Racist Positivism in Latin America

1168 Words3 Pages

The mutability of the postcolonial relationship between Indians and the republics becomes most apparent after 1850. The ideals of liberty and equality went astray in the late nineteenth century being destabilized by an upswing of another form political policy, liberalism. This liberalism was interwoven with racism and sexism, and colored by positivist interpretations of science, society and knowledge that were becoming common currency in Western Europe.

In order to understand the reaction to liberal policies of native populations in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, it is important to focus on the scientific method that was applied to social phenomenon at the time. These new urban elites embraced the scientific techniques that were developed to apply to social interaction. New diagnostic techniques allowed reformers to asses the capacity of Indians to improve themselves and their race (Larson p.64).

The formation of positivism is central to understanding how the elite viewed the non white subalterns. The difference in the ideals of the elite and indigenous populations was part of the contradictory nature of the national identity and that the elite wanted to resolve. The native was caught in a dichotomy that made Indians fundamental and contrary to the liberal ideals of progress and civilization (Larson p.246). Race theorists worried about the capacity of their own multi-ethnic societies for modernity (Larson p.65). These positivist theorists identified any indigenous, African, or mixed race to be inferior to the "whiteness" of Europeans. Positivist racism helped elites reconcile the difference between the rural population and themselves. The ideas associated with scientific racism identified Europeans as...

... middle of paper ...

....252).

While each of the different countries in the Andean region had particular circumstances, several things remained constant. There was still a high concentration of land ownership with elites or foreign firms, a displacement of communal lands, orientation around export economies, low values of native human capital, and the continuation of the dichotomy between rural and urban populations. Creole elites had hoped to change their countries from what they considered backwards and rural into nations that were more inline with European ideas of technology and progress. Regardless of the intensity of liberalism after 1850, when discussing the extent of Indian reaction to these policies, it is important to remember that it was not all reactionary and that some Indians used the social and cultural gaps created by the racial discourse to improve their situation.

Open Document