Ruth Benedict Ethics Are Relative Summary

770 Words2 Pages

In Ruth Benedict’s “Ethics are Relative”, she argues that because morals and values change with time and across culture, there can be no solid judgment for any action to be consistently deemed “right” or “wrong”, since the same action will be viewed differently when considered from different points of view. Benedict’s primary assertion is that the ethics seen as good or bad by modern cultures are not better to those found in primitive cultures, but are the values we have developed over time. “Most of the simpler cultures did not gain the wide currency of the one which, out of our experience, we identify with human nature, but this was for various historical reasons, and certainly not for any that gives us as its carriers a monopoly of social …show more content…

Using the traits trance catalepsy, she investigates how their appearance in individuals affects ones potential for status in different cultures. She states that mystics who claim psychic abilities or spiritual powers are present in every culture, and in most cultures are highly valued and respected for their abilities. Yet in our culture, such people are considered insane, and are often placed in psychiatric institutions. As for our view on homosexuality, Benedict makes the point that because it’s looked down upon makes it difficult for someone with the trait to fit into society, whereas in other cultures, such as ancient Greece, people with such inclinations were perfectly capable of functioning ordinarily in society, even in positions of honor. Benedict says, “Plato’s republic is, of course, the most convincing statement of such regarding of homosexuality. It is presented as one of the major mean to the good life, and it was generally so regarded in Greece at the …show more content…

“In this tribe the exogamic groups look upon each other as prime manipulators of black magic, so that one marries always into an enemy group which remains for life one’s deadly and unappeasable foes”. It is a strictly enforced custom to forbid the sharing of food, as they are so mistrustful that they receive any gift with suspicion, believing it to be poisoned. In this society, nobody works with or shares with one another, “but there was one man of sunny, kindly disposition who liked work and to be helpful…men and women never spoke of him without laughing; he was silly and simple and definitely crazy. Nevertheless, to the ethnologist used to a culture that has, in Christianity, made of his type the model of all virtue, he seemed a pleasant

Open Document