallacies in reason and his eventual mistake of contradicting himself will clear the accusations placed on Socrates. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates is not guilty of corrupting the youth with the idea of not believing in the Gods but of teaching the youth to think for themselves by looking to new divinities.
In The Republic, Plato strives to display through the character and conversations of Socrates that justice is better than just the proper good for which men must strive for, regardless of whether they could receive equal benefit from choosing otherwise. His method is to use the dialogue from Socrates, questions which led the reader from one point to another, supposedly with convincing logic by obtaining agreement to each point before proceeding to the next, and so constructing an intriguing argument.
When discussing specific knowledge, it is often hard to pin down an exact definition of what it is you are discussing. Often a concept or word will get thrown around so often that it will begin to be taken for granted and when pressed, a person may struggle to pin down specifically what it is they mean. Realizing this, Socrates often went out and attempted to fix these kinds of problems and find out what people actually knew, compared to what they just thought they knew. In the dialogues Euthyphro and Meno, Socrates attempts to pin down definitions for piety and virtue, respectively. In doing so, we are shown that the thinkers in question struggle to define these terms, and attempt to do so in vague terms that may vary heavily under different circumstances. What Socrates is attempting to find is one definitive definition of piety and virtue, what is called his One Form Requirement. Rather than defining something by classifying different parts that make it up, Socrates maintains the belief that piety and virtue both can be simplified into one specific form that describes exactly what makes all F actions F.
In the defense speech given by Socrates at the beginning of his trial, he hints at a definition of holiness. “..I live in great poverty because of my service to the god” (23C). Piety, according to Socrates, is defined by one who sacrifices his own necessities and luxuries in order to better service the gods; it is the willingness of one to please the god by way of a disservice to himself; a general forfeit of life-excesses as well as life requirements.
The story that is found in Plato’s dialogue Euthyphro proposes a dilemma that has since been a very controversial subject. When Socrates encounters Euthyphyo, he is on his way to trail to face charges against his own father. His father had been accused o...
Euthyphro was arguing that by doing what the gods believe is holy and pious you are making them better, in other words you are taking care of them and it is like a kind of service that you are doing towards the gods. Euthyphro said, “The kind of care, Socrates, that slaves take of their masters” which meant that you are taking care of them in the sense that you are making them better and not actually caring for them (17, 13d). In other words, you are helping improve them and this is a service that the gods appreciate and want you to do. He believed that this service is improving the gods and that they like this service. The gods believe that being holy is a service towards them, therefore there should be a reason on why the gods use us and want to reward our holiness. He believes that the gods choose what is holy for a reason and should be approved by
In conclusion, through the remained literatures of the ancient Greeks, one can see that the Greeks believed that they were created to glorify their gods and that the exchange between human beings and gods are obvious. Hence, one should please the gods to be blessed.
This is when Socrates would have a conversation with someone and ask them questions about beliefs that they strongly hold. Depending on the answers they give, Socrates would continue to ask them questions to the point where they themselves would disagree with their original statement. The use of the Socratic method is used to shine a light on what the person is actually saying and whether or not it is indeed a wise statement, by critically reviewing their ideas flaws and logic of said statement. This ideology is seen as a “system, a spirit, a method, a type of philosophical inquiry an intellectual technique, all rolled into one” according to Gregory Vlastos, a Socrates scholar and professor of philosophy at Princeton. In particular the Socratic method is to logically assess an individual's ideas and beliefs on matters such as knowledge, reality, and existence. For example, this is shown in a dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro called Euthyphro written by Plato. The dialogue features Socrates and Euthyphro, a religious expert, who tells Socrates that he is prosecuting his father for unintentionally killing a worker on their farm by exposure. After chaining him outside for days, his father awaited a message from a diviner in Athens on how he should punish the for murdering a domestic worker on the farm during a drunken row. When Socrates commented on how strange it is for Euthyphro to prosecute his own father for an act that would surely have him executed, Euthyphro explained that not prosecuting someone for murder is unpious, which means it is an unholy act. For example in the text, Euthyphro explains “One should only consider whether the killer acted justly or not; if he acted justly, let him alone; if not, prosecute even a killer who shares your hearth and home,”, followed by “Now my father and other relatives are furious that I am prosecuting him for a murder on behalf of a
The interesting dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro demonstrates this Socratic method of questioning in order to gain a succinct definition of a particular idea, such as piety. Though the two men do not come to a conclusion about the topic in the conversation seen in Euthyphro, they do discover that piety is a form of justice, which is more of a definition than their previous one. Their conversation also helps the reader to decipher what makes a good definition. Whenever Euthyphro attempts to define piety, Socrates seems to have some argument against the idea. Each definition offered, therefore, becomes more succinct and comes closer to the actual concept of piety, rather than just giving an example or characteristic of it. To be able to distinguish between a good definition and a bad one is the first step to defining what Socrates so desperately wished to define: w...