Relationship Between Death And Death

1697 Words4 Pages

Death is the equalizer of all life. Throughout time people have constructed death in many different ways. For ancient civilizations, such as Mesopotamia, Egypt, Ugarit, Greece, and Rome, death consisted of burial rituals and practices, the construction of monuments, murals, and stele, and offering libations to the dead. These civilizations shared many aspects in their perceptions of death and the afterlife, but those perceptions also varied enough to be individualistic and unique to each civilization. Among the many differences between civilizations’ perceptions, some of the variations involved the location of graves, the type of monuments constructed, the structure of the funeral, and preparation of the dead body for the funeral. The relationship …show more content…

Invoking the name of ancestors emphasizes a family’s status, and establishes a link between the spirits and ghosts and the living. Pearson’s argument agrees with “Defining the Imagines” from Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture by Harriet Flower. “Defining the Imagines” discusses the use of wax masks that were designed to resemble the portrait of the ancestor. These were necessary for funeral processions, and they were worn by actors who were chosen for their body type similarities to the ancestor (Flower 37). Wax masks could have been an outlet for family members to show appreciation and remembrance of their ancestors. Or, the masks could have been a way for the family to show off their important ancestors. The precessions were luxurious and most likely only happened for noble families (Flower 39). Additionally, there were other types of ways to display genealogies in the Roman household, such as murals of painted faces on a family tree, and shield portraits of ancestors (Flower …show more content…

Pearson describes funerary architecture as a separate entity from domestic architecture (195). This isn’t true for all ancient civilizations, because at Ugarit family tombs were built underneath the household (Marchegay 208-209). Since every house had a tomb in the basement it is unlikely that the idea to turn the basement into a tomb was an afterthought. There must have been a lot of consideration in the designing of this city to allow every house to have a chamber underneath it for the family tomb. The family tomb underneath a domestic piece of architecture was deliberate and definitely planned by city officials (Marchegay 208). Marchegay writes that the more crowded an area in the city was, the more tombs it had to hold (208). This example of funerary architecture was not a separate entity of domestic architecture. It was an important aspect of life in Ugarit to have your ancestors buried beneath your home. Thus, the point of the separation of funerary and domestic architecture in Pearson’s text does not hold true for all ancient civilizations.
“Collective Memory and the Meanings of the Past” in Martyrdom and Memory by Elizabeth Castelli is overall not very similar to other scholarly texts. The text mainly focus on Christianity, which isn’t a religion that was discussed in class. The one major similarity between Castelli’s argument and other scholarly texts

Open Document