Ron And Janet Reimer Case Study

1257 Words3 Pages

Ron and Janet Reimer had twin boys in 1996 named Bruce and Brain. Both twins developed problems urinating from phimosis. Their pediatrician recommended circumcision. Bruce went first and his physician botched the operation, leaving him without a penis. The parents forewent surgery on the other twin. Money, psychologist, pioneered the field of sexology. He concluded that psychological sex did not always agree with the genetic sex, or with the sex glands present on the body. He claimed that whether an adult lived as a female or a male depended on how one was raised, and not based on their biological sex. Gender identity refers to how one sees oneself and how one behaves. Gender role refers to how one acts in public or how the public expects …show more content…

Sinai Hospital, dexamethasone had been prescribed to pregnant women with CAH fetuses. Dexamethasone prevents androgens from reaching the fetus and hence prevents the development of ambiguous genitalia. Without intervention, CAH females tend to be tomboyish and more sexually oriented towards other females. In 2010 Dreger, a bioethicist raised many issues about this protocol. First, why was it necessary to normalize CAH female? Second was this protocol safe? Dexamethasone was being used "off-label," it was in some sense experimental. Third could their be possible long-term harm from fetal sex. In 2010 federal regulators sided with Dr. New and upheld her research on dexamethasone for CAH fetuses absolving her of any charges of unethical behavior. What is normal and who defines it? Is it necessary to have conjoined twins separated? People with ambiguous anatomy frustrate us. We don't know what to expect from them or where they fit in. As a result, we seek to normalize them or regard them as freaks. Most families cannot accept a child with ambiguous genitalia or mixed reproductive organs. Families express disgust at going home with an "it." Furthermore, most children are not informed about their problems at birth with ambiguous genitalia, if they are …show more content…

She argued that everyone should know his or her true origins and make their own decisions about their gender and sexuality. In 1990s Chase and other intersex people challenged the view of Hopkins/Money that early surgery hormones were good for intersex children. This situation of intersex children is parallel to conjoined twins. Most parents consider such births an emergency at birth and ask surgeons to normalize conjoined twins, even at the cost of killing both children. Dreger and Chase argued that physicians and families should let the adolescent decide for themselves what gender they wants to be. Second, physicians should help families understand that a child with intersex can be happy with ambiguous gender. Thirdly, if physicians and families guess wrong about gender, intersex can be irreversibly harmed. Lastly crises at birth about gender were socially constructed and mediated by ignorance and fear. However, the American Academy of Pediatrics disagreed. In its 2000 guidelines on how to deal with intersex children, its states " the birth of a child with ambiguous genitalia constitutes a social emergency." In the last 20 years, a remarkable change has occurred in North American culture. Transgenders, lesbians, and gay men are increasingly being accepted as normal. Over the years many TV shows exhibited stories of transgender people in a positive light. However, parents worry that this could just be a social

Open Document