Although by 1995 the women’s rights movement had already achieved many of the goals that had plagued them for centuries due to the successes of second wave feminism, around the world women were still a largely marginalized group. In Hillary Clinton’s “Women’s Rights are Human Rights” speech, Clinton realized that members of a marginalized group in society can often put off potential supporters from all walks of life due to their aggressiveness in fighting for reform, and thus decided to take a tone of cautious optimism rather than one of condemnation or rebuke. She used this tone to argue for unity between men and women, and amongst women themselves. She jumps right into this message with a plethora of repetition to build her ethos, evens out …show more content…
The use of repetition in this instance is a device to allow her to build her intrinsic ethos, and to create an ethical appeal to her audience. In paragraph 2, she describes all the places and ways that women come together: “Women come together every day in every country. We come together in fields and factories, in village markets and supermarkets, in living rooms and board rooms. Whether it is while playing with our children in the park, or washing clothes in a river, or taking a break at the office water cooler, we come together and talk about our aspirations and concern.“ She addresses women of every social circumstance and part of the world as to show the objectiveness and understanding nature of her character. This statement builds trust between her and her mostly female audience, because almost all, if not all of her audience will relate themselves to one of those situations. She also uses asyndeton in that passage, when describing the places where women come together. Her exclusion of conjunctions between all the locations and the use of anaphora in the repetition of “we come together” serves to emphasize the countless number of places that women meet globally, which again helps to strengthen her ethos, …show more content…
She starts off this section of the speech by acknowledging that there are some who question the need for The World Conference for Women, and then, in paragraph 5, uses a series of cause-effect statements to dismantle the arguments of that antithetic group: “What we are learning around the world is that if women are healthy and educated, their families will flourish. If women are free from violence, their families will flourish. If women have a chance to work and earn as full and equal partners in society, their families will flourish. And when families flourish, communities and nations do as well.” Her repetition of the “if women...their families will…” sentence structure allows her to emphasize to the audience the multitude of ways in which women matter to communities around the world. By directly connecting the power of women to the success of entire nations, she forces men and women of all circumstances to recognize the importance of women to their lives. In the body of her speech, Clinton establishes her logos by presenting clear facts, and uses inductive reasoning to come to an understandable
Within Hon. Shirley Chisholm’s well known speech, Equal Rights for Women, which she presented on May 21, 1969, she discusses in detail the ideology of woman’s rights before the United States House of Representatives. She touches base on her own experience with discrimination, how society has prejudice against women, and introduces the Equal rights act, in which she states “that has been before every Congress for the last 40 years and that sooner or later must become part of the basic law of the land.” With her speech, Hon. Shirley Chisholm makes a substantial argument about women’s rights. With her use of anecdotes, counter arguments, and statistics, her speech obtains great value.
It is also a coming together, much the way women come together every day in
Ulrich had a well explanation for her slogan on "well-behaved women." She supports her slogan by bringing up certain women stereotypes that have been going on throughout history. She uses these stereotypes to explain how certain people view on women.
A short speech from a politician during the Civil Rights era is “For the Equal Rights Amendment”, delivered by Shirley Chisholm. In this speech, Chisholm uses ethos, pathos, and logos to argue her point of equal rights. An example of ethos that could be found in the speech is when Chisholm says “The Constitution they wrote was designed to protect the rights of white, male citizens. As there were no black Founding Fathers, there were no founding mothers -- a great pity, on both counts. It is not too late to complete the work they left undone. Today, here, we should start to do so.” This would serve as an example of ethos because Chisholm is showing creditably by mentioning why the Constitution was wrote. Additionally, she challenges what the
She uses pathos when she emphasizes the things women do that can relate to each other, she combines two fragments that can mean the opposite form each other but complement in a way "whether it is while playing with our children in the park, or washing clothes in a river, or taking a break at the office water cooler, we come together and talk about our aspirations and concern.” Here she talks about washing clothes in a river and taking a break in the office, actions two different type of people do. Solidarity is the main emotion she is portraying to the public. She touches hearts when she talks about the struggles some women go through to help their families the right way and how she feels for them “I want to speak for those women in my own country, women who are raising children on the minimum wage, women who can’t afford health care or child care, women whose lives are threatened by violence, including violence in their own homes.”
The two biggest wars in the world were the Great War and The World War 2 that have ended a long time ago. However, there is still another war ongoing in the world, it is a “Women’s war.” In this war, women are fighting for their own rights in every country include American. In order to encourage women in this long fight, on September 5, 1995, Hillary Clinton gave the “Women’s right are Human’s right” speech at the United Nation’s Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing. She argued for the equal rights of the women and against the abuse of women around the world. Logos, ethos, parallelism are three elements make “Women’s right are Human’s right” an effective speech.
Clinton repeats the words “If women” followed by “will” (Clinton), this gives the audience a reason to accept her propositions. Good outcomes come with good actions. When she concluded her speech, Hillary kept using the repetition of the words dignity, respect, family and children. Clinton’s credibility is not questioned when she says she has been working in the case, “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families” (Clinton) this is the way she knows about women and their necessities, “I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton).Her goal is definite, “To strengthen families and societies by empowering women to take greater control over their own destinies”( Clinton). This change will not only affect women, but everyone who surrounds them.
...ualities and influences we want to accept as truth instead of blindly accepting the book of myths. She encourages women to descend the ladder and find the “thing itself” and the meaning that thing has for each individual woman.
When creating a comparative rhetorical analysis of two different feminist essays, we must first define the term “feminism”. According to Merriam-Webster.com, feminism is “the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities”. Feminism is a also a long term social movement, one that’s been in the works since the early 1900’s. However, as any challenger to the norm might receive, the words ‘feminism’ and ‘feminist’ have gotten a bad reputation. Throughout the years, popular opinion has agreed that if you’re a feminist, you hate men, and don’t shave. It’s a very close-minded belief, and both Lindy West and Roxane Gay agree. Both authors of the essays I am comparing today, West and Gay try and convey their beliefs that feminism isn’t what you think it is. However, they do it in very different ways. Who conveyed their beliefs of feminism better and the superior argument? That is what I am going to display today.
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
...n our country. She’s saying that the advancement of women is getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. This was such a strong point in her speech because it shed light into the logical thinking, and made a historical connection to slavery. By making this connection, she was able to help many see that women were convicted slaves to the current state of the union.
In conclusion, women throughout the decades have strived, from protesting to going on trials, to point out their rights. “Will women soon be treated equally as men?” A day when women and men having the same rights is still under way and has a far way to go as from the antebellum period. However, what makes women so unique, especially during this era is the numerous of contributions these respectful woman played a part of in order to see dramatic changes in America’s society. Some of the extraordinary ideas developed by them explains the success leading into what we call America today. Therefore, it is proven that women are certainly not helpless species, but are useful citizens who aroused much commitment for their “race” and nation.
Throughout her speech, Hillary Clinton highlights the importance of women’s equality by using repetition. She initially points out women’s significance in different fields, saying that women commit themselves to industry, economics, and families (Para. 3). She repeats the phrase, “if women are,” several times - “If women are healthy and educated, their families will flourish; if women are free from violence, their families will flourish; if women have a chance to work and earn as full and equal partners in society, their families will flourish” (Para. 3). The direct usage of anaphora – a type of repetition that repeats a sequence of words at the beginning of neighboring clauses – at the beginning of Clinton’s speech, clearly shows her intended audience that women play a crucial role in society. A big portion of women today no longer lag behind men, and they even shoulder the burden of great responsibilities.
People started to open their ears and their hearts. Her overall purpose is to show that there is a gap between men and women that cannot be overlooked and sidestepped for any longer. Women don't only deserve the right to vote, but they deserve the same rights as men. Applying logos, juxtaposition, and strong use of diction to her speech, she connects to her audience and reveals to them the reasons why what she is saying is crucial to the country.
Renowned British actress and activist for the feminist movement, Emma Watson, in her speech to the United Nations, “HeForShe,” argues that gender discrimination is a plague to human civilization. Watson’s purpose is to sway the audience that gender inequality has to come to an end, with the support of men and women as advocates for egalitarianism. Additionally, she enlightens the audience that the problem originated from political affairs, the economy, and social disparity. Watson creates a compassionate tone in order to convey men, specifically those who negatively perceived feminism or did not think that feminist issues affected them. Nevertheless, Watson’s speech is ineffectively persuasive due to the poor description she formulated