Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical analysis on hilary clinton womens rights speech
Argumentative Essay about human rights
Women in leadership roles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In what is considered one of the best speeches ever given, Hillary Clinton makes a case for women’s rights. This event was hosted to “bring new dignity and respect to women and girls all over the world” (americanrhetoric.com). Clinton is effective not only presenting here argument to a diversity of audiences, but in capturing the emotions of the audience while also building her credibility. Clinton’s speech is heightened by being presented in a manner in which can reach and relate to a diversity of audiences. She is very careful to ensure that women contribute “in every aspect of life… as mothers, wives, sisters, daughters, learners, workers, citizens, and leaders” (americanrhetoric.com). If Hillary fixated her speech toward women being leaders, she would not have even related to most women. Women do want rights, but that does not necessarily conclude that they want to be anything more than a housewife. Hillary uses climax in her list from mothers to leaders in order to emphasize the diverse, yet equal, opportunities of women and thereby reaches a larger audience. …show more content…
About halfway through her speech, she uses a rather long, but effective, list of the violations of human rights manifested in abuse toward women. Her list includes rather disturbing abuses; ranging from sexual violations to violent deaths, her speech undoubtingly moves the audience. Hillary also uses anaphora when starting each point with “it is a violation of human rights” (americanrhetoric.com). This is to emphasize that the abusing done to women is specifically wrong because it is a violation of human
Overall, Hillary Rodham Clinton gave a convincing speech on women’s rights at the U.N. World Conference by using the key rhetorical techniques ethos, pathos, logos, and anaphora’s. The use of these techniques helped the audience believe in the cause of which Clinton was speaking about, sympathize for situations females were being put through, and working to strive towards equal rights for everyone. Clinton used the same stance throughout her speech and raised her voice at points in her speech that needed
Ann Richards’s keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention in 1988 was extremely interesting to watch. I believe her speech was intended to be focused on the American family and also the American farmers. These two areas seemed to be very important to Mrs. Richards and she made a point to discuss both.
To summarize this analysis, Hillary Clinton shows us how as we unite, the stronger our bond is. She uses clever ways to show this action. Though she did not win this presidential election, she is still loved by many. She helped herself because of the way she wrote and persuaded people to join her. Using rhetorical appeals
...women has escalated to an all-time high. Hillary Clinton’s speech “Women’s Rights are Human Rights” targets this growing problem and by portraying a purpose, style and language, and different appeals to the audience effectively.
Clinton’s speech connects to all women as a whole as she explains that we as women have more things in common than differences. Clinton explains “if women are healthy, and educated, their families will flourish. If women are free from violence, their families will flourish. If women have a chance to work and earn as full and equal partner in society, their families will flourish”. Clinton engages the males in the audience when she explains that men are important in making women be equal members of society. As families grow in each other the community around them will strengthen too and everyone will be a valuable part of society. This shows women’s rights are just as important as human rights. Clinton uses this deductive reasoning to make the point to her audience that society does better as a whole if women are treated equally. Clinton states” We must recognize that women will never gain full dignity until their human rights are respected and protected.” Using this logical appeal she states the problem and then goes on to give reasoning on how we should fix it. Governments all around the world need to “accept their responsibility to protect and promote internationally recognized human
On September 3, 2008 Sarah Palin gave her vice presidential acceptance speech, in which she claimed to help John McCain serve and defend our country. Throughout the speech Palin tells her life story, beliefs, and future plans she has for helping our country. Palin’s use of anecdote and pathos made her come across as trustworthy and relatable which is something many people lack when it comes to public speaking. Palin smiled, made eye contact, and pointed her finger to show that she was a friend, but also a leader. This speech was the best speech of her career. It showed her true character and changed many people's opinion of her.
...n our country. She’s saying that the advancement of women is getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. This was such a strong point in her speech because it shed light into the logical thinking, and made a historical connection to slavery. By making this connection, she was able to help many see that women were convicted slaves to the current state of the union.
Many people think feminism and the effort of fighting for women rights belongs to women, they neglect the fact that men also take a significant part in fighting for equality. To persuade people to take move in an unpopular event, the speech requires tactical reasoning and deliberate use of rhetorical elements. Rhetorical devices include, logos, pathos, and ethos; to deliver a compelling speech the speaker needs to utilize these rhetorical devices to form deliberate and tactical reasoning. In Emma Watson’s speech at United Nation, she employs tactical reasoning and rhetorical elements to persuade men in joining the HeForShe campaign.
In this speech, Clinton is showcasing how horribly some women in other countries live their lives and why we need to care about them. During her speech, she uses several rhetorical devices to persuade the audience to begin to really care about these women and their wellbeing. During this speech Clinton becomes the voice for the voiceless women around the world.
For my Rhetorical Critique Essay, I decided to critique the speech by UN Women Goodwill Ambassador, Emma Watson, which she gave to United Nations Headquarters in 2014. The main purpose of this speech was to explain a new campaign for gender equality called “HeForShe”. In the speech Ms. Watson says uses personal stories, facts, and appeals to emotion. The thesis of this speech is that gender equality is everyone’s concern; that being feminist not something that means “man-hating (Watson),” but rather a term that simply implies the fact that a person believes that men and women should be treated equally. She makes this speech different from all the other speeches on gender equality by trying to appeal to her male audience the most. This worked
Women throughout history received little to no rights in regards to education, job opportunities, and sufferage. Women are often stereotyped as simply an “angel of the house,” as they clean, cook, and cared for their families. Today, this stereotype has been overcome. Women are leaders; CEO’s, business owners, government leaders, and presidential candidates, such as Hillary Clinton. They have overcome the idea of a patriarchal society, and continue living out the intention of the Founder Fathers, equality for all. Recently, President Obama established the Equal Pay Act ensuring equal opportunity for women in the workforce. This act focuses individually on the income of women as recent studies show that in fact women are being paid less than men. Making amends to this controversial issue is something the President has taken very seriously, showing that gender biases have and will continue to be
As a very left wing politician, Julia Gillard does not hold back when addressing major and controversial topics. Her speeches have highlighted movements and injustices, shedding light to problems occurring in her home continent, worldwide. One of Gillard’s most renowned speeches, the Misogyny Speech is a great example of her aggressive manner in fighting for justice. She uses words to fight for change, allowing diction to be her catalyst for a movement in society. Julia Gillard effectively illustrates her message to her audience through successful use of available means while responding to the proposed problem in a fitting manner. As a result of her appropriate rhetorical advance,
Mrs. Clinton supports women’s equal rights, equality for LGBTQ, and to legalize gay/lesbian marriage. Hillary said during International Human Rights Day in 2011, "“Being LGBT does not make you less human. And that is why gay rights are human rights and human rights are gay rights”. 2My beliefs are the same as Clinton, equality and equal rights for everyone. This topic is important to me because I want my sisters and Mom to have the same rights as me and feel equal in this world. Lastly, Hillary Clinton ideas and stand in equal rights leads me to vote for
Emma Watson makes another strong point by giving an example “In 1997, Hillary Clinton made a famous speech in Beijing about women’s rights […] what stood out for me the most was that less than thirty percent of the audience were male. How
Renowned British actress and activist for the feminist movement, Emma Watson, in her speech to the United Nations, “HeForShe,” argues that gender discrimination is a plague to human civilization. Watson’s purpose is to sway the audience that gender inequality has to come to an end, with the support of men and women as advocates for egalitarianism. Additionally, she enlightens the audience that the problem originated from political affairs, the economy, and social disparity. Watson creates a compassionate tone in order to convey men, specifically those who negatively perceived feminism or did not think that feminist issues affected them. Nevertheless, Watson’s speech is ineffectively persuasive due to the poor description she formulated