Richard Holmes Acts Of War: The Behavior Of Men In Battle

1827 Words4 Pages

“Now the bleedin war is over Oh, how happy I was there; Now old Fritz and I have parted, Life’s one everlasting care. No more estaminets to sing in, No mamoiselles to make me gay; Civvie life’s a bleedin failure, I was happy yesterday.”(398). This post-World War II song exemplifies the complexity of soldiers’ feelings towards war. There is no simplicity in how a soldier feels in battle or in the sanity under which they operate; often there is no method to the madness. The extreme conditions of war reveal man’s basic instincts and expose human nature. In an attempt to understand the issues that influence a soldier on the front line, Richard Holmes’s Acts of War: The Behavior of Men in Battle faces the grisly truth about men in war. Holmes addresses soldiers’ motivations in and out of battle. He addresses fear, pain, fatigue, the enemy, and death as a part of battle. Out of the field, he discusses boredom, patriotism, religion, basic training, and family. The main points are well-researched and essential to understanding soldiers’ actions within war. His attention to the unpleasant details, that he deems essential to a soldier’s …show more content…

Mosquitos specifically spread deadly diseases in addition to giving incredibly uncomfortable bites. The addition of Mepacrine pills that prevent malaria made the disease less dangerous, but the pills were incredibly unpopular. They turned the men a yellowish hue and made them feel hot and uncomfortable. Taking the pills was a responsibility of the command and often led to friction between the officers and enlisted. Men did not want to take the pills and the command had to enforce the prescriptions. Insects had a detrimental role in the Gallipoli campaign of World War I. Trooper I.L. Idriess recalls, ”…a lot of flies flew into my mouth and beat about inside…I nearly howled with rage…Of all the bastards of places this is the greatest bastard in the world”

Open Document