Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Emma Watson

1056 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Rhetorical analysis of emma watson's speech

Emma Watson’s Speech About Feminism Will there ever truly be and end to gender inequality? Emma Watson is not only a known actress but also identifies as a feminist . A feminist is someone who believes in the equality of the genders, and Watson makes it clear how passionate she is for both genders to be involved in feminism. Notably. Watson’s speech is mainly about the “HeForShe” campaign, which is a campaign aiming for both women and men to work together to put an end to gender inequality. Watson convinces those listening to her speech how crucial it is to be involved in feminism through ethos and logos. FIrst most, a very clear rhetorical appeal in Watson’s speech is her use of ethos. Watson’s use of ethos is show when she talks about her realizing from a young age how much sexism there is around us and how much it affects women and men, “I started questioning gender-based assumptions when at eight I was confused at being called “bossy,” because I wanted to direct the plays we put on …show more content…

When at 14 I started being sexualized by certain elements of the press. When at 15 my girlfriends started dropping out of their sports teams because they didn't want to appear “muscly”. When at 18 my male friends were unable to express their feelings” (Watson 1). It’s every evident about how Watson witnessed how double standards can affect everyone, her dealing with sexism is very credible as to why she would want to end gender inequality and makes us trust Watson as we listen to her educate us about how important it is for people to be willing to change the injustice. Another piece of her speech that uses ethos to convince the listener, is when Watson talk about her rights as a women, and how most of these rights hasn’t happened, “I am for Britain and think it is right that as a woman I am paid the same as my male counterparts, I think it is right that I

Show More
Related

  • The Challenges Of Feminism In The 1960's

    1606 Words  | 4 Pages

    Feminism and the right to equality has been a long and arduous struggle for women before the Civil Rights Act. The Feminine Mystique sparked a change, questioning society, which continues today as women fight for equal treatment regardless of laws that claim for their protection. Feminists will continue to fight for the day where women will be treated as equals, where there will be no gender bias, and for the day when a woman can state her mind, just as her male counterpart, without being called an uptight

    Read More

  • 102 Minutes Rhetorical Analysis

    407 Words  | 1 Pages

    In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.

    Read More

  • The Book Thief Rhetorical Analysis

    1186 Words  | 3 Pages

    “I have hated the words and I have loved them, and I hope I have made them right.” (Zusak 528) Words and the power they possess is a common theme that is heavily mentioned throughout the novel The Book Thief by Markus Zusak. Throughout this book, rhetoric affects multiple characters in both positive and negative ways. There are instances in this book in which one can see how words have the ability to tear people down, educate and inform, and to inspire individuals to follow their dreams.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Best In Class By Margaret Talbot

    497 Words  | 1 Pages

    Students in school typically work long hours in order to achieve high standards academically. Those who achieve the highest grades are honored with the title of valedictorian. However, the title has been under attack as students and parents call for the title to either be extended to more students or abolished entirely. In “Best in class by Margaret Talbot, Talbot claims that schools should keep the single valedictorian system, but reduce its overall importance; she claims that using contrast and selective presentation.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: Julia Gillard And Rebecca Sloan

    868 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Helen Sword (2012 pg.48), “A carefully crafted sentence welcomes its reader like a comfortable rocking chair” and “helps its reader navigate tricky terrain like a well-hewn walking stick”. Therefore, varying styles and methods of sentences are an important construct in the written language. Hence through examining Julia Gillard’s and Rebecca Sloan’s use of sentence structure and grammar, this rhetorical analysis will attempt to explore how differing mediums and cultural contexts of writers portrays their credibility which are effectively used to convey a particular agenda to their intended audience.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Amy Poehler

    1145 Words  | 3 Pages

    In her ,“Harvard”, address, actress, comedian and producer Amy Poehler speaks to the graduating class of 2011. Her speech is filled with her uplifting sense of humor and her down-to-earth personality that you can’t help but enjoy. Poehler utilizes various rhetorical strategies throughout her address such as allusion, and conveying pathos in a humourous as well as an emotional way. By using these, she successfully encourages the young students and families at Harvard University to work their hardest and take on the world.

    Read More

  • The Justifications Of Social Inequalities In Jean-Jean Rousseau

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is a declaration for the equal rights of man and women. The political significance of Mary Wollstonecraft cannot be overstated—her work is regarded as one of the first greatest feminist treatises in history and is also seen as the first step towards liberal feminism. She fought equality for women in the political sphere, but she also addressed the need for equality in the social, private realm. She emphasized the need for reform in women’s status, education, and maternal duties. In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Wollstonecraft argues that men and women are born with the same ability to reason. Therefore, men and woman should equally be able to exercise reason and attain knowledge. And conclusively, educated women would ultimately improve society; they would become better wives and mothers (72, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman). She argues that the current education system (i.e. Rousseau’s ideas of women education) restricts women and subjects them into passivity. Women are not perceivably “smart” as men because they have not been given the opportunity to be; women receive a “disorderly kind of education” (46, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman). Women are kept in passivity, forced to superficiality and shallowness. She derides these traits that are seen as inherent to a woman’s nature and asks the powerful question: how are women supposed to contribute to society if they have been reduced to their appearance and bodily function? For a thriving, modern and true civilization to succeed, each and every individual must be encouraged to seek moral and intellectual development, including

    Read More

  • Exploring Misogyny: Societal Rules and Female Freedom

    1062 Words  | 3 Pages

    This is clearly evident in Betty Warren’s condemnation of Professor Katherine Watson’s progressive, feminist ideals. Warren writes, “It is our duty- nay, obligation to reclaim our place in the home . . . Her [Watson] subversive and political teachings encourage our Wellesley girls to reject the roles they were born to fill” (01:08:01-01:08:28). By writing this, she clearly indicates that Watson’s denial of a traditional lifestyle is deplorable. Warren also implies that Watson is not a respectable woman, being as she lives a lifestyle that is not in accordance with what a woman is meant to do. The entire publication is a direct attack on Watson’s gender identity, being that it suggests that she is not feminine enough. Warren hopes that with this publication, Watson will quiet her voice. This is her way of maintaining the patriarchal elements of their society.

    Read More

  • Women's Brains By Stephen Gould Rhetorical Analysis

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    Women’s Brains deals with the abuse of scientific data in order to “prove” negative social analyses with prejudiced groups such as women, blacks, and poor people. Evolutionary biologist Stephen Gould points out the flaws in the scientific methods of various scientists and correctly asserts that many scientists incorrectly used anthropometric data to support social analyses that degrade prejudiced groups.

    Read More

  • Emma Watson Ethos Pathos Logos

    436 Words  | 1 Pages

    I chose Emma Watson’s speech at the UN about feminism because I had previously watched a clip on facebook and it stuck with me. Watson uses arguments to inform and to inspire as well as using all three of pathos, logos, and ethos. In the speech, Watson asks men to understand that gender inequality is their issue as well.

    Read More

  • What Is The Tone Of The Professions For Women By Virginia Woolf Speech

    1465 Words  | 3 Pages

    Woolf begins the speech by creating a self-effacing tone by undermining her qualifications to speak before the National Society for Women’s Service. She creates the attitude that her story of entering a profession is unprofound, which in turn implies

    Read More

  • On The Waterfront Gender Analysis

    550 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although men are definitely crucial to fixing the problem, “the young [women] are prominent in most revolutions” (Evans 165-166). It is very important for women to stand up for equality through their actions not just their words. That means pushing back on the expectations some men put on them and proving they are just as independent and capable as men. It is equally important for men to be advocates for gender equality because change will not happen if we do not keep our minds open. Women can protect as many times as they wish but if men do not acknowledge their actions, equality is impossible to achieve. It is difficult to understand why people discriminate based on gender because we’re all the same, we’re all human, gender does not define who you are or what you are capable of doing. Once every man comes to that realization, we will all be equal and there will be no gender roles or standards. In Emma Watson’s HeForShe campaign speech at the United Nations, she explains the importance of involving men in the movement because “gender equality is [their] issue too” (Watson). She believes if men do not have to be aggressive in order to be accepted, women will not feel compelled to be submissive in compliance. Many problems related to gender inequality impacting women specifically are caused by the social standards placed on men so involving men in the movement is unquestionably important, as Watson emphasizes in her entire

    Read More

  • Jane Austen Rhetorical Analysis

    563 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marriage is the biggest and final step between two young people who love one another more than anything. In the marriage proposals by Charles Dickens and Jane Austen we are able to see two different reasons for marriage. While Dickens takes a more passionate approach, Austen attempts a more formal and logical proposal. Rhetorical strategies, such as attitude and diction, have a great impact on the effect the proposals have on the women.

    Read More

  • The American Feminist Movement

    1310 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although the ideology has noble intentions, the word itself has become taboo and those who identify as feminist are perceived to have the quality of misandry: the hatred of men (“misandry”). This is incorrect because feminism, unlike misandry, is the ideology that all genders should be treated equally in every facet of society (“feminism”). The true definition is absent of the phrase “aiming for equality while hating men.” Though feminism does not imply misandry, much of society is under the impression that misandry and feminism, two very different ideologies, share the same meaning. Emma Watson, the Goodwill Ambassador for the UN Women, in an event to launch the HeForShe campaign eloquently stated, “I have realized that fighting for women’s rights has too often become synonymous with man-hating. If there is one thing I know for certain, it is that this has got to stop” (Watson). This movement is not discriminatory toward men, in fact, the HeForShe campaign is actively encouraging the male population to join. Watson addresses the lack of male support in the movement by retorting, “It is time that we all see gender as a spectrum instead of two sets of opposing ideas” she additionally states, “How can we effect change in the world when only half of it is invited, or feels welcome to participate in the conversation” (Watson). Social change will

    Read More

  • Emma Watson Speech Analysis

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    For instance, Watson provides a concept that requires more confirmation: “It will take seventy-five years, or for me to be nearly 100, before women can expect to be paid the same as men for the same work” (2), there was no indication that her hypothesis makes a good testable comparison using empirical evidence (Logos), and there are no details of the connection between the standards of two or more variables. Consequently, this decreased Watson’s credibility to the audience, which will lead to further examining of her argument, and whether she should have the right to deliberate about gender inequality. Additionally, Watson does not take into consideration of the physical, mental, and natural capabilities of men and women, which obviously indicates that she needs to conduct more investigation to her theory. Lastly, Watson should offer more proof in her statement, rather than by attempting to make the audience feel particular emotions, which does not meet the requirements of the logical

    Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Emma Watson

Open Document