Pros And Cons Of Police Interrogation Tactics

1094 Words3 Pages

Police Interrogation Tactics
A confession at any cost In the United States, law enforcement officers are infamously known for violating average citizen’s constitutional rights in order to get a confession. Instead of being innocent ‘til proven guilty, the roles are actually swapped. The minute you are booked for an alleged crime you may have committed, your chances of walking away are slim. But is this actually feasible? Is the law enforcement that is supposedly there to protect us, in reality harming us?
Imagine you are at home watching the local news. You see the police searching for a robber that is your doppelganger. Your neighbor, John, whose window was broken by your son’s baseball sees this same report, decides to call the police to report that the suspect is his neighbor and is currently home. The police come, and arrest you on reasonable suspicion. The commissioner of the task force has been hassling the department for months to catch this guy, and if they can’t get the confession, they are off the case.
Terrified of your predicament, worried about your family, and no one answering any of your questions, you start feeling a panic attack come on. As you are about to go insane for the never ending silence, finally the detective …show more content…

In fact, the minute they bring someone in on reasonable suspicion, there is an 80% chances of the suspect being the guilty party. Therefore, beyond reasonable doubt a blurred line is established. Detectives have evidence to bring in the suspect, getting them to confess becomes the mission of the case. Whether or not they are innocent or guilty doesn’t matter, for chances are their suspect is in fact guilty. And the faster they book someone, the better their arrest record gets, and the further they can advance their career. If it means overlook some information and just aim to get the confession, to pull an arrest, it will

Open Document