Pros And Cons Of Tracking

656 Words2 Pages

Pros and Cons of Tracking In general, tracking has become a controversial topic that elicits strong opinions from both sides. Proponents of tracking believe it can facilitate instruction by individualizing instruction. Also, they believe it empowers instructors to modify teaching technique according to class level. In addition, arguments in favor state that tracking eliminates the probability that advanced students will experience boredom due to the participation of slower students. Lastly, those supporting tracking suggest tracking encourages slower students to participate since more capable classmates will not overshadow them (Ansalone, 2010, p. 4-5). There is an assumption shared by supporters that students will suffer emotionally if they …show more content…

According to Ansalone (2010), “tracking is a defective strategy” (p.14). Opponents of tracking claim lower tracks contain “disproportionate number of Black and Hispanics and that tracking facilitates the separation of social classes” (Ansalone, 2010, p. 6). Research suggests that tracking generally results in the separation of students along racial, ethnic, and socio-economic lines (Ansalone, 2010, p. 11). There is also speculation that high SES students are more often placed in upper tracks. According to Berends (1995), “qualitative researchers have consistently maintained that students’ attitudes toward school differ according to track placement” (p. 328). Those in the lower tracks tend to develop “anti-school” attitudes, while students in higher tracks are “predisposed to accept the…school’s system of values’, and this system gives them high prestige” (Berends, 1995, p. 330). Additionally, those against tracking believe each track tries to instill contrasting personality traits and provide differing hidden curriculums. Decision-making and creativity are accentuated for the upper tracks, while obedience and acceptance are stressed in the lower tracks (Ansalone, 2010, p.6). In addition, the instruction in the lower tracks is usually simplified, slower pace, and relies heavily on rote memorization whereas higher track courses are more complex and utilize higher order thinking. Plus, upper level students receive more individual attention from their instructors (Ansalone, 2010, p.10). As for the general assumption that tracking improves the self-concept and self-esteem of all children, the available research does not support this (Ansalone, 2010, p.12). Plus, researchers have found that students of lower ability seem to do better when mixed with students of mixed ability (Ansalone, 2010, p. 9). In a study exploring the effects of an educational expansion in Northern Ireland, where access

Open Document