Rhetorical Analysis Of Patrick Henry's Speech In The Virginia Convention

545 Words2 Pages

The first aspect of my speech that enhanced its effect was the rhetorical techniques used. Those rhetorical techniques worked best when there was a specific event or idea that needed emphasis. Most speeches are forgotten minutes after their delivery, so it is with the utmost importance that the presenter makes the most important ideas stick with the audience. For example, in order to emphasize the fact that America had shifted away from its ideas of freedom and equal opportunity, an anaphora combined with a hypophora were used. “Whatever happened to the America full of dreams, the America full of opportunity, the America full of hope?” The rhetorical techniques used gave the line a ‘sting’ to it, making it stay with the audience’s minds longer than if there had been no rhetoric. I chose these techniques because I was ending one of my paragraphes that included one of my major …show more content…

The founding fathers’ ideals: freedom, liberty, and equality, have transcended throughout American culture and society. I could best relate this speech to Patrick Henry’s Speech in the Virginia Convention. Henry was extremely frustrated and angry that the American Colonies were on the brink of war with Great Britain, and yet no one was doing anything about it. He wanted the citizens of Virginia, and the rest of the Colonies, to go to arms against Great Britain because of all of the injustice that had been stowed upon the Colonies by them. In contrast, my speech wanted the class to realize the injustice that was being done onto the American Public by the government, through the incredibly low federal minimum wage. I called the class to advocate for the issue, instead of calling them to arms as Henry did. Just as Patrick Henry represented his beliefs all the way back in the Virginia Convention, I portrayed those same beliefs in my speech

Open Document