Police officers need the correct discipline when it comes to controlling how much power they are giving. Power would go to any persons head, whether they intend for it to or not, simply because of our humanity. The purpose of MPPR is to help people come to the authorities. It helps them gain the confidence they need to report what has happened to them. A lot of the time, victims of any abuse are afraid to go to the authorities from fear of their attacker coming for them again, fear of angering the entire police
Will we ever be able to stop police brutality from happening? The answer is no, but we can make people aware of it and help minimize it . There will always be some kind of complaints about police brutality happening no matter what is done because under dangerous situations that require fast action and quick thinking people will make mistakes. The only thing is to hope for the training of police to be more advanced, the officers to be more aware of their current situations, and police officers to do their best to protect the public without causing more injuries than
Walker pointed out few basic assumptions which are related to deterrence theory that may not work at the real world. First, offenders have to be aware of the threat (123). For example, they have to know that they are exposed to being caught if there are more police officers out there to arrest them. Second, offenders have to perceive that violations of law may lead to unwanted incidents, so they need to be avoided. They should realize the criminal record is bad for their future; if they want to apply for a job, there is low possibility that interviewers will accept them since they have criminal records.
Police should be armed because it can reduce crime, can handle more dangerous threats, and can save lives. Law enforcement should be armed, because when police are not armed, with at least some kind of weaponry, the criminal will probably get their way if they are superior firepower. Almost 50% of the fatalities of law enforcement on the line of duty. It is not right to give them something to protect themselves and other people with. It is their job.
The more pu... ... middle of paper ... ...effort to get this problem under control. The idea is to make sure the public does not have to fear that an officer of the law can use their power and get away with this type of behavior. It is the job of the entire police force to look at the situation and work amongst themselves to find anwsers that work best for their department, by doing this it could absoultely reduce unnecessary abuse of power in their department. It would not be acceptable to sweep this behavior under-the-rug, but to deal with it head on. It is possible to prevent so many unnecessary incidents of excessive force or abuse in police departments.
The criminal justice field faces the challenges of getting criminals off the streets, and prosecuting them, while using limited funds and manpower. Citizens expect results, and want to feel safe when they are in their own neighborhood. On the other hand, citizens in our democratic country expect people to be treated fairly, and feel the need to make sure that no innocent people are wrongly sent to jail. It is a balancing act of keeping the community safe on one hand, and on the other, making sure that no one’s rights are violated. It is like being told to do a job, but then having all these rules and obstacles you have to navigate around in order to do your job.
Since the police officers have a lot of say in dealing with calls and crimes, they all vary in their approaches to doing so. For instance, one officer may think a call is not as important as another, while a separate officer may decide the first call was more serious and he/she may respond to that one first. This is the same problem with whether or not to use force. There are many factors that affect not only the officer’s decision to use force, but also the criminal’s choice of actions. If an officer is being rude or discriminating against a suspect, then that suspect may act in a more vicious manner.
One of the clauses within the 4th Amendment is called the stop and frisk policy and it protects police officers and surrounding citizens during a potentially threatening situation. Although the stop and frisk policy is debatable and concerning to many citizens, it is not something that should be eliminated because of individuals unjust feelings. In the criminal arena of law, probable cause and reasonable suspicion are the main focuses associated with searching and/or arresting citizens, but hold very different guidelines. Probable cause is important in two main regards. First, police must possess probable cause before they may search a person or any of their property, and they also must possess probable cause before he/she may arrest that person.
Furthermore, they cannot arrest everyone who has ever committed a crime and get them ready for prosecution. A third pro to the use of discretion in law enforcement, concerns the variations in the seriousness of offenders behaviors. Every offender police encounter is different, thus police officers have to consider the contextual and mitigating factors as well as the offender themselves and not just the illegality of the offence. Hence, this is where discretion is advantageous in assessing the culpability of an offender. Not everyone can be treated in the same manner as professional criminals, there needs to be exceptions for individual circumstances, which brings police discretion into
The taser is able to easily help officers restrain offenders, they are easy to use effectively, and most importantly, may prevent many fatalities. One of the main reasons why tasers is an important tool for police officers and is because of the restraint. When a police officer is on duty, their main duty is to enforce the law. Police will always come across unlawful citizens who will refuse to be arrested by a police officer. In order to arrest the person, the officer must restrain the person.