Role Of Prosecution In Prosecution

1069 Words3 Pages

The initial intention of the prosecutor is to protect society, not just the individual victim. Prosecutors obtain an uncommon opportunity, by means of effective early involvement, to put a stop to potential incidences of domestic violence. The verdict to advance with prosecution is not the victim’s choice, but the prosecutor’s. Despite this the rate of prosecution is still regulated by the reluctance of so many victims to participate in the prosecution. When victims cooperate, prosecutors are seven times more likely to proceed with prosecution (McCorkle, 2017). Most victims are reluctant to take part in prosecution because of their own personal goals of enhancing safety, maintaining economic viability, protecting their children, or forcing the offender in participate in batterer’s counseling. There are also some leading elements that motivates victims to initiate prosecution in their domestic violence cases like: the curiosity about how criminal justice system could assist them in meeting their specific needs, the confirmation of
It has been a long-lasting concern that prosecutors in domestic violence cases have a tendency to significantly restrict charges filed after the police hand out the initial charges. Pro-arrest policies may have consumed the prosecutors’ offices, but research confirms “that prosecutors may reject or drop as many as 80% of domestic violence cases” (McCorkle, 2017). Prosecutors tend to not take domestic violence cases seriously when numerous charges of felony battery and other specific domestic violence crimes are downgraded to standard regular assaults that are pliable to judicial dismissal. The outcome of prosecutorial actions of this nature have played a role in a “funnel effect” in which domestic violence cases are channeled out of the criminal justice system by nullifying police charging behavior and, ultimately, undermining pro-arrest

Open Document