Reflection Of A Seminar: Anthropology Of Writing And Reading

1261 Words3 Pages

2. My scientific pursuits from my postdoctoral (habilitation) dissertation have found its teaching equivalent in the form of a seminar titled Anthropology of Writing and Reading, which I am currently holding at the Institute of Polish Philology, University of Wrocław. During the course, in collaboration with students I am analysing the problems regarding the area of theory and practice of the creative process, questions of the relation between the author and his creative output, as well as issues of reading theory/practice and reception of literary works by literary audience. The seminar helped me, in part, to clarify and prepare materials for my dissertation Negating Machine..., which initiated and is currently guiding my academic research towards literary anthropology. In connection with the topic of this course and apart from the literary and reading questions some intimate literary works (diaristic, epistolary) of selected Modernistic, mainly Polish, writers were subjected to analysis. In cooperation with the students I studied the relationship between biography and existence versus literary creativity and fiction. Referring to the figures of the writers, reconstructed on the basis of their intimate texts I applied the concept of person – worked out three decades ago by the research unit of Maria Janion. In my opinion, …show more content…

Whilst tracing the diary and prose of Białoszewski (also the tabooed areas therein) I indicated the difference in disclosing sexuality as compared to the other modern writer, born almost half a century later, Adam Wiedemann. This comparative selection was dictated by similar problems concerning social conventions and a unique autobiographical prose of the latter writer. Equally important was the discussion, published then in the literary magazines, about Adam Wiedemann 's prose, tabooisation of sexuality and its disclosure in recent

Open Document