Rhetorical Analysis Of Poverty Inducing Entertainment By Bill O Reilly

390 Words1 Page

In Bill O’Reilly’s article, “Poverty-inducing Entertainment,” he appeals to False Cause. In this certain fallacy it confuses sequence with causation. If B comes after A, the only reasoned B happened was because of A. While many things occur after another in sequential form, many can say it wouldn’t have happened if something else hadn’t have happened, much like that of a False Cause fallacy. Bill O’Reilly believes that Eminem is the reason why the youth is becoming detrimental: “We have poor children without parental guidance selling dope and carrying guns.” This is an example of the False Cause fallacy because Bill O’Reilly believes that if Eminem wouldn’t rap about such things, that kids wouldn’t be without parental guidance and other bad things. The kids are just becoming that way and transitioning with society, Eminem has nothing to do with kids not having parental guidance and them selling dope. …show more content…

In this fallacy it tries to manipulate the audience into an agreement, while also attempting to make an appeal to your emotions. Bill O’Reilly believes the Eminem is nothing to many kids, and does not care about them: “Eminem and his corporate masters care nothing for the legions of confused, aimless youth who are embracing the "gangsta" attitude with a vengeance.” This fallacy represents an Appeal to Pity because it involves the youth and how Eminem cares nothing about them. He attempts to persuade them into his understanding by saying Eminem cares nothing about “the legions of confused”, and how the youth is embracing the “gangsta” attitude. O’Reilly tries to pull on their heartstrings and help the people understand how Eminem is such a bad influence on the

Open Document