Robert Louis Wilkens The Spirit Of Early Christian Thought

867 Words2 Pages

Theology, as defined by Merriam Webster, is the study of religious faith, practice, and experience. In our class it was defined more concisely as “faith seeking understanding”. Both of these definitions are simplistic and require additional elaboration to discover all that theology encompasses and how it is performed. Using works of respected theological scholars can assist in defining in this unique discipline. A key component that distinguishes theology from other forms of study, is the procedure in performing said study. In other disciplines, physics for example, intellectuals make an observation and then attempt to explain the observation through equations or theories. The process is somewhat reversed in theology. Going along with the …show more content…

There must be assumptions made about a higher power originally to continue to study the implications of revelation and scripture. Some could use this fact to discredit theology because its basis rests on substance that cannot be proven, but other theological scholars say that it is not unreasonable in any sense. Robert Louis Wilkens investigates this in his work, The Spirit of Early Christian Thought. He compares this need for assumptions about God, to how we interpret history, “What we know of past events depends on the testimony of those who have witnessed them. Historical events are unique and singular, and one cannot run an experiment to verify whether what is reported is true” (Wilkins 169). Since events in the past are inherently impossible to prove, not making assumptions would disqualify study of everything beyond the physical world. Unlike mathematics or physics, where often information is undisputable, theology relies on hearsay and belief. But it is unfair to diminish theology because it relies of faith since faith is a part of daily life. Wilkins references the ancient Christian theologian Augustine who said, “In practical life, I cannot see how anyone can refuse to believe …show more content…

We must believe people in authority to function in our world today; reason alone is not sufficient to explain everything in life. So to practice theology, we look toward an authority on God, a witness of revelation of some sort, and have faith in their word, just as we would a historian. The witnesses that Christians use are the writers of the Holy Bible. This scripture is in a sense a compilation of several of the witnesses’ testimony of God’s acts. Dei Verbum of the Second Vatican Council articulates this point, “God, who through the Word creates all things (see John 1:3) and keeps them in existence, gives men an enduring witness to Himself in created realities” (Dei Verbum). The Word of God is used by theologians as a baseline narrative of revelation, and then they try to determine what is meant by God. Opponents of theology will point to certain parts of scripture that are quite obviously not scientifically accurate, and use these facts to discredit the Word. Ratzinger would retort by saying that the Bible should be considered unequivocal; it is in fact a living document much like the Constitution. He states, “It is untenable on the basis of the objective structure of the Word, on account of

Open Document