Rfid Tag Case

722 Words2 Pages

Each of these recommendations can in its own way contribute to a better managed supply chain and more control for Target over its inventories. The reduction of stockouts, even if it only results in the recovery of 5% of potential lost sales, vice the expected loss of 7% mentioned earlier, would be an additional $3.6B in added sales on the top line. For this reason, Target must choose and implement at least one of these recommendations. For all practical purposes it is likely that Target will implement more than one of these solutions, but we have assessed that the RFID tag solution is the most aggressive approach and offers the best long-term solution for this problem. Despite the lack of universal standards for chip makers, readers, and IT support systems, the technology associated with RFID is improving every year, and as more and more chip suppliers enter the market, the competitive landscape contributes to affordability improvements. Affordability isn’t really an issue for a firm the size of Target. This is not to say that Target can just throw money around when considering solutions to its problem, but the barrier to implementation by Target is not going to be a fiscal barrier. More than likely it will be a supplier adoption barrier, where certain vendors will not want to implement the technology in their own supply chains. However, if …show more content…

Target suppliers are not all going to want to invest in implementation of such systems either. However when one considers that many of these suppliers are dependent on Target for their own success and Target holds the upper hand in negotiations with these suppliers, in the end they may not have much of a choice. Having said that, it also increases their own opportunity to do business with other retailers like Walmart and Amazon, both of whom already use RFID systems for managing their supply

Open Document