In the real world, if you don’t show up for work regularly, you’re going to be fired. If scholars get into the habit of not showing up for class with no real repercussions, what lesson does that teach? Significant lessons that students need to learn is self-discipline, and by requiring students attend lectures, colleges should include strong incentives such attendance percentages accumulated in the final results for being disciplined. The third argument in favor of mandatory attendance is that students perform better in class if they turn up. In classes where class exercises are a major part of the learning experience –like public speaking or creative writing–low attendance may lead to a failing grade.
Test anxiety has been known to affect people who are scholars in the education field. This ranges from tertiary institutions, middle level colleges, and down to level institutions. Following the results of test anxiety, it is actually good to try and find solutio... ... middle of paper ... ...ts and teachers could work together in encouraging learners to be fully prepared for their examinations on time. In addition, some professors are to blame for the increased prevalence of test anxiety among the learners. This is because they do not adequately prepare students for the exams.
When a student gets a failing grade, this might trigger them to study harder and broaden their minds in the possibilities in the area of knowledge. Moreover, grades of students have the psychological result of grades to students. Parikh defined grades as a basis of intellectual capacity of students in the classroom. It can improve a student’s emotional state and/or break his confidence. In some cases, grades are determinants of a student’s superiority inside the classroom.
Test anxiety is a common phenomenon among students and is a problem among the education system. According to 1 and 14, test anxiety is an unpleasant emotional experience or fear of failing, before or during important examinations. Unpleasant experiences consist of dread, fear, apprehension, worry, tension, and doubt which makes test situations appear threatening (1, 2, 5, 6, & 8). These experiences decrease one’s ability to cope with stressful testing situations and inhibits performance ability. Test anxiety also compromises psychological, physiological, and behavioral reactions that impact academic progress (10, & 19).
Often, teachers put a lot of time into their lesson plans while trying to think of creative ways to make the lessons exciting for their students in the classroom. Teachers are often blamed if a student does not pass a class especially in elementary school. Why is it their fault though? If they have a good lesson plan and are trying to help their students then why is it their fault if a student does not pass the grade? This would be different if the teacher was not trying to help the students and did not give good instruction, but if they did then they should not be at fault.
An article by Greg Jouriles helps explain why we don’t need these tests. He claims, “Standardized tests are unnecessary because they rarely show what we don’t already know” (Jouriles, Greg). He also goes on to explain that one’s test score isn’t reliable and that we should trust the teachers when grades are published. A school system can accurately judge the students in the school on what they are good at better than the standardized tests do. They can break down many different aspects of what students need to improve on and what they are already knowledgeable of.
The reason for theses tests are to make a student more knowledgeable, and a head start for college, but they keep the students at a tenth grade level with each test. Even if the student is promoted to the next grade,the student will not be introduced to the education they require. If these tests do not give what is promised, then why have them? If the state, teachers, students, and schools focus more on education and less on state tests standards; then the teachers will have done their job. Students will be ready for college and their future careers.
It may seem childish, but it does make a lot of sense. Schools can help develop us into better people n a lot of different ways. School is where you begin to learn most of your life lessons. If you choose to not learn life tools because you’re cheating, then you’re going to find yourself struggling and making poor decisions for your future. A second solution to cheating is for the teachers to watch their students very carefully while they are taking an exam.
They socialize with others, learn respect and become well-rounded individuals. This requires students to not only develop their talents but also their weaknesses. This Achilles' heel may be academic, such as math and science or more artistic, like vocal music (Source F). Although students may not be pursuing a future in these areas, learning them is part of becoming a balanced person academically. Only strengthening and focusing on a student’s specific talent could create an image... ... middle of paper ... ...e actually interested in, they could begin to view the school day as an obstacle to just push through.
Standardized testing was once a good idea, to test the students’ capabilities and to see how they compare with other districts, but teachers teach using different methods and focus on different issues. What they think is important may not be what other teachers feel is important or what the state thinks is important. So, as a student you learn more about what the teacher deems important, but are evaluated on by what the state thinks is important. Standardized tests are not a reliable way to evaluate someone’s intelligence. This brings us back to what the students were taught in class and how it has been assimilated.